直接贴代码:
先定义一个接口:
package example.proxy;
public interface Animal {
String say();
String food();
}
再来个实现类:
package example.proxy;
public class Dog implements Animal{
@Override
public String say() {
System.out.println("汪");
return "汪";
}
@Override
public String food() {
System.out.println("骨头");
return "骨头";
}
}
测试,jdk动态代理和cglib代理对比:
package example.proxy;
import org.springframework.cglib.proxy.Enhancer;
import org.springframework.cglib.proxy.MethodInterceptor;
import java.lang.reflect.Proxy;
public class ProxyMain {
public static void main(String[] args) {
cglibProxy();
}
public static void cglibProxy() {
Dog dog = new Dog();
Enhancer enhancer = new Enhancer();
// enhancer.setSuperclass(Dog.class);
enhancer.setInterfaces(new Class[]{Animal.class}); //注意这里需要设置代理的接口class数组
enhancer.setCallback((MethodInterceptor) (o, method, objects, methodProxy) -> {
System.out.println("start");
Object invoke = methodProxy.invoke(dog, objects);
System.out.println("end");
return invoke;
});
// enhancer.setUseCache(false);
Animal o = (Animal) enhancer.create();
o.food();
}
public static void jdkProxy() {
Dog dog = new Dog();
Animal instance = (Animal) Proxy.newProxyInstance(Dog.class.getClassLoader(), Dog.class.getInterfaces(), (proxy, method, args1) -> {
System.out.println("start");
Object invoke = method.invoke(dog, args1);
System.out.println("end");
return invoke;
});
instance.food();
instance.say();
}
}
执行结果:
start
骨头
end
总结:其实cglib可jdk的动态代理很类似,最终都是通过被代理类执行原始方法,只是jdk使用的是反射,cglib使用的fastcalss机制。