Mvel模板性能测试

Mvel的性能很不错（Mvel主要竞争对手是OGNL），这个是官方提供的性能数据，因为Mvel使用asm，采用了编译成java字节码的方式，其本质的性能应该和java代码的性能是类似的。不过在实际测试器模板的时候，其性能并没有非常突出：

测试代码：主要比较了完成同一个功能，java、velocity、mvel需要的时间

velocity对SimpleNode进行Cache之后进行测试，同样Mvel也是编译之后进行测试。发现两者的CPU性能相差不大，在同一数量级，而java则明显高很多，当然和java的写法也有关系。 看来还需要再看一下Mvel编译之后的代码！

 

public class Main {
	
 
	private static Map vars = new HashMap();
	private static  VelocityContext context = new VelocityContext();
	private static RuntimeInstance ri = new RuntimeInstance();
	static {
		Group g = new Group("group1");
		for (int i = 0; i < 20; i++) {
			g.addUser(new User(i, "user" + i));
		}
		vars.put("group", g);
		vars.put("name", "john");    
        context.put("group", g);
        context.put("name", "john");
	}
	private static String mvelTemplate = "Hello, my name is @{name.toUpperCase()},"
			+ " @foreach{user : group.users} - @{user.id} - @{user.name} " 
			+ " @end{}";
	private static String velocityTemplate = "Hello, my name is ${name.toUpperCase()},"
		+ "#foreach($user in $group.users) - ${user.id} - ${user.name}  #end " ;
	
	public static String java(Map vars ) {
		StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer();
		sb.append("Hello, my name is ");
		String name = (String)vars.get("name");
		sb.append(name.toUpperCase());
		Group group = (Group)vars.get("group");
		for (User u : group.getUsers()) {
			sb.append(" - ");
			sb.append(u.getId());
			sb.append(" - ");
			sb.append(u.getName());
		}
		return sb.toString();
	}
	/**
	 * @param args
	 * @throws Exception 
	 */
	public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
		Velocity.init();
		CompiledTemplate compiled = TemplateCompiler.compileTemplate(mvelTemplate);
		for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
			/** 未编译的mvel模板效率*/
			long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
			for (int n = 0; n < 10000; n ++) {
				TemplateRuntime.eval(mvelTemplate, vars);
			}
			long end = System.currentTimeMillis();
	
			System.out.println("Mvel.NoCompiled elapsed:" + (end - start) );
			/** 编译后的mvel模板效率*/
			start = System.currentTimeMillis();
			for (int n = 0; n < 10000; n ++) {
				TemplateRuntime.execute(compiled, vars);
			}
			end = System.currentTimeMillis();
		
			System.out.println("Mvel.Compiled elapsed:" + (end - start) );
			
			/** Velocity模板效率*/
			NullWriter writer = new NullWriter();
			SimpleNode snode =  ri.parse(velocityTemplate, "velocityTest" );
			start = System.currentTimeMillis();
		
			for (int n = 0; n < 10000; n ++) {
				 /* lets render a template */
				ri.render(context, writer, "velocityTest", snode);
//				Velocity.evaluate(context, writer, "velocityTest", velocityTemplate);
			}
			end = System.currentTimeMillis();
			System.out.println("Velocity Cache elapsed:" + (end - start) );
			/** Velocity模板效率*/
			//start = System.currentTimeMillis();
		
			//for (int n = 0; n < 10; n ++) {
				 /* lets render a template */
			//	Velocity.evaluate(context, writer, "velocityTest", velocityTemplate);
			//}
			//end = System.currentTimeMillis();
			//System.out.println("Velocity No Cache elapsed:" + (end - start) );
			
			/** java代码效率*/
			start = System.currentTimeMillis();
			for (int n = 0; n < 10000; n ++) {
				java(vars);
			}
			end = System.currentTimeMillis();
			System.out.println("Java elapsed:" + (end - start) );
		  
		}
	}

}

 

测试结果：

Mvel.NoCompiled elapsed:7970
Mvel.Compiled elapsed:359
Velocity Cache elapsed:625
Java elapsed:93

Mvel.NoCompiled elapsed:6250
Mvel.Compiled elapsed:328
Velocity Cache elapsed:578
Java elapsed:78

Mvel.NoCompiled elapsed:6710
Mvel.Compiled elapsed:328
Velocity Cache elapsed:562
Java elapsed:47

Mvel.NoCompiled elapsed:6090
Mvel.Compiled elapsed:343
Velocity Cache elapsed:516
Java elapsed:46

Mvel.NoCompiled elapsed:7190
Mvel.Compiled elapsed:312
Velocity Cache elapsed:515
Java elapsed:47

Mvel.NoCompiled elapsed:6090
Mvel.Compiled elapsed:297
Velocity Cache elapsed:530
Java elapsed:47

Mvel.NoCompiled elapsed:6250
Mvel.Compiled elapsed:297
Velocity Cache elapsed:515
Java elapsed:47

Mvel.NoCompiled elapsed:6090
Mvel.Compiled elapsed:312
Velocity Cache elapsed:515
Java elapsed:47

Mvel.NoCompiled elapsed:7810
Mvel.Compiled elapsed:328
Velocity Cache elapsed:530
Java elapsed:32

Mvel.NoCompiled elapsed:6090
Mvel.Compiled elapsed:359
Velocity Cache elapsed:531
Java elapsed:46