前言
在高并发场景下System.currentTimeMillis()并发问题严重,甚至比创建一个普通对象要耗时的多;在系统中有时候不可避免要打印一些时间戳,但怎么做才更好呢。
代码实现
iimport java.util.concurrent.Executors;
import java.util.concurrent.ScheduledExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLong;
/**
* 高并发场景下System.currentTimeMillis()的性能问题的优化
* 时间戳打印建议使用
*/
public class SystemClock {
private static final String THREAD_NAME = "system.clock";
private static final SystemClock MILLIS_CLOCK = new SystemClock(1);
private final long precision;
private final AtomicLong now;
private SystemClock(long precision) {
this.precision = precision;
now = new AtomicLong(System.currentTimeMillis());
scheduleClockUpdating();
}
public static SystemClock millisClock() {
return MILLIS_CLOCK;
}
private void scheduleClockUpdating() {
ScheduledExecutorService scheduler = Executors.newSingleThreadScheduledExecutor(runnable -> {
Thread thread = new Thread(runnable, THREAD_NAME);
thread.setDaemon(true);
return thread;
});
scheduler.scheduleAtFixedRate(() ->
now.set(System.currentTimeMillis()), precision, precision, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
}
public long now() {
return now.get();
}
}
调用示例
Long start = SystemClock.millisClock().now()
测试对比
public static void main(String[] args) {
int times=Integer.MAX_VALUE;
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (long i = 0; i < times; i++) {
SystemClock.millisClock().now();
}
long end = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("SystemClock Time:" + (end - start) + "毫秒");
long start2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (long i = 0; i < times; i++) {
System.currentTimeMillis();
}
long end2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("SystemCurrentTimeMillis Time:" + (end2 - start2) + "毫秒");
}
输出结果是:
SystemClock Time:2741毫秒
SystemCurrentTimeMillis Time:14072毫秒
五倍的效率
细节决定成败,敬畏每一行代码,代码优化永无止境!
关注程序员小强公众号更多编程趣事,知识心得与您分享