public static void compare() throws Exception{
long start1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < 5000; i++) {
Iterator readers = ImageIO.getImageReadersByFormatName("png");
ImageReader reader = (ImageReader) readers.next();
File file = new File("d://1.png");
ImageInputStream input = ImageIO.createImageInputStream(file);
reader.setInput(input, true);
int width = reader.getWidth(0);
int height = reader.getHeight(0);
//System.out.println(width + "/" + height);
}
long end1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println(end1 - start1);
long start2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < 5000; i++) {
File file = new File("d://1.png");
BufferedImage bi = ImageIO.read(file);
int width = bi.getWidth();
int height = bi.getHeight();
//System.out.println(width + "/" + height);
}
long end2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println(end2 - start2);
}
运行结果
390
3192
可见第一中获取图片信息效率明显高于第二种。
看了下源码第一种方法只适用于简单的操作。
而第二种适用的范围比较广,在ImageIO源码中也适用了ImageReader。