测试代码
public void acquireItem(Long uid, Long itemId, IdempotentEnum idempotentEnum, String businessId) {
doAcquireItem(uid, itemId, idempotent);
}
@Transactional
public void doAcquireItem(Long uid, Long itemId, String idempotent) {
UserBackpack insert = UserBackpack.builder()
.uid(uid)
.itemId(itemId)
.status(YesOrNoEnum.NO.getStatus())
.idempotent(idempotent)
.build();
userBackpackDao.save(insert);
int i=1/0;
}
测试结果:数据库插入了数据,证明@Transactional在同类中调用失效
原因参考:https://www.cnblogs.com/ynyhl/articles/12066530.html
常用解决方案:
- 获取本对象的代理对象,再进行调用
((UserBackpackServiceImpl)AopContext.currentProxy()).doAcquireItem(uid, itemId, idempotent);
- 用@Autowired 注入自己 然后在用注入的bean调用自己的方法,要加@Lazy防止循环依赖
@Lazy
@Autowired
UserBackpackServiceImpl userBackpackServiceImpl;
public void acquireItem(Long uid, Long itemId, IdempotentEnum idempotentEnum, String businessId) {
userBackpackServiceImpl.doAcquireItem(uid, itemId, idempotent);
}
@Transactional
public void doAcquireItem(Long uid, Long itemId, String idempotent) {
UserBackpack insert = UserBackpack.builder()
.uid(uid)
.itemId(itemId)
.status(YesOrNoEnum.NO.getStatus())
.idempotent(idempotent)
.build();
userBackpackDao.save(insert);
int i=1/0;
}
经测试,以上两种都可以解决