Android O - java.lang.RuntimeException: An error occurred while executing doInBackground()

最近任务列表中多了一个bug，让在这个sprint中解决掉，bug的堆栈信息如下：

Fatal Exception: java.lang.RuntimeException: An error occurred while executing doInBackground()
       at android.os.AsyncTask$3.done(AsyncTask.java:353)
       at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.finishCompletion(FutureTask.java:383)
       at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.setException(FutureTask.java:252)
       at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:271)
       at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1162)
       at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:636)
       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:764)
Caused by java.lang.SecurityException: Caller no longer running, last stopped +25s437ms because: timed out while starting
       at android.os.Parcel.readException(Parcel.java:1942)
       at android.os.Parcel.readException(Parcel.java:1888)
       at android.app.job.IJobCallback$Stub$Proxy.dequeueWork(IJobCallback.java:191)
       at android.app.job.JobParameters.dequeueWork(JobParameters.java:196)
       at android.support.v4.app.JobIntentService$JobServiceEngineImpl.dequeueWork(JobIntentService.java:309)
       at android.support.v4.app.JobIntentService.dequeueWork(JobIntentService.java:627)
       at android.support.v4.app.JobIntentService$CommandProcessor.doInBackground(JobIntentService.java:384)
       at android.support.v4.app.JobIntentService$CommandProcessor.doInBackground(JobIntentService.java:377)
       at android.os.AsyncTask$2.call(AsyncTask.java:333)
       at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
       at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1162)
       at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:636)
       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:764)

• 由上面的bug信息可知是调用了系统JobIntentService中的AsyncTask中的doInBackground所致, 而doInBackground又调用了dequeueWork，下面是源码部分（androidx 1.1.0的源码）：

  final class CommandProcessor extends AsyncTask<Void, Void, Void> {
      @Override
      protected Void doInBackground(Void... params) {
          GenericWorkItem work;
  
          if (DEBUG) Log.d(TAG, "Starting to dequeue work...");
  
          while ((work = dequeueWork()) != null) {
              if (DEBUG) Log.d(TAG, "Processing next work: " + work);
              onHandleWork(work.getIntent());
              if (DEBUG) Log.d(TAG, "Completing work: " + work);
              work.complete();
          }
  
          if (DEBUG) Log.d(TAG, "Done processing work!");
  
          return null;
      }
  

• dequeueWork()的源码如下, 我们关注mJobImpl != null的部分， 又会进入mJobImpl.dequeueWork()的部分：

  
      GenericWorkItem dequeueWork() {
          if (mJobImpl != null) {
              return mJobImpl.dequeueWork();
          } else {
              synchronized (mCompatQueue) {
                  if (mCompatQueue.size() > 0) {
                      return mCompatQueue.remove(0);
                  } else {
                      return null;
                  }
              }
          }
      }
  

• mJobImpl其实是一个CompatJobEngine类型，源码以及是实现类JobServiceEngineImpl如下：

  	interface CompatJobEngine {
     		 IBinder compatGetBinder();
      	GenericWorkItem dequeueWork();
      }
  
  	@RequiresApi(26)
  	 static final class JobServiceEngineImpl extends JobServiceEngine
          implements JobIntentService.CompatJobEngine {
  	 @Override
          public JobIntentService.GenericWorkItem dequeueWork() {
              JobWorkItem work;
              synchronized (mLock) {
                  if (mParams == null) {
                      return null;
                  }
                  work = mParams.dequeueWork();
              }
              if (work != null) {
                  work.getIntent().setExtrasClassLoader(mService.getClassLoader());
                  return new WrapperWorkItem(work);
              } else {
                  return null;
              }
          }
      }
  

• 从文章开头的bug信息中看到，接着又进入到了mParams.dequeueWork();中，然后就进入到了Binder机制中，源码如下，由此可以断定是在这里出了问题，抛出了异常，但是因为这里属于源码部分，不应该属于我们的职责范围。

  	public @Nullable JobWorkItem dequeueWork() {
      try {
          return getCallback().dequeueWork(getJobId());
      } catch (RemoteException e) {
          throw e.rethrowFromSystemServer();
      }
  }
  		/** @hide */
      @UnsupportedAppUsage
      public IJobCallback getCallback() {
          return IJobCallback.Stub.asInterface(callback);
      }
  

• 经过查询源码，发现问题出现在framework层，而且网上早已有这个问题的issue:
  https://github.com/evernote/android-job/issues/255
  https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/63622293

• 网上遇到这类问题的人很多很多，但是到目前为止，我查看了最新的google的androidx库("androidx.core:core-ktx:1.2.0-rc01")，依旧是没有解决这个问题。

• 其实查看源码后发现解决这个问题的方法也比较简单，就是我们可以新建一个androidx.core.app的包，在其中新建一个类SafeJobIntentService继承JobIntentService, 之所以这么做是因为dequeueWork()方法的权限不是public，我们得写在同一个包中才能重写它的方法，进行bug的修复。

  @RestrictTo({Scope.LIBRARY})
  public abstract class SafeJobIntentService extends JobIntentService {
      public SafeJobIntentService() {
      }
  
      GenericWorkItem dequeueWork() {
          try {
              return super.dequeueWork();//1 这里我们对此方法进行了try/catch操作
          } catch (SecurityException var2) {
              var2.printStackTrace();
              return null;
          }
      }
  
      public void onCreate() {
          super.onCreate();
          if (VERSION.SDK_INT >= 26) {
              this.mJobImpl = new SafeJobServiceEngineImpl(this);
          } else {
              this.mJobImpl = null;
          }
      }
  }
  
  @RequiresApi(26)
  public class SafeJobServiceEngineImpl extends JobServiceEngine implements CompatJobEngine {
      static final String TAG = "JobServiceEngineImpl";
      static final boolean DEBUG = false;
      final JobIntentService mService;
      final Object mLock = new Object();
      JobParameters mParams;
  
      SafeJobServiceEngineImpl(JobIntentService service) {
          super(service);
          this.mService = service;
      }
  
      public IBinder compatGetBinder() {
          return this.getBinder();
      }
  
      public boolean onStartJob(JobParameters params) {
          this.mParams = params;
          this.mService.ensureProcessorRunningLocked(false);
          return true;
      }
  
      public boolean onStopJob(JobParameters params) {
          boolean result = this.mService.doStopCurrentWork();
          synchronized(this.mLock) {
              this.mParams = null;
              return result;
          }
      }
  
      public GenericWorkItem dequeueWork() {
          JobWorkItem work = null;
          synchronized(this.mLock) {
              if (this.mParams == null) {
                  return null;
              }
  
              try {
                  work = this.mParams.dequeueWork();
              } catch (SecurityException var5) {
                  var5.printStackTrace();
              }
          }
  
          if (work != null) {
              work.getIntent().setExtrasClassLoader(this.mService.getClassLoader());
              return new SafeJobServiceEngineImpl.WrapperWorkItem(work);
          } else {
              return null;
          }
      }
  
      final class WrapperWorkItem implements GenericWorkItem {
          final JobWorkItem mJobWork;
  
          WrapperWorkItem(JobWorkItem jobWork) {
              this.mJobWork = jobWork;
          }
  
          public Intent getIntent() {
              return this.mJobWork.getIntent();
          }
  
          public void complete() {
              synchronized(SafeJobServiceEngineImpl.this.mLock) {
                  if (SafeJobServiceEngineImpl.this.mParams != null) {
                      try {
                          SafeJobServiceEngineImpl.this.mParams.completeWork(this.mJobWork);
                      } catch (SecurityException  | IllegalArgumentException var4) {
                      // 2 这里我们也对completeWork进行了try/catch操作
                          var4.printStackTrace();
                      }
                  }
              }
          }
      }
  }
  

• 上面的代码是在源码的基础上仅仅在1和2处做了Exception的处理，其余的地方没有变化，可以对比源码查看比较。

• 如果你的项目中有的三方库中已经引入了这个SafeJobIntentService类，但是因为你使用不了它们的这个类，而你再引用比如implementation 'com.evernote:android-job:1.4.2'库的话，就会出现duplicate class found in the module, 如果出现这种问题，我们可以通过重新命名类的方式，按照上面的代码来做处理就好了。

• 希望Google在未来的库中加入这个问题的解决办法。

JSON三种数据解析方法