The Need to Control

shackles control things

I’ve been thinking a lot about what I call Middle Management Mentality, and define it as a need to assume ownership and control things even if one doesn’t have an idea how to do either. I guess that I wanted to pretend I would be able to navigate around this mindset no matter what. Like I was special…  

When I was in the Air Force, the status quo was to build up an empire around you, even if you were given something to manage that didn’t require an empire. Its just what everybody did… If you didn’t do it, you were wrong.
 
My last job in the Air Force had me commanding a detachment of one enlisted troop and four kids bedding.  I took the job knowing that it would end on my watch unless I could build it into something else. Despite my best efforts to find a new mission for the team, I just wasn’t able to make that happen. I was bred to build and control a mini empire and I was in the perfect place to do it, but I couldn’t. Not in the sense that I had failed, but rather in the sense that it just didn&rsquo, cheap wedding dress;t make sense, so I wouldn’t. My organization had been around for 10 years supporting a customer that had become self sufficient. We couldn’t add anymore value, so I figured out a way to close down shop.
 
We ran out of work for one of the contractors early on, and that fact coupled with it just not being a good fit led me down the path of doing more with less.  It wasn’t really doing more with less because this individual wasn’t really doing much. I gave two months bedding set, which was probably too much, and we moved on.
 
At the end of my three years, we had accomplished our mission and effectively ran out of things to do. We were set up to assist in cheap bedding down new trainer aircraft at pilot training bases. To put it plainly, we ran out of aircraft and bases. Job well done. At that point in time though, my instincts had evolved. Instead of clawing to save my organization, I made it go away when I left. My customers liked the idea, as they saw their budgets evaporating before their eyes, therefore my command liked the idea too.
 
It was the right thing to do.
 
That instinct is something that appeals to me about social technologies. The simplified formula looks like: Makes Sense = Do It, Doesn’t Make Sense = Don’t Do It. That instinct is the opposite of what I’ve seen among most middle managers in large organizations, however. The need to build and control at all costs runs rampant in large organizations from what I’ve seen. Middle Managers either see something that they want their name on or fear something that they don’t understand, or both, and the shackles get placed on progress until a whole new set of people come into the mix and start over. 
 
There is no passion in controlling something.
 
I think that this mentality needs to change before " cheap bedding" can truly transform large organizations. How that change will happen is anybody’s guess, but it has to happen. I buy into the idea of an internal groundswell but am unsure at this point if its enough. There may need to be a catalyst from the top to affect this kind of change.
 
I’m interested to read what you think about all this… Am I on to something, or way out of line? Would love to get your take on it.
相关的主题文章:
  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论
To connect a PID controller to a transfer function, we need to use the concept of feedback control. The transfer function represents the dynamics of the process, while the PID controller is used to adjust the input to the process based on the error between the desired output and the actual output. The general block diagram for a feedback control system with a PID controller and a transfer function is shown below: ``` +----------+ +---------+ | | | | r ---->| PID | u --------------->| Process | | Controller | | | | | | | +----------+ +---------+ | | | | | | +--------------- y -------------+ ``` where: - `r` is the desired output (setpoint) - `u` is the input to the process (control signal) - `y` is the actual output of the process - `PID Controller` is the block representing the PID controller - `Process` is the block representing the transfer function To connect the PID controller to the transfer function, we need to determine the transfer function of the entire system. This can be done by using block diagram algebra to simplify the system into a single transfer function. Assuming that the transfer function of the process is represented by `G(s)`, the transfer function of the entire system can be written as: ``` U(s) Y(s) = -------- * G(s) * E(s) 1 + G(s) * C(s) ``` where: - `U(s)` is the Laplace transform of the input signal `u` - `Y(s)` is the Laplace transform of the output signal `y` - `E(s)` is the Laplace transform of the error signal, which is the difference between the setpoint `r` and the actual output `y` - `C(s)` is the transfer function of the PID controller The transfer function of the PID controller is given by: ``` Kp + Ki/s + Kd*s C(s) = ------------------------ 1 ``` where: - `Kp` is the proportional gain - `Ki` is the integral gain - `Kd` is the derivative gain Once we have the transfer function of the entire system, we can use it to design the PID controller parameters (`Kp`, `Ki`, `Kd`) to achieve the desired performance. This can be done using various methods such as trial-and-error tuning, Ziegler-Nichols method, or model-based tuning.
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值