Leetcode 217. Contains Duplicate

54 篇文章 0 订阅

Got a TLE using HashMap, it's supposed to be o(n)

public class Solution {
    public boolean containsDuplicate(int[] nums) {
        HashMap<Integer, Integer> map = new HashMap<Integer, Integer>();
        for (int num : nums) {
            if (map.get(num) != null) return true;
            map.put(num, 0);
        }
        return false;
    }
}


HashSet approach, no TLE

/**
 * HashSet, HashMap, and HashTable
 * both HashMap and HashTable implement the Map interface
 * HashMap is non-synschronized but HashTable is synchronized thus can be used for multi-thread applications 
 * both of them allow duplicate keys
 * HashSet, however, doesn't allow duplicate keys
 * it has a add() function rather than put() function
 */ 
public class Solution {
    public boolean containsDuplicate(int[] nums) {
        HashSet<Integer> set = new HashSet<Integer>();
        for (int num : nums) {
            if(set.contains(num)) return true;
            set.add(num);
        }
        return false;
    }
}


Another approach, sort the array first, compare nums[i] and nums[i-1], if they are equal, then return true else return false

time complexity o(nlogn) b/c of the sort operation. BUT still faster than HashSet approach

public class Solution {
    public boolean containsDuplicate(int[] nums) {
        Arrays.sort(nums);
        for (int i=1; i<nums.length; i++)
            if (nums[i] == nums[i-1]) return true;
        return false;
    }
}

Conclusion, hash operations suck



  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论

“相关推荐”对你有帮助么?

  • 非常没帮助
  • 没帮助
  • 一般
  • 有帮助
  • 非常有帮助
提交
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值