我们来看ServerBootstrap.bind() 方法
bind方法 位于父类AbstractBootstrap中
/**
* Create a new {@link Channel} and bind it.
*/
public ChannelFuture bind(int inetPort) {
return bind(new InetSocketAddress(inetPort));
} /**
* Create a new {@link Channel} and bind it.
*/
public ChannelFuture bind(SocketAddress localAddress) {
validate();
if (localAddress == null) {
throw new NullPointerException("localAddress");
}
return doBind(localAddress);
}
/**
* Validate all the parameters. Sub-classes may override this, but should
* call the super method in that case.
*/
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public B validate() {
if (group == null) {
throw new IllegalStateException("group not set");
}
if (channelFactory == null) {
throw new IllegalStateException("channel or channelFactory not set");
}
return (B) this;
}public interface ChannelFuture extends Future<Void> public interface Future<V> extends java.util.concurrent.Future<V>
private ChannelFuture doBind(final SocketAddress localAddress) {
final ChannelFuture regFuture = initAndRegister();
final Channel channel = regFuture.channel();
if (regFuture.cause() != null) {
return regFuture;
}
if (regFuture.isDone()) {
// At this point we know that the registration was complete and successful.
ChannelPromise promise = channel.newPromise();
doBind0(regFuture, channel, localAddress, promise);
return promise;
} else {
// Registration future is almost always fulfilled already, but just in case it's not.
final PendingRegistrationPromise promise = new PendingRegistrationPromise(channel);
regFuture.addListener(new ChannelFutureListener() {
@Override
public void operationComplete(ChannelFuture future) throws Exception {
Throwable cause = future.cause();
if (cause != null) {
// Registration on the EventLoop failed so fail the ChannelPromise directly to not cause an
// IllegalStateException once we try to access the EventLoop of the Channel.
promise.setFailure(cause);
} else {
// Registration was successful, so set the correct executor to use.
// See https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/2586
promise.registered();
doBind0(regFuture, channel, localAddress, promise);
}
}
});
return promise;
}
}我们来看initAndRegister
final ChannelFuture initAndRegister() {
Channel channel = null;
try {
channel = channelFactory.newChannel();
init(channel);
} catch (Throwable t) {
if (channel != null) {
// channel can be null if newChannel crashed (eg SocketException("too many open files"))
channel.unsafe().closeForcibly();
}
// as the Channel is not registered yet we need to force the usage of the GlobalEventExecutor
return new DefaultChannelPromise(channel, GlobalEventExecutor.INSTANCE).setFailure(t);
}
ChannelFuture regFuture = config().group().register(channel);
if (regFuture.cause() != null) {
if (channel.isRegistered()) {
channel.close();
} else {
channel.unsafe().closeForcibly();
}
}
// If we are here and the promise is not failed, it's one of the following cases:
// 1) If we attempted registration from the event loop, the registration has been completed at this point.
// i.e. It's safe to attempt bind() or connect() now because the channel has been registered.
// 2) If we attempted registration from the other thread, the registration request has been successfully
// added to the event loop's task queue for later execution.
// i.e. It's safe to attempt bind() or connect() now:
// because bind() or connect() will be executed *after* the scheduled registration task is executed
// because register(), bind(), and connect() are all bound to the same thread.
return regFuture;
}还记得channelFactory 是通过ReflectiveChannelFactory
public T newChannel() {
try {
return clazz.getConstructor().newInstance();
} catch (Throwable t) {
throw new ChannelException("Unable to create Channel from class " + clazz, t);
}
}通过反射调用NioServerSocketChannel无参的构造方法创建NioServerSocketChannel 的实例
我们在看 NioServerSocketChannel ： 是如何创建的 默认构造方法NioServerSocketChannel（）里的this方法调用newSocket 方法
public class NioServerSocketChannel extends AbstractNioMessageChannel
implements io.netty.channel.socket.ServerSocketChannel {
private static final ChannelMetadata METADATA = new ChannelMetadata(false, 16);
private static final SelectorProvider DEFAULT_SELECTOR_PROVIDER = SelectorProvider.provider();
private static final InternalLogger logger = InternalLoggerFactory.getInstance(NioServerSocketChannel.class);
private static ServerSocketChannel newSocket(SelectorProvider provider) {
try {
/**
* Use the {@link SelectorProvider} to open {@link SocketChannel} and so remove condition in
* {@link SelectorProvider#provider()} which is called by each ServerSocketChannel.open() otherwise.
*
* See <a href="https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/2308">#2308</a>.
*/
return provider.openServerSocketChannel();
} catch (IOException e) {
throw new ChannelException(
"Failed to open a server socket.", e);
}
}
private final ServerSocketChannelConfig config;
/**
* Create a new instance
*/
public NioServerSocketChannel() {
this(newSocket(DEFAULT_SELECTOR_PROVIDER));
}
我们看下 concurrent.Future
一个future 代表一个异步计算的结果，并且提供了一些方法来检查计算是否已经完成，还提供了 等待计算完成方法，提供了计算完成的结果，计算完成的结果 只能通过get方法获取到，get方法默认是阻塞的 ，直到计算完成 才返回计算结果。取消操作是通过cancle方法来完成，还提供了一些方法来判断 计算是正常完成的还是被取消掉的，
/*
*
*
*
*
*
* Written by Doug Lea with assistance from members of JCP JSR-166
* Expert Group and released to the public domain, as explained at
* http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
*/
package java.util.concurrent;
/**
* A {@code Future} represents the result of an asynchronous
* computation. Methods are provided to check if the computation is
* complete, to wait for its completion, and to retrieve the result of
* the computation. The result can only be retrieved using method
* {@code get} when the computation has completed, blocking if
* necessary until it is ready. Cancellation is performed by the
* {@code cancel} method. Additional methods are provided to
* determine if the task completed normally or was cancelled. Once a
* computation has completed, the computation cannot be cancelled.
* If you would like to use a {@code Future} for the sake
* of cancellability but not provide a usable result, you can
* declare types of the form {@code Future<?>} and
* return {@code null} as a result of the underlying task.
*
* <p>
* <b>Sample Usage</b> (Note that the following classes are all
* made-up.)
* <pre> {@code
* interface ArchiveSearcher { String search(String target); }
* class App {
* ExecutorService executor = ...
* ArchiveSearcher searcher = ...
* void showSearch(final String target)
* throws InterruptedException {
* Future<String> future
* = executor.submit(new Callable<String>() {
* public String call() {
* return searcher.search(target);
* }});
* displayOtherThings(); // do other things while searching
* try {
* displayText(future.get()); // use future
* } catch (ExecutionException ex) { cleanup(); return; }
* }
* }}</pre>
*
* The {@link FutureTask} class is an implementation of {@code Future} that
* implements {@code Runnable}, and so may be executed by an {@code Executor}.
* For example, the above construction with {@code submit} could be replaced by:
* <pre> {@code
* FutureTask<String> future =
* new FutureTask<String>(new Callable<String>() {
* public String call() {
* return searcher.search(target);
* }});
* executor.execute(future);}</pre>
*
* <p>Memory consistency effects: Actions taken by the asynchronous computation
* <a href="package-summary.html#MemoryVisibility"> <i>happen-before</i></a>
* actions following the corresponding {@code Future.get()} in another thread.
*
* @see FutureTask
* @see Executor
* @since 1.5
* @author Doug Lea
* @param <V> The result type returned by this Future's {@code get} method
*/
public interface Future<V> {
/**
* Attempts to cancel execution of this task. This attempt will
* fail if the task has already completed, has already been cancelled,
* or could not be cancelled for some other reason. If successful,
* and this task has not started when {@code cancel} is called,
* this task should never run. If the task has already started,
* then the {@code mayInterruptIfRunning} parameter determines
* whether the thread executing this task should be interrupted in
* an attempt to stop the task.
*
* <p>After this method returns, subsequent calls to {@link #isDone} will
* always return {@code true}. Subsequent calls to {@link #isCancelled}
* will always return {@code true} if this method returned {@code true}.
*
* @param mayInterruptIfRunning {@code true} if the thread executing this
* task should be interrupted; otherwise, in-progress tasks are allowed
* to complete
* @return {@code false} if the task could not be cancelled,
* typically because it has already completed normally;
* {@code true} otherwise
*/
boolean cancel(boolean mayInterruptIfRunning);
/**
* Returns {@code true} if this task was cancelled before it completed
* normally.
*
* @return {@code true} if this task was cancelled before it completed
*/
boolean isCancelled();
/**
* Returns {@code true} if this task completed.
*
* Completion may be due to normal termination, an exception, or
* cancellation -- in all of these cases, this method will return
* {@code true}.
*
* @return {@code true} if this task completed
*/
boolean isDone();
/**
* Waits if necessary for the computation to complete, and then
* retrieves its result.
*
* @return the computed result
* @throws CancellationException if the computation was cancelled
* @throws ExecutionException if the computation threw an
* exception
* @throws InterruptedException if the current thread was interrupted
* while waiting
*/
V get() throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException;
/**
* Waits if necessary for at most the given time for the computation
* to complete, and then retrieves its result, if available.
*
* @param timeout the maximum time to wait
* @param unit the time unit of the timeout argument
* @return the computed result
* @throws CancellationException if the computation was cancelled
* @throws ExecutionException if the computation threw an
* exception
* @throws InterruptedException if the current thread was interrupted
* while waiting
* @throws TimeoutException if the wait timed out
*/
V get(long timeout, TimeUnit unit)
throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException, TimeoutException;
}
我们在看下netty 的future 为我们提供了 一些额外的方法
package io.netty.util.concurrent;
import java.util.concurrent.CancellationException;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
/**
* The result of an asynchronous operation.
*/
@SuppressWarnings("ClassNameSameAsAncestorName")
public interface Future<V> extends java.util.concurrent.Future<V> isSuccess 方法： 如果仅仅的是IO 操作完成返回ture
/**
* Returns {@code true} if and only if the I/O operation was completed
* successfully.
*/
boolean isSuccess();
isCancellable 方法：可以通过cancel 方法取消 就返回true;
/**
* returns {@code true} if and only if the operation can be cancelled via {@link #cancel(boolean)}.
*/
boolean isCancellable();
/**
* Adds the specified listener to this future. The
* specified listener is notified when this future is
* {@linkplain #isDone() done}. If this future is already
* completed, the specified listener is notified immediately.
*/
Future<V> addListener(GenericFutureListener<? extends Future<? super V>> listener);可以添加多个listener
/**
* Adds the specified listeners to this future. The
* specified listeners are notified when this future is
* {@linkplain #isDone() done}. If this future is already
* completed, the specified listeners are notified immediately.
*/
Future<V> addListeners(GenericFutureListener<? extends Future<? super V>>... listeners);
sync() 等待计算的完成，如果失败则抛出失败的原因
/**
* Waits for this future until it is done, and rethrows the cause of the failure if this future
* failed.
*/
Future<V> sync() throws InterruptedException;
/**
* Waits for this future to be completed.
*
* @throws InterruptedException
* if the current thread was interrupted
*/
Future<V> await() throws InterruptedException; /**
* Return the result without blocking. If the future is not done yet this will return {@code null}.
*
* As it is possible that a {@code null} value is used to mark the future as successful you also need to check
* if the future is really done with {@link #isDone()} and not relay on the returned {@code null} value.
*/
V getNow();
为什么Netty 自己实现JDK future ？ 我们并不清楚什么时候调用get()方法 而netty 帮我们实现了 addListeners 监听 程序是否执行完成 ，而且 提供了是否成功的方法，而jdk future 只能判断是否完成，不清楚是正常完成还是 异常结束。
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
接下来我们看下ChannelFuture 源码： 继承了Future
它表示异步的 channle IO操作的结果，Netty所有的IO 操作都是异步的，它就意味着IO的调用返回 可能方法正在执行，你将会得到一个ChannelFuture ，来反馈它的状态结果。
ChannelFuture 要么是uncompleted要么是completed，当一个IO操作开始事，一个新的future会被创建，新的future 既不是成功的也不是失败的也不是取消的，因为io操作是尚
未完成的，如果io操作完成了或者是成功了失败了，future就会被标记为完成了并且携带信息，比如失败的信息，请注意 失败和取消都属于完成的状态。
可以看下面 javadoc 里面的图形 来表示 io的状态。
使用addListener 来代替await()，addListener 是一个非阻塞的方法，并且在IO操作完成时收到通知，并且可以做任何后续的任务处理，await是个阻塞的方法。
不要在ChannelHandler中调用 await()方法，ChannelHandler当中事件处理器方法（就是客户建立连接，或者读取等）通过会被IO线程调用，如果await被事件处理器调用，
而事件处理器又被IO线程调用的，那么所等待的IO操作就可能永远不会完成，因为await方法可能会阻塞所等待的IO操作 就是死锁。
不要将 IO 超时 与 wait 超时 混淆 ： await(long timeout, TimeUnit unit) awaitUninterruptibly(long timeoutMillis); awaitUninterruptibly(long timeout, TimeUnit unit); 与IO超时是没
有任何关系的是等待超时，如果一个IO 超时，这个Future将会被标记失败
package io.netty.channel;
import io.netty.bootstrap.Bootstrap;
import io.netty.util.concurrent.BlockingOperationException;
import io.netty.util.concurrent.Future;
import io.netty.util.concurrent.GenericFutureListener;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
/**
* The result of an asynchronous {@link Channel} I/O operation.
* <p>
* All I/O operations in Netty are asynchronous. It means any I/O calls will
* return immediately with no guarantee that the requested I/O operation has
* been completed at the end of the call. Instead, you will be returned with
* a {@link ChannelFuture} instance which gives you the information about the
* result or status of the I/O operation.
* <p>
* A {@link ChannelFuture} is either <em>uncompleted</em> or <em>completed</em>.
* When an I/O operation begins, a new future object is created. The new future
* is uncompleted initially - it is neither succeeded, failed, nor cancelled
* because the I/O operation is not finished yet. If the I/O operation is
* finished either successfully, with failure, or by cancellation, the future is
* marked as completed with more specific information, such as the cause of the
* failure. Please note that even failure and cancellation belong to the
* completed state.
* <pre>
* +---------------------------+
* | Completed successfully |
* +---------------------------+
* +----> isDone() = true |
* +--------------------------+ | | isSuccess() = true |
* | Uncompleted | | +===========================+
* +--------------------------+ | | Completed with failure |
* | isDone() = false | | +---------------------------+
* | isSuccess() = false |----+----> isDone() = true |
* | isCancelled() = false | | | cause() = non-null |
* | cause() = null | | +===========================+
* +--------------------------+ | | Completed by cancellation |
* | +---------------------------+
* +----> isDone() = true |
* | isCancelled() = true |
* +---------------------------+
* </pre>
*
* Various methods are provided to let you check if the I/O operation has been
* completed, wait for the completion, and retrieve the result of the I/O
* operation. It also allows you to add {@link ChannelFutureListener}s so you
* can get notified when the I/O operation is completed.
*
* <h3>Prefer {@link #addListener(GenericFutureListener)} to {@link #await()}</h3>
*
* It is recommended to prefer {@link #addListener(GenericFutureListener)} to
* {@link #await()} wherever possible to get notified when an I/O operation is
* done and to do any follow-up tasks.
* <p>
* {@link #addListener(GenericFutureListener)} is non-blocking. It simply adds
* the specified {@link ChannelFutureListener} to the {@link ChannelFuture}, and
* I/O thread will notify the listeners when the I/O operation associated with
* the future is done. {@link ChannelFutureListener} yields the best
* performance and resource utilization because it does not block at all, but
* it could be tricky to implement a sequential logic if you are not used to
* event-driven programming.
* <p>
* By contrast, {@link #await()} is a blocking operation. Once called, the
* caller thread blocks until the operation is done. It is easier to implement
* a sequential logic with {@link #await()}, but the caller thread blocks
* unnecessarily until the I/O operation is done and there's relatively
* expensive cost of inter-thread notification. Moreover, there's a chance of
* dead lock in a particular circumstance, which is described below.
*
* <h3>Do not call {@link #await()} inside {@link ChannelHandler}</h3>
* <p>
* The event handler methods in {@link ChannelHandler} are usually called by
* an I/O thread. If {@link #await()} is called by an event handler
* method, which is called by the I/O thread, the I/O operation it is waiting
* for might never complete because {@link #await()} can block the I/O
* operation it is waiting for, which is a dead lock.
* <pre>
* // BAD - NEVER DO THIS
* {@code @Override}
* public void channelRead({@link ChannelHandlerContext} ctx, Object msg) {
* {@link ChannelFuture} future = ctx.channel().close();
* future.awaitUninterruptibly();
* // Perform post-closure operation
* // ...
* }
*
* // GOOD
* {@code @Override}
* public void channelRead({@link ChannelHandlerContext} ctx, Object msg) {
* {@link ChannelFuture} future = ctx.channel().close();
* future.addListener(new {@link ChannelFutureListener}() {
* public void operationComplete({@link ChannelFuture} future) {
* // Perform post-closure operation
* // ...
* }
* });
* }
* </pre>
* <p>
* In spite of the disadvantages mentioned above, there are certainly the cases
* where it is more convenient to call {@link #await()}. In such a case, please
* make sure you do not call {@link #await()} in an I/O thread. Otherwise,
* {@link BlockingOperationException} will be raised to prevent a dead lock.
*
* <h3>Do not confuse I/O timeout and await timeout</h3>
*
* The timeout value you specify with {@link #await(long)},
* {@link #await(long, TimeUnit)}, {@link #awaitUninterruptibly(long)}, or
* {@link #awaitUninterruptibly(long, TimeUnit)} are not related with I/O
* timeout at all. If an I/O operation times out, the future will be marked as
* 'completed with failure,' as depicted in the diagram above. For example,
* connect timeout should be configured via a transport-specific option:
* <pre>
* // BAD - NEVER DO THIS
* {@link Bootstrap} b = ...;
* {@link ChannelFuture} f = b.connect(...);
* f.awaitUninterruptibly(10, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
* if (f.isCancelled()) {
* // Connection attempt cancelled by user
* } else if (!f.isSuccess()) {
* // You might get a NullPointerException here because the future
* // might not be completed yet.
* f.cause().printStackTrace();
* } else {
* // Connection established successfully
* }
*
* // GOOD
* {@link Bootstrap} b = ...;
* // Configure the connect timeout option.
* <b>b.option({@link ChannelOption}.CONNECT_TIMEOUT_MILLIS, 10000);</b>
* {@link ChannelFuture} f = b.connect(...);
* f.awaitUninterruptibly();
*
* // Now we are sure the future is completed.
* assert f.isDone();
*
* if (f.isCancelled()) {
* // Connection attempt cancelled by user
* } else if (!f.isSuccess()) {
* f.cause().printStackTrace();
* } else {
* // Connection established successfully
* }
* </pre>
*/
public interface ChannelFuture extends Future<Void>
我们看看 ChannelFuture 里面的方法
channel（） 方法：返回一个与future 发生相关IO 操作的 channel通道 ，其他的方法 与父类方法相似 就不介绍了
/**
* Returns a channel where the I/O operation associated with this
* future takes place.
*/
Channel channel();我们在回到initAndRegister
final ChannelFuture initAndRegister() {
Channel channel = null;
try {
channel = channelFactory.newChannel();
init(channel);
} catch (Throwable t) {
if (channel != null) {
// channel can be null if newChannel crashed (eg SocketException("too many open files"))
channel.unsafe().closeForcibly();
}
// as the Channel is not registered yet we need to force the usage of the GlobalEventExecutor
return new DefaultChannelPromise(channel, GlobalEventExecutor.INSTANCE).setFailure(t);
}
ChannelFuture regFuture = config().group().register(channel);
if (regFuture.cause() != null) {
if (channel.isRegistered()) {
channel.close();
} else {
channel.unsafe().closeForcibly();
}
}
// If we are here and the promise is not failed, it's one of the following cases:
// 1) If we attempted registration from the event loop, the registration has been completed at this point.
// i.e. It's safe to attempt bind() or connect() now because the channel has been registered.
// 2) If we attempted registration from the other thread, the registration request has been successfully
// added to the event loop's task queue for later execution.
// i.e. It's safe to attempt bind() or connect() now:
// because bind() or connect() will be executed *after* the scheduled registration task is executed
// because register(), bind(), and connect() are all bound to the same thread.
return regFuture;
}
我们继续看init（）方法 ：
总结就是 进行一些属性赋值，然后生成通道的管道，此方法极为重要
@Override
void init(Channel channel) throws Exception {
final Map<ChannelOption<?>, Object> options = options0();
synchronized (options) {
setChannelOptions(channel, options, logger);
}
final Map<AttributeKey<?>, Object> attrs = attrs0();
synchronized (attrs) {
for (Entry<AttributeKey<?>, Object> e: attrs.entrySet()) {
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
AttributeKey<Object> key = (AttributeKey<Object>) e.getKey();
channel.attr(key).set(e.getValue());
}
}
ChannelPipeline p = channel.pipeline();
final EventLoopGroup currentChildGroup = childGroup;
final ChannelHandler currentChildHandler = childHandler;
final Entry<ChannelOption<?>, Object>[] currentChildOptions;
final Entry<AttributeKey<?>, Object>[] currentChildAttrs;
synchronized (childOptions) {
currentChildOptions = childOptions.entrySet().toArray(newOptionArray(childOptions.size()));
}
synchronized (childAttrs) {
currentChildAttrs = childAttrs.entrySet().toArray(newAttrArray(childAttrs.size()));
}
p.addLast(new ChannelInitializer<Channel>() {
@Override
public void initChannel(final Channel ch) throws Exception {
final ChannelPipeline pipeline = ch.pipeline();
ChannelHandler handler = config.handler();
if (handler != null) {
pipeline.addLast(handler);
}
ch.eventLoop().execute(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
pipeline.addLast(new ServerBootstrapAcceptor(
ch, currentChildGroup, currentChildHandler, currentChildOptions, currentChildAttrs));
}
});
}
});
}
351
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
