XJTLU Entrepreneur College (Taicang) Cover Sheet python代做[v:1433104253]

XJTLU Entrepreneur College (Taicang) Cover Sheet

Module code and Title	DTS201TC Pattern Recognition
School Title	School of AI and Advanced Computing
Assignment Title	Coursework (Groupwork)
Submission Deadline	17:00 23rd Oct.
Final Word Count	NAN
If you agree to let the university use your work anonymously for teaching and learning purposes, please type “yes” here.

I certify that I have read and understood the University’s Policy for dealing with Plagiarism, Collusion and the Fabrication of Data (available on Learning Mall Online). With reference to this policy I certify that:

 My work does not contain any instances of plagiarism and/or collusion.

My work does not contain any fabricated data.

By uploading my assignment onto Learning Mall Online, I formally declare that all of the above information is true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Scor				ing – For Tutor Use
Student ID
Stage of Marking		Marker Code	Learning Outcomes Achieved （F/P/M/D） (please modify as appropriate)				Final Score
			A	B	C	D
1st Marker – red pen
Moderation – green pen		IM Initials	The original mark has been accepted by the moderator (please circle as appropriate):				Y / N
			Data entry and score calculation have been checked by another tutor (please circle):				Y
2nd Marker if needed – green pen
For Academic Office Use			Possible Academic Infringement (please tick as appropriate)
Date Receive d	Day s late	Late Penalt y	☐ Category A		Total Academic Infringement Penalty (A,B, C, D, E, Please modify where necessary) _____________________
			☐  Category B
			☐  Category C
			☐  Category D
			☐  Category E

1 Groupwork [100 marks]

Music Classification/Clustering

Assessment Task:

• Choose an paper related with font
• Build one model to implement ONE task from blow:
  • Genre classification
  • Mood recognition
  • Instrument identification
  • Music recommendation

Requirements:

1. You are expected to implement a classification/clustering model, to which end, you need to understand and explain your models, manage and analyze the dataset and its features, implement the models, make evaluation and analysis.
2. The programming language should be Python.
3. You are free to use any PR/ML/DL models.
4. The assessment includes both report and the codes.
5. Individual mark is decided by groupwork mark and peer assessment mark. The formula is shown below.

Final Grade = Peer Assessment Weight ∗ Student Contribution ∗ Group Grade

+ (1 − Peer Assessment Weight) ∗ Group Grade

where, the Student Contribution is calculated by LMO Peer Assessment activity.

1. One group need to implement at least one model. • If the number of models is more than one, the second part of the group work marks(marking criteria 2) would be total marks of all models divided by the number of models.
   • If 0 models are submitted, the total marks would be 0.
   • Quality is more important than quantity.
     • Quality refers to whether the models are implemented well with good understanding and proper illustration in the report.
     • Quantity refers to number of the models, length of report.
   • Code submitted should be able to run properly and the results should align with the report.
   • If a model’s implementation is referred to online resources, e.g., github, to a great extent, it should be clearly and formally noted in reference. Otherwise, it would be suspected as plagiarism, and therefore the marks for this model could be 0.
   • If a model’s implementation is referred to online resources, e.g., github, but you have contributions to it to improve the model, it should also be clearly and formally noted in reference. And you contributions should also be noted. • The baseline classification accuracy is 10%, the performance (efficiency/accuracy) of a model will not be additionally evaluated as long as it is above the baseline. The choice of library is not within the evaluation.
   • The mark of the groupwork consists of 3 components, shown in detailed marking criteria below.

Marking Criteria:

1. [45 marks] Investigating the dataset.

Table 1: Marking scheme 1

Rubrics	Marks	Details
Dataset description	20	5 marks: list one or more datasets you find useful
		5 marks: describe properties of each dataset
		5 marks: pros & cons of each dataset
		5 marks: proper references
Feature selection	10	5 marks: describe what features are selected for you model
		5 marks: plausible reasons
Feature analysis	15	5 marks: introduce possible feature extraction methods in terms of music data
		5 marks: investigate and experiment on the data you selected
		5 marks: demonstrate the features with figures(numbers), plots or tables

1. [40 marks] Description of the models, parameters, and evaluation on the performance over the model.

Table 2: Marking scheme 2

Rubrics	Marks	Details
Description	10	5 marks: workflow
		5 marks: model description (e.g., theory, functionality, etc.)
Implementation	20	5 marks: codes can run properly and the results align with report
		5 marks: introduce the hardware you use (e.g., CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.)
		5 marks: include model parameters estimation procedure
		5 marks: training procedure description
Evaluation	10	5 marks: demonstrate results with figures(numbers)
		5 marks: demonstrate results with plots or tables

1. [15 marks] Comprehensive analysis.

Table 3: Marking scheme 3

Rubrics	Marks	Details
Discussion	5	pros&cons of your model
Conclusion	5	a short summary on orientation of the work, how you did it, what results you got, and possbile improvement in future
Novelty	5	new ideas

Note: for each item in the tables above, the work will be marked with the standard below:

• • excellent = 5 mark
  • good = 3.5 marks
  • fair = 1.5 marks
  • poor = 0 marks

2 Peer Assessment [weight : 20%]

Table 4: Peer Assessment Rubrics

MARKS	5	4	2	0
Contributions	Rountinely provides useful ideas when participating in the group discussion. A leader who contributes a lot of effort.	Usually provides useful ideas when participating in the group discussion. A strong group member who tries hard.	Sometimes provides useful ideas when participating in the group discussion. A satisfactory group member who does what is required.	Rarely provides useful ideas when participating in the group discussion. May refuse to participate.
Problem solving	Actively looks for and suggests solutions to problems.	Refines solutions suggested by others.	Does not suggest or refine solutions, but is willing try out solutions suggested by others.	Does not try to solve problems or help others solve problems. Lets others do the work.
Focus on the task	Consistently stays focused on the task and what needs to be one. Very self-directed.	Focuses on the task and that needs to be done most of the time. Other group members can count on this person.	Focuses on the task and what needs to be done some of the time. Other group members must sometimes nag, prod, and remind to keep this person on task.	Rarely focuses on the task and what needs to be done Lets others do the work.
Working with others	Almost always listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others. Tries to keep people working well together.	Usually listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others. Does not cause ”waves” in the group.	Often listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others, but sometimes is not a good team member.	Rarely listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others. Often is not a good team player.