【Paper阅读】SB routing and scheduling 相关论文

背景

SB routing 需要考虑的三个问题
SB routing 必须解决的两个大boss

相关论文

1. 《Planning bus bridging evacuation during rail transit operation disruption. Journal of Urban Planning and Development》Hu, Gao, Yu, Liu, and Li (2016) presented a nonlinear integer programming model to
   plan the bus bridging service along a rail transit line during a disruption, solved it via a
   genetic algorithm, and applied it to the Shanghai metro system.
2. 《A feeder-bus dispatch planning model for mergency evacuation in urban rail transit corridors》Wang, Yan, Zhou, and Zhang (2016) proposed a feeder-bus dispatch planning model for the collaborative optimisation of urban rail transit (URT) and feeder-bus cooperation under emergency situations, to minimise the total evacuation cost of the feeder-buses, and applied to the Nanjing URT.
3. 《Plan-based flexible bus bridging operation strategy. 》Gu, Yu, Ji, Zheng, and Zhang (2018) formulated a two-stage model to allocate and schedule buses to predefined bridging routes during a metro disruption and minimised the bus bridging time and total passenger delay. The proposed model was incorporated in a rolling horizon framework to handle dynamic passenger arrivals and applied to two case studies in Shanghai.
4. 《Design of bus bridging routes in response to disruption of urban rail transit》Deng, Ru, Dou, and Liang (2018) designed bus bridging routes for passengers in case of rail transit disruption, conducted numerical studies on Tianjin, and found that direct bridging routes were preferred for short travel distances, while indirect bridging routes were preferred for longer travel distances.
5. 《Enhancing metro network resilience via localized integration with bus services》Jin, Tang, Sun, and Lee (2014) introduced localised integration between bus services and metro system and developed a two-stage stochastic programme for enhancing the resilience of metro networks and applied it to the Singapore metro system.
6. 【图书馆找不到，google要花钱】《A straightforward method for shuttle-bus line design under urban rail transit emergencies》Wang, Yuan, and Yin (2019) investigated the feeder bus evacuation mechanism in response to the URT service disruption and the evolution of passenger flow after disruption and developed a method to solve the shuttle-bus line design problem.
7. 《Robust bus bridging service design under rail transit system disruptions》Liang et al. (2019) proposed a path-based multi-commodity flow model for designing bus bridging service and incorporated the consideration of bus travel time uncertainty.
8. 《Managing unplanned rail disruptions: Policy implications and guidelines towards an effective bus bridging strategy》Itani, Aboudina, Diab, Srikukenthiran, and Shalaby (2019) provided a robust analysis of four factors affecting bus bridging policies: (1) initial dispatch direction of shuttle buses, (2) dispatch time (i.e. the response time for equesting shuttle buses), (3) uncertainty in predicting the incident duration, and (4) reduction of metro passengers
   TRANSPORT REVIEWS 241demand because of disruption. The model was validated and applied to disruption scenarios in Toronto.
9. Moreover, locating the SB depots is ineluctable. Pender, Currie, Delbosc, and Shiwakoti (2014b) described a method for assessing satellite bus reserve locations by optimising the locations in relation to the time, disruption likelihood and commuters
   affected, and applied it to the metropolitan rail service in Melbourne.
10. 【优先级弱】Jin, Teo, and Odoni (2015) introduced a game-theoretic approach for enhancing the robustness of urban transit networks to intentional disruptions via optimally allocating protection resources
11. 【优先级弱】Nikolić and Teodorović (2015) proposed a mathematical formulation based on the VRP with Time Windows (VRPTW) to modify the vehicle routes to cater for unexpectedly high demand at some nodes, and proposed a heuristic approach to solve the problem via a Bee Colony Optimization (BCO) metaheuristic.
12. Most recently, Tan, Xu, Meng, and Li (2020) linked the evacuation bus service design and the heterogeneous risk-taking behavior of the affected metro passengers, and conducted a numerical experiment based on a real-world network in Wuhan, China.
13. Nikolić and Teodorović (2019) proposed a BCO metaheuristic to reassign available buses and to change the network topology (if necessary) to address disturbances in public transit. The focus was on minimising the number of rejected (unserved) passengers, the total overcrowding on all routes, the total number of changed (shortened) bus routes, and the total travel time of all transported passengers. The proposed heuristic algorithm was demonstrated on the network of Rivera in Uruguay
14. Yang, Jin, Wu, and Jiang (2017) addressed the issue of congestion and developed a compound strategy to integrate passenger flow control and bus-bridging service for a metro line in Shanghai. Specifically, they proposed a two-stage modelling procedure, in which stage 1 determined the stations and time periods for exercising the passenger flow control strategy and stage 2 identified the optimal bus-bridging services.
15. Zhang, Saadat, Zhang, Ayyub, and Huang (2018) proposed a link-weighted network model considering the physical interval lengths between neighbouring metro stations as weights and applied the model to the Shanghai metro network under different failure scenarios.