JAVA中所有的类都继承自Object类，就从Object作为源码解析的开始。
注： 以上绿色方法为 非native方法 粉色方法为 native方法）
1、什么是native方法？
native关键字标识的java方法为本地方法，底层是有c/c++编写的程序编译后dll文件，java加载dll文件后，可用通过本地方法调用dll中函数,如有疑问可用参考JNI使用方式。
看参考：http://blog.csdn.net/yangjiali014/article/details/1633017
以下为Object类对应openjdk\jdk\src\share\native\java\lang\Object.c的源码片段：
static JNINativeMethod methods[] = {
{"hashCode", "()I", (void *)&JVM_IHashCode},
{"wait", "(J)V", (void *)&JVM_MonitorWait},
{"notify", "()V", (void *)&JVM_MonitorNotify},
{"notifyAll", "()V", (void *)&JVM_MonitorNotifyAll},
{"clone", "()Ljava/lang/Object;", (void *)&JVM_Clone},
};
/*
* Copyright (c) 1994, 2012, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
* ORACLE PROPRIETARY/CONFIDENTIAL. Use is subject to license terms.
*/
package java.lang;
/**
* Class {@code Object} is the root of the class hierarchy(类层次结构).
* Every class has {@code Object} as a superclass. All objects,
* including arrays, implement the methods of this class.
*
* @author unascribed
* @see java.lang.Class
* @since JDK1.0
*/
public class Object {
/* Object():默认构造函数（源码无系统默认提供）*/
/*
一个本地方法，具体是用C（C++）在DLL中实现的，然后通过JNI调用。
JNIEXPORT void JNICALL
Java_java_lang_Object_registerNatives(JNIEnv *env, jclass cls)
{
(*env)->RegisterNatives(env, cls,
methods, sizeof(methods)/sizeof(methods[0]));
}
*/
private static native void registerNatives();
static {
/* 对象初始化时自动调用此方法*/
registerNatives();
}
/**
* Returns the runtime class of this {@code Object}. The returned
* {@code Class} object is the object that is locked by {@code
* static synchronized} methods of the represented class.
*
* <p><b>The actual result type is {@code Class<? extends |X|>}
* where {@code |X|} is the erasure of the static type of the
* expression on which {@code getClass} is called.</b> For
* example, no cast is required in this code fragment:</p>
*
* <p>
* {@code Number n = 0; }<br>
* {@code Class<? extends Number> c = n.getClass(); }
* </p>
*
* @return The {@code Class} object that represents the runtime
* class of this object.
* @jls 15.8.2 Class Literals
*/
/* 返回此 Object 的运行时类。
public class tests {
public static void main(String[] args)
{
A te = new B();
System.out.println(te.getClass());
}
}
class A {
}
class B extends A {
}
运行结果：class B
*/
public final native Class<?> getClass();
/**
* Returns a hash code value for the object. This method is
* supported for the benefit of hash tables such as those provided by
* {@link java.util.HashMap}.
* <p>
* The general contract(通用约定) of {@code hashCode} is:
* <ul>
* <li>Whenever it is invoked on the same object more than once(不止一次) during
* an execution(执行) of a Java application, the {@code hashCode} method
* must consistently(一致的) return the same integer, provided no information
* used in {@code equals} comparisons on the object is modified.
* This integer need not remain(保持) consistent from one execution of an
* application to another execution of the same application.
* <li>If two objects are equal according to the {@code equals(Object)}
* method, then calling the {@code hashCode} method on each of
* the two objects must produce the same integer result.
* <li>It is <em>not</em> required that if two objects are unequal
* according to the {@link java.lang.Object#equals(java.lang.Object)}
* method, then calling the {@code hashCode} method on each of the
* two objects must produce distinct integer results. However, the
* programmer should be aware that producing distinct integer results
* for unequal objects may improve the performance of hash tables.
* </ul>
* <p>
* As much as is reasonably practical, the hashCode method defined by
* class {@code Object} does return distinct integers for distinct
* objects. (This is typically implemented by converting the internal
* address of the object into an integer, but this implementation
* technique is not required by the
* Java™ programming language.)
*
* @return a hash code value for this object.
* @see java.lang.Object#equals(java.lang.Object)
* @see java.lang.System#identityHashCode
*/
/*
hashCode 的常规协定是：
1.在应用程序执行期间，如果一个对象用于equals()方法的属性没有被修改的话，
那么要保证对该对象多次返回的hashcode值要相等。
2.如果2个对象通过equals()方法判断的结果为true，那么要保证二者的hashcode值相等。
3.如果2个对象通过equals()方法判断的结果为false，那么对二者hashcode值是否相等并没有明确要求。
如果不相等，那么能够提升散列表的性能。
实际hashCode的计算方法
public int hashCode() {
int h = hash;
if (h == 0 && value.length > 0) {
char val[] = value;
for (int i = 0; i < value.length; i++) {
h = 31 * h + val[i];
}
hash = h;
}
return h;
}
*/
public native int hashCode();
/**
* Indicates whether some other object is "equal to" this one.
* <p>
* The {@code equals} method implements an equivalence relation
* on non-null object references:
* <ul>
* <li>It is <i>reflexive</i>: for any non-null reference value
* {@code x}, {@code x.equals(x)} should return
* {@code true}.
* <li>It is <i>symmetric</i>: for any non-null reference values
* {@code x} and {@code y}, {@code x.equals(y)}
* should return {@code true} if and only if
* {@code y.equals(x)} returns {@code true}.
* <li>It is <i>transitive</i>: for any non-null reference values
* {@code x}, {@code y}, and {@code z}, if
* {@code x.equals(y)} returns {@code true} and
* {@code y.equals(z)} returns {@code true}, then
* {@code x.equals(z)} should return {@code true}.
* <li>It is <i>consistent</i>: for any non-null reference values
* {@code x} and {@code y}, multiple invocations of
* {@code x.equals(y)} consistently return {@code true}
* or consistently return {@code false}, provided no
* information used in {@code equals} comparisons on the
* objects is modified.
* <li>For any non-null reference value {@code x},
* {@code x.equals(null)} should return {@code false}.
* </ul>
* <p>
* The {@code equals} method for class {@code Object} implements
* the most discriminating possible equivalence relation on objects;
* that is, for any non-null reference values {@code x} and
* {@code y}, this method returns {@code true} if and only
* if {@code x} and {@code y} refer to the same object
* ({@code x == y} has the value {@code true}).
* <p>
* Note that it is generally necessary to override the {@code hashCode}
* method whenever this method is overridden, so as to maintain the
* general contract for the {@code hashCode} method, which states
* that equal objects must have equal hash codes.
*
* @param obj the reference object with which to compare.
* @return {@code true} if this object is the same as the obj
* argument; {@code false} otherwise.
* @see #hashCode()
* @see java.util.HashMap
*/
/*
从这里我们可以看到，equals（obj）方法最根本的实现就是‘==’，因此对于一些自定义类，如果没有重写hashcode（）方法和equals（）方法的话，利用‘==’和equals()方法比较的结果是一样的。对于‘==’比较的是地址，equals()方法比较的是内容这种说法，是片面的。（虽然在最常用的String类中是这样的）。
一般重写方法：
public boolean equals(Object anObject) {
if (this == anObject) {
return true;
}
if (anObject instanceof String) {
String anotherString = (String)anObject;
int n = value.length;
if (n == anotherString.value.length) {
char v1[] = value;
char v2[] = anotherString.value;
int i = 0;
while (n-- != 0) {
if (v1[i] != v2[i])
return false;
i++;
}
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
*/
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
return (this == obj);
}
/**
* Creates and returns a copy of this object. The precise meaning
* of "copy" may depend on the class of the object. The general
* intent is that, for any object {@code x}, the expression:
* <blockquote>
* <pre>
* x.clone() != x</pre></blockquote>
* will be true, and that the expression:
* <blockquote>
* <pre>
* x.clone().getClass() == x.getClass()</pre></blockquote>
* will be {@code true}, but these are not absolute requirements.
* While it is typically the case that:
* <blockquote>
* <pre>
* x.clone().equals(x)</pre></blockquote>
* will be {@code true}, this is not an absolute requirement.
* <p>
* By convention, the returned object should be obtained by calling
* {@code super.clone}. If a class and all of its superclasses (except
* {@code Object}) obey this convention, it will be the case that
* {@code x.clone().getClass() == x.getClass()}.
* <p>
* By convention, the object returned by this method should be independent
* of this object (which is being cloned). To achieve this independence,
* it may be necessary to modify one or more fields of the object returned
* by {@code super.clone} before returning it. Typically, this means
* copying any mutable objects that comprise the internal "deep structure"
* of the object being cloned and replacing the references to these
* objects with references to the copies. If a class contains only
* primitive fields or references to immutable objects, then it is usually
* the case that no fields in the object returned by {@code super.clone}
* need to be modified.
* <p>
* The method {@code clone} for class {@code Object} performs a
* specific cloning operation. First, if the class of this object does
* not implement the interface {@code Cloneable}, then a
* {@code CloneNotSupportedException} is thrown. Note that all arrays
* are considered to implement the interface {@code Cloneable} and that
* the return type of the {@code clone} method of an array type {@code T[]}
* is {@code T[]} where T is any reference or primitive type.
* Otherwise, this method creates a new instance of the class of this
* object and initializes all its fields with exactly the contents of
* the corresponding fields of this object, as if by assignment; the
* contents of the fields are not themselves cloned. Thus, this method
* performs a "shallow copy" of this object, not a "deep copy" operation.
* <p>
* The class {@code Object} does not itself implement the interface
* {@code Cloneable}, so calling the {@code clone} method on an object
* whose class is {@code Object} will result in throwing an
* exception at run time.
*
* @return a clone of this instance.
* @throws CloneNotSupportedException if the object's class does not
* support the {@code Cloneable} interface. Subclasses
* that override the {@code clone} method can also
* throw this exception to indicate that an instance cannot
* be cloned.
* @see java.lang.Cloneable
*/
/*
本地CLONE方法，用于对象的复制。
native方法位于openjdk\hotspot\src\share\vm\prims\jvm.cpp中 JVM_Clone的实现片段
JVM_ENTRY(jobject, JVM_Clone(JNIEnv* env, jobject handle))
JVMWrapper("JVM_Clone");
Handle obj(THREAD, JNIHandles::resolve_non_null(handle));
const KlassHandle klass (THREAD, obj->klass());
JvmtiVMObjectAllocEventCollector oam;
#ifdef ASSERT
// Just checking that the cloneable flag is set correct
if (obj->is_javaArray()) {
guarantee(klass->is_cloneable(), "all arrays are cloneable");
} else {
guarantee(obj->is_instance(), "should be instanceOop");
bool cloneable = klass->is_subtype_of(SystemDictionary::Cloneable_klass());
guarantee(cloneable == klass->is_cloneable(), "incorrect cloneable flag");
}
#endif
// Check if class of obj supports the Cloneable interface.
// All arrays are considered to be cloneable (See JLS 20.1.5)
if (!klass->is_cloneable()) {
ResourceMark rm(THREAD);
THROW_MSG_0(vmSymbols::java_lang_CloneNotSupportedException(), klass->external_name());
}
// Make shallow object copy
const int size = obj->size();
oop new_obj = NULL;
if (obj->is_javaArray()) {
const int length = ((arrayOop)obj())->length();
new_obj = CollectedHeap::array_allocate(klass, size, length, CHECK_NULL);
} else {
new_obj = CollectedHeap::obj_allocate(klass, size, CHECK_NULL);
}
// 4839641 (4840070): We must do an oop-atomic copy, because if another thread
// is modifying a reference field in the clonee, a non-oop-atomic copy might
// be suspended in the middle of copying the pointer and end up with parts
// of two different pointers in the field. Subsequent dereferences will crash.
// 4846409: an oop-copy of objects with long or double fields or arrays of same
// won't copy the longs/doubles atomically in 32-bit vm's, so we copy jlongs instead
// of oops. We know objects are aligned on a minimum of an jlong boundary.
// The same is true of StubRoutines::object_copy and the various oop_copy
// variants, and of the code generated by the inline_native_clone intrinsic.
assert(MinObjAlignmentInBytes >= BytesPerLong, "objects misaligned");
Copy::conjoint_jlongs_atomic((jlong*)obj(), (jlong*)new_obj,
(size_t)align_object_size(size) / HeapWordsPerLong);
// Clear the header
new_obj->init_mark();
// Store check (mark entire object and let gc sort it out)
BarrierSet* bs = Universe::heap()->barrier_set();
assert(bs->has_write_region_opt(), "Barrier set does not have write_region");
bs->write_region(MemRegion((HeapWord*)new_obj, size));
// Caution: this involves a java upcall, so the clone should be
// "gc-robust" by this stage.
if (klass->has_finalizer()) {
assert(obj->is_instance(), "should be instanceOop");
new_obj = instanceKlass::register_finalizer(instanceOop(new_obj), CHECK_NULL);
}
return JNIHandles::make_local(env, oop(new_obj));
JVM_END
看不懂没关系，大概意思就是数组类型默认可以直接克隆，而其他对象实现clone需要先实现Cloneable接口，否则抛出CloneNotSupportedException异常
1、一般native方法比非native方法的执行效率高
2、clone生成的新对象与原对象的关系，需要区别2个对象建是否存在相同的引用或对应的内存地址是否存在共用情况，若存在则 该次clone为 “浅复制”，否则为“深复制”, 而且Object的clone方法是属于 “浅复制”。
*/
protected native Object clone() throws CloneNotSupportedException;
/**
* Returns a string representation of the object. In general, the
* {@code toString} method returns a string that
* "textually represents" this object. The result should
* be a concise but informative representation that is easy for a
* person to read.
* It is recommended that all subclasses override this method.
* <p>
* The {@code toString} method for class {@code Object}
* returns a string consisting of the name of the class of which the
* object is an instance, the at-sign character `{@code @}', and
* the unsigned hexadecimal representation of the hash code of the
* object. In other words, this method returns a string equal to the
* value of:
* <blockquote>
* <pre>
* getClass().getName() + '@' + Integer.toHexString(hashCode())
* </pre></blockquote>
*
* @return a string representation of the object.
*/
/*
返回该对象的字符串表示。非常重要的方法
默认返回对象的名称及引用地址，但一般被子类重写用于说明子类相关属性值描述
*/
public String toString() {
return getClass().getName() + "@" + Integer.toHexString(hashCode());
}
/**
* Wakes up a single thread that is waiting on this object's
* monitor. If any threads are waiting on this object, one of them
* is chosen to be awakened. The choice is arbitrary and occurs at
* the discretion of the implementation. A thread waits on an object's
* monitor by calling one of the {@code wait} methods.
* <p>
* The awakened thread will not be able to proceed until the current
* thread relinquishes the lock on this object. The awakened thread will
* compete in the usual manner with any other threads that might be
* actively competing to synchronize on this object; for example, the
* awakened thread enjoys no reliable privilege or disadvantage in being
* the next thread to lock this object.
* <p>
* This method should only be called by a thread that is the owner
* of this object's monitor. A thread becomes the owner of the
* object's monitor in one of three ways:
* <ul>
* <li>By executing a synchronized instance method of that object.
* <li>By executing the body of a {@code synchronized} statement
* that synchronizes on the object.
* <li>For objects of type {@code Class,} by executing a
* synchronized static method of that class.
* </ul>
* <p>
* Only one thread at a time can own an object's monitor.
*
* @throws IllegalMonitorStateException if the current thread is not
* the owner of this object's monitor.
* @see java.lang.Object#notifyAll()
* @see java.lang.Object#wait()
*/
/*不能被重写，唤醒在此对象监视器上等待的单个线程。*/
public final native void notify();
/**
* Wakes up all threads that are waiting on this object's monitor. A
* thread waits on an object's monitor by calling one of the
* {@code wait} methods.
* <p>
* The awakened threads will not be able to proceed until the current
* thread relinquishes the lock on this object. The awakened threads
* will compete in the usual manner with any other threads that might
* be actively competing to synchronize on this object; for example,
* the awakened threads enjoy no reliable privilege or disadvantage in
* being the next thread to lock this object.
* <p>
* This method should only be called by a thread that is the owner
* of this object's monitor. See the {@code notify} method for a
* description of the ways in which a thread can become the owner of
* a monitor.
*
* @throws IllegalMonitorStateException if the current thread is not
* the owner of this object's monitor.
* @see java.lang.Object#notify()
* @see java.lang.Object#wait()
*/
/*唤醒在此对象监视器上等待的所有线程。*/
public final native void notifyAll();
/**
* Causes the current thread to wait until either another thread invokes the
* {@link java.lang.Object#notify()} method or the
* {@link java.lang.Object#notifyAll()} method for this object, or a
* specified amount of time has elapsed.
* <p>
* The current thread must own this object's monitor.
* <p>
* This method causes the current thread (call it <var>T</var>) to
* place itself in the wait set for this object and then to relinquish
* any and all synchronization claims on this object. Thread <var>T</var>
* becomes disabled for thread scheduling purposes and lies dormant
* until one of four things happens:
* <ul>
* <li>Some other thread invokes the {@code notify} method for this
* object and thread <var>T</var> happens to be arbitrarily chosen as
* the thread to be awakened.
* <li>Some other thread invokes the {@code notifyAll} method for this
* object.
* <li>Some other thread {@linkplain Thread#interrupt() interrupts}
* thread <var>T</var>.
* <li>The specified amount of real time has elapsed, more or less. If
* {@code timeout} is zero, however, then real time is not taken into
* consideration and the thread simply waits until notified.
* </ul>
* The thread <var>T</var> is then removed from the wait set for this
* object and re-enabled for thread scheduling. It then competes in the
* usual manner with other threads for the right to synchronize on the
* object; once it has gained control of the object, all its
* synchronization claims on the object are restored to the status quo
* ante - that is, to the situation as of the time that the {@code wait}
* method was invoked. Thread <var>T</var> then returns from the
* invocation of the {@code wait} method. Thus, on return from the
* {@code wait} method, the synchronization state of the object and of
* thread {@code T} is exactly as it was when the {@code wait} method
* was invoked.
* <p>
* A thread can also wake up without being notified, interrupted, or
* timing out, a so-called <i>spurious wakeup</i>. While this will rarely
* occur in practice, applications must guard against it by testing for
* the condition that should have caused the thread to be awakened, and
* continuing to wait if the condition is not satisfied. In other words,
* waits should always occur in loops, like this one:
* <pre>
* synchronized (obj) {
* while (<condition does not hold>)
* obj.wait(timeout);
* ... // Perform action appropriate to condition
* }
* </pre>
* (For more information on this topic, see Section 3.2.3 in Doug Lea's
* "Concurrent Programming in Java (Second Edition)" (Addison-Wesley,
* 2000), or Item 50 in Joshua Bloch's "Effective Java Programming
* Language Guide" (Addison-Wesley, 2001).
*
* <p>If the current thread is {@linkplain java.lang.Thread#interrupt()
* interrupted} by any thread before or while it is waiting, then an
* {@code InterruptedException} is thrown. This exception is not
* thrown until the lock status of this object has been restored as
* described above.
*
* <p>
* Note that the {@code wait} method, as it places the current thread
* into the wait set for this object, unlocks only this object; any
* other objects on which the current thread may be synchronized remain
* locked while the thread waits.
* <p>
* This method should only be called by a thread that is the owner
* of this object's monitor. See the {@code notify} method for a
* description of the ways in which a thread can become the owner of
* a monitor.
*
* @param timeout the maximum time to wait in milliseconds.
* @throws IllegalArgumentException if the value of timeout is
* negative.
* @throws IllegalMonitorStateException if the current thread is not
* the owner of the object's monitor.
* @throws InterruptedException if any thread interrupted the
* current thread before or while the current thread
* was waiting for a notification. The <i>interrupted
* status</i> of the current thread is cleared when
* this exception is thrown.
* @see java.lang.Object#notify()
* @see java.lang.Object#notifyAll()
*/
/*
在其他线程调用此对象的 notify() 方法或 notifyAll() 方法，或者超过指定的时间量前，导致当前线程等待。
该方法使当前线程等待，直到另外一个线程调用该对象的notify或notifyAll方法，或者等待时间已到，当前线程才会从等待池移到运行池。
如果在wait之前或者wait的时候，当前线程被中断了，那么直到该线程被恢复的时候才会抛出中断异常（InterruptedException）
*/
public final native void wait(long timeout) throws InterruptedException;
/**
* Causes the current thread to wait until another thread invokes the
* {@link java.lang.Object#notify()} method or the
* {@link java.lang.Object#notifyAll()} method for this object, or
* some other thread interrupts the current thread, or a certain
* amount of real time has elapsed.
* <p>
* This method is similar to the {@code wait} method of one
* argument, but it allows finer control over the amount of time to
* wait for a notification before giving up. The amount of real time,
* measured in nanoseconds, is given by:
* <blockquote>
* <pre>
* 1000000*timeout+nanos</pre></blockquote>
* <p>
* In all other respects, this method does the same thing as the
* method {@link #wait(long)} of one argument. In particular,
* {@code wait(0, 0)} means the same thing as {@code wait(0)}.
* <p>
* The current thread must own this object's monitor. The thread
* releases ownership of this monitor and waits until either of the
* following two conditions has occurred:
* <ul>
* <li>Another thread notifies threads waiting on this object's monitor
* to wake up either through a call to the {@code notify} method
* or the {@code notifyAll} method.
* <li>The timeout period, specified by {@code timeout}
* milliseconds plus {@code nanos} nanoseconds arguments, has
* elapsed.
* </ul>
* <p>
* The thread then waits until it can re-obtain ownership of the
* monitor and resumes execution.
* <p>
* As in the one argument version, interrupts and spurious wakeups are
* possible, and this method should always be used in a loop:
* <pre>
* synchronized (obj) {
* while (<condition does not hold>)
* obj.wait(timeout, nanos);
* ... // Perform action appropriate to condition
* }
* </pre>
* This method should only be called by a thread that is the owner
* of this object's monitor. See the {@code notify} method for a
* description of the ways in which a thread can become the owner of
* a monitor.
*
* @param timeout the maximum time to wait in milliseconds.
* @param nanos additional time, in nanoseconds range
* 0-999999.
* @throws IllegalArgumentException if the value of timeout is
* negative or the value of nanos is
* not in the range 0-999999.
* @throws IllegalMonitorStateException if the current thread is not
* the owner of this object's monitor.
* @throws InterruptedException if any thread interrupted the
* current thread before or while the current thread
* was waiting for a notification. The <i>interrupted
* status</i> of the current thread is cleared when
* this exception is thrown.
*/
/* 在其他线程调用此对象的 notify() 方法或 notifyAll() 方法，或者其他某个线程中断当前线程，或者已超过某个实际时间量前，导致当前线程等待。*/
public final void wait(long timeout, int nanos) throws InterruptedException {
if (timeout < 0) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("timeout value is negative");
}
if (nanos < 0 || nanos > 999999) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(
"nanosecond timeout value out of range");
}
if (nanos > 0) {
timeout++;
}
wait(timeout);
}
/**
* Causes the current thread to wait until another thread invokes the
* {@link java.lang.Object#notify()} method or the
* {@link java.lang.Object#notifyAll()} method for this object.
* In other words, this method behaves exactly as if it simply
* performs the call {@code wait(0)}.
* <p>
* The current thread must own this object's monitor. The thread
* releases ownership of this monitor and waits until another thread
* notifies threads waiting on this object's monitor to wake up
* either through a call to the {@code notify} method or the
* {@code notifyAll} method. The thread then waits until it can
* re-obtain ownership of the monitor and resumes execution.
* <p>
* As in the one argument version, interrupts and spurious wakeups are
* possible, and this method should always be used in a loop:
* <pre>
* synchronized (obj) {
* while (<condition does not hold>)
* obj.wait();
* ... // Perform action appropriate to condition
* }
* </pre>
* This method should only be called by a thread that is the owner
* of this object's monitor. See the {@code notify} method for a
* description of the ways in which a thread can become the owner of
* a monitor.
*
* @throws IllegalMonitorStateException if the current thread is not
* the owner of the object's monitor.
* @throws InterruptedException if any thread interrupted the
* current thread before or while the current thread
* was waiting for a notification. The <i>interrupted
* status</i> of the current thread is cleared when
* this exception is thrown.
* @see java.lang.Object#notify()
* @see java.lang.Object#notifyAll()
*/
/*
在其他线程调用此对象的 notify() 方法或 notifyAll() 方法前，导致当前线程等待。换句话说，此方法的行为就好像它仅执行 wait(0) 调用一样。
当前线程必须拥有此对象监视器。该线程发布对此监视器的所有权并等待，直到其他线程通过调用 notify 方法，或 notifyAll 方法通知在此对象的监视器上等待的线程醒来。然后该线程将等到重新获得对监视器的所有权后才能继续执行。
*/
public final void wait() throws InterruptedException {
wait(0);
}
/**
* Called by the garbage collector on an object when garbage collection
* determines that there are no more references to the object.
* A subclass overrides the {@code finalize} method to dispose of
* system resources or to perform other cleanup.
* <p>
* The general contract of {@code finalize} is that it is invoked
* if and when the Java™ virtual
* machine has determined that there is no longer any
* means by which this object can be accessed by any thread that has
* not yet died, except as a result of an action taken by the
* finalization of some other object or class which is ready to be
* finalized. The {@code finalize} method may take any action, including
* making this object available again to other threads; the usual purpose
* of {@code finalize}, however, is to perform cleanup actions before
* the object is irrevocably discarded. For example, the finalize method
* for an object that represents an input/output connection might perform
* explicit I/O transactions to break the connection before the object is
* permanently discarded.
* <p>
* The {@code finalize} method of class {@code Object} performs no
* special action; it simply returns normally. Subclasses of
* {@code Object} may override this definition.
* <p>
* The Java programming language does not guarantee which thread will
* invoke the {@code finalize} method for any given object. It is
* guaranteed, however, that the thread that invokes finalize will not
* be holding any user-visible synchronization locks when finalize is
* invoked. If an uncaught exception is thrown by the finalize method,
* the exception is ignored and finalization of that object terminates.
* <p>
* After the {@code finalize} method has been invoked for an object, no
* further action is taken until the Java virtual machine has again
* determined that there is no longer any means by which this object can
* be accessed by any thread that has not yet died, including possible
* actions by other objects or classes which are ready to be finalized,
* at which point the object may be discarded.
* <p>
* The {@code finalize} method is never invoked more than once by a Java
* virtual machine for any given object.
* <p>
* Any exception thrown by the {@code finalize} method causes
* the finalization of this object to be halted, but is otherwise
* ignored.
*
* @throws Throwable the {@code Exception} raised by this method
* @see java.lang.ref.WeakReference
* @see java.lang.ref.PhantomReference
* @jls 12.6 Finalization of Class Instances
*/
/*
当垃圾回收器确定不存在对该对象的更多引用时，由对象的垃圾回收器调用此方法。
垃圾回收器在认为该对象是垃圾对象的时候会调用该方法。子类可以通过重写该方法来达到资源释放的目的。
在方法调用过程中出现的异常会被忽略且方法调用会被终止。
任何对象的该方法只会被调用一次
*/
protected void finalize() throws Throwable { }
}
238
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
