fmt::format 性能测试

__int256

于 2024-05-08 18:47:34 发布

阅读量162

点赞数 1

文章标签： c++ 数据结构

本文链接：https://blog.csdn.net/qq_42917242/article/details/138582000

版权

fmt::format 性能测试

结论

O0 下
fmt 比直接用 string 相加快很多，略弱于reserve 后 append

O2 下
fmt 是最快的，append反而是最慢的

无脑用fmt

测试代码

#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <fmt/format.h>
#include <gtest/gtest.h>
const int N = 10000000;
std::string a{"hello"}, b{"world"}, c{"end"};
TEST(fmtTest, fmt) {

    // std::string a{"hello"}, b{"world"}, c{"end"};
    for(int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
        auto d = fmt::format("%s_%s_%s", a, b, c);
    }
}
TEST(stringTest, add) {
    // std::string a{"hello"}, b{"world"}, c{"end"};
    for(int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
        auto d = a + "_" + b + "_" + c;
    }
}
TEST(charTest, add) {
    // std::string a{"hello"}, b{"world"}, c{"end"};
    for(int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
        std::string s;
        s.resize(a.size() + b.size() + c.size() + 2);
        for(int j = 0; j < a.size(); j++) {
            s[j] = a[j];
        }
        s[a.size()] = '_';
        int base = a.size() + 1;
        for(int j = 0; j < b.size(); j++) {
            s[base + j] = b[j];
        }
        s[base + b.size()] = '_';
        base += b.size() + 1;
        for(int j = 0; j < c.size(); j++) {
            s[base + j] = c[j];
        }
    }
}
TEST(stirngTest, append) {
    // std::string a{"hello"}, b{"world"}, c{"end"};
    for(int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
        std::string s;
        s.reserve(a.size() + b.size() + 1);
        s.append(a);
        s.append("_");
        s.append(b);
        s.append("_");
        s.append(c);
    }
}
int main(int argc, char** argv) {
    srand(time(0));
    a += rand() % 26 + 'a';
    b += rand() % 26 + 'a';
    c += rand() % 26 + 'a';
    testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv);
    return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
}

output

[==========] Running 4 tests from 4 test suites.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 1 test from fmtTest
[ RUN      ] fmtTest.fmt
[       OK ] fmtTest.fmt (1787 ms)
[----------] 1 test from fmtTest (1787 ms total)

[----------] 1 test from stringTest
[ RUN      ] stringTest.add
[       OK ] stringTest.add (3742 ms)
[----------] 1 test from stringTest (3742 ms total)

[----------] 1 test from charTest
[ RUN      ] charTest.add
[       OK ] charTest.add (6422 ms)
[----------] 1 test from charTest (6422 ms total)

[----------] 1 test from stirngTest
[ RUN      ] stirngTest.append
[       OK ] stirngTest.append (1663 ms)
[----------] 1 test from stirngTest (1663 ms total)

[----------] Global test environment tear-down
[==========] 4 tests from 4 test suites ran. (13617 ms total)
[  PASSED  ] 4 tests.

[==========] Running 4 tests from 4 test suites.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 1 test from fmtTest
[ RUN      ] fmtTest.fmt
[       OK ] fmtTest.fmt (254 ms)
[----------] 1 test from fmtTest (254 ms total)

[----------] 1 test from stringTest
[ RUN      ] stringTest.add
[       OK ] stringTest.add (374 ms)
[----------] 1 test from stringTest (374 ms total)

[----------] 1 test from charTest
[ RUN      ] charTest.add
[       OK ] charTest.add (268 ms)
[----------] 1 test from charTest (268 ms total)

[----------] 1 test from stirngTest
[ RUN      ] stirngTest.append
[       OK ] stirngTest.append (472 ms)
[----------] 1 test from stirngTest (472 ms total)

[----------] Global test environment tear-down
[==========] 4 tests from 4 test suites ran. (1370 ms total)
[  PASSED  ] 4 tests.