不推荐使用@Autowired 进行Field注入的原因

最新推荐文章于 2024-06-14 18:08:35 发布

π大星的日常

最新推荐文章于 2024-06-14 18:08:35 发布

阅读量1.7k

点赞数 1

分类专栏： java 文章标签： java spring 开发语言

本文链接：https://blog.csdn.net/m0_73311735/article/details/127261819

版权

今天写Spring项目的时候发现，在@Autowired上出现了一个警告

Field injection is not recommended （不建议使用字段注入） Inspection info: Reports injected or autowired fields in Spring components. The quick-fix suggests the recommended constructor-based dependency injection in beans and assertions for mandatory fields. Example: class MyComponent { @Inject MyCollaborator collaborator; // injected field

public void myBusinessMethod() { collaborator.doSomething(); // throws NullPointerException } }

After applying the quick-fix: class MyComponent {

private final MyCollaborator collaborator;

@Inject public MyComponent(MyCollaborator collaborator) { Assert.notNull(collaborator, "MyCollaborator must not be null!"); this.collaborator = collaborator; }

public void myBusinessMethod() { collaborator.doSomething(); // now this call is safe }

}

既然提示警告了，说明这种写法肯定存在利弊关系，立马上Google找原因，最后总结如下：

@AutoWired三种注入的方式

一共有三种：分别是（ Field-based Injection（属性注入），Setter-based Injection（set方法注入），Constructor-base Injection（构造器注入））

Constructor-base Injection（构造器注入）

public class DI {
    private DependencyA dependencyA;
    private DependencyB dependencyB;
    private DependencyC dependencyC;

    @Autowired
    public DI(DependencyA dependencyA, DependencyB dependencyB, DependencyC dependen