麦克斯韦方程场分量之间关系公式推导

前段时间遇到了一个问题,电场和磁场可以被表示为:
E ⃗ = ( e ⃗ t + e z z ^ ) exp ⁡ ( i β z ) H ⃗ = ( h ⃗ t + h z z ^ ) exp ⁡ ( i β z ) \begin{align} \vec{\mathrm{E}} &= \left ( \vec{\mathrm{e}}_t + e_z\hat{z} \right )\exp{\left ( i\beta z \right ) } \\ \vec{\mathrm{H}} &= \left ( \vec{\mathrm{h}}_t + h_z\hat{z} \right )\exp{\left ( i\beta z \right ) } \end{align} E H =(e t+ezz^)exp(iβz)=(h t+hzz^)exp(iβz)
显然, e ⃗ t \vec{\mathrm{e}}_t e txy的函数,进一步我们可得:
∇ t × A ⃗ t = z ^ ( ∂ A y ∂ x − ∂ A x ∂ y ) \begin{align} \nabla_t \times \vec{\mathrm{A}}_t = \hat{z}\left ( \frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y} \right ) \end{align} t×A t=z^(xAyyAx)
现在我们有四个场分量表达式:
e ⃗ t = − ( μ 0 ϵ 0 ) 1 / 2 1 k n 2 z ^ × ( β h ⃗ t + i ∇ t h z ) h ⃗ t = ( ϵ 0 μ 0 ) 1 / 2 1 k z ^ × ( β e ⃗ t + i ∇ t e z ) e z = i ( μ 0 ϵ 0 ) 1 / 2 1 k n 2 z ^ ⋅ ∇ t × h ⃗ t = i β [ ∇ t ⋅ e ⃗ t + ( e ⃗ t ⋅ ∇ t ) ln ⁡ n 2 ] h z = − i ( ϵ 0 μ 0 ) 1 / 2 1 k z ^ ⋅ ∇ t × e ⃗ t = i β ∇ t ⋅ h ⃗ t \begin{align} \vec{\mathrm{e}}_t &= -\left ( \frac{\mu_0}{\epsilon_0} \right )^{1/2}\frac{1}{kn^2}\hat{z}\times \left ( \beta \vec{\mathrm{h}}_t + i\nabla_th_z \right ) \\ \vec{\mathrm{h}}_t &= \left ( \frac{\epsilon_0}{\mu_0} \right )^{1/2}\frac{1}{k} \hat{z}\times \left ( \beta\vec{\mathrm{e}}_t + i\nabla_te_z \right ) \\ e_z &= i\left ( \frac{\mu_0}{\epsilon_0} \right ) ^{1/2}\frac{1}{kn^2}\hat{z}\cdot\nabla_t\times\vec{\mathrm{h}}_t = \frac{i}{\beta}\left [ \nabla_t\cdot \vec{\mathrm{e}}_t + \left ( \vec{\mathrm{e}}_t \cdot \nabla_t \right )\ln{n^2} \right ] \\ h_z &= -i\left ( \frac{\epsilon_0}{\mu_0} \right ) ^{1/2}\frac{1}{k}\hat{z}\cdot\nabla_t\times\vec{\mathrm{e}}_t = \frac{i}{\beta}\nabla_t \cdot \vec{\mathrm{h}}_t \end{align} e th tezhz=(ϵ0μ0)1/2kn21z^×(βh t+ithz)=(μ0ϵ0)1/2k1z^×(βe t+itez)=i(ϵ0μ0)1/2kn21z^t×h t=βi[te t+(e tt)lnn2]=i(μ0ϵ0)1/2k1z^t×e t=βith t
场分量表达式中的第一个等号的推导显而易见,这里我们着重集中于 e z e_z ez h z h_z hz分量中的第二个等号的推导。

e z e_z ez推导

我们将(5)式代入(7)式中:
i β ∇ t ⋅ h ⃗ t = i β ( ϵ 0 μ 0 ) 1 / 2 1 k ∇ t ⋅ z ^ × ( β e ⃗ t + i ∇ t e z ) = − i ( ϵ 0 μ 0 ) 1 / 2 1 k ∇ t ⋅ z ^ × ( β e ⃗ t + i β ∇ t e z ) = − i ( ϵ 0 μ 0 ) 1 / 2 1 k ( ∇ t ⋅ − z ^ × e ⃗ t − ∇ t ⋅ z ^ × i β ∇ t e z ) = − i ( ϵ 0 μ 0 ) 1 / 2 1 k ( ∇ t ⋅ e ⃗ t × z ^ − ∇ t ⋅ z ^ × i β ∇ t e z ) = − i ( ϵ 0 μ 0 ) 1 / 2 1 k ( ∂ e y ∂ x − ∂ e x ∂ y ) \begin{align} \frac{i}{\beta}\nabla_t \cdot \vec{\mathrm{h}}_t &= \frac{i}{\beta}\left ( \frac{\epsilon_0}{\mu_0} \right )^{1/2}\frac{1}{k} \nabla_t \cdot\hat{z}\times \left ( \beta\vec{\mathrm{e}}_t + i\nabla_te_z \right ) \nonumber \\ &= -i\left ( \frac{\epsilon_0}{\mu_0} \right )^{1/2}\frac{1}{k} \nabla_t \cdot \hat{z}\times \left ( \beta\vec{\mathrm{e}}_t + \frac{i}{\beta}\nabla_te_z \right ) \nonumber \\ &= -i\left ( \frac{\epsilon_0}{\mu_0} \right )^{1/2}\frac{1}{k} \left ( \nabla_t \cdot-\hat{z}\times \vec{\mathrm{e}}_t - \nabla_t \cdot\hat{z}\times\frac{i}{\beta}\nabla_te_z \right ) \nonumber \\ &= -i\left ( \frac{\epsilon_0}{\mu_0} \right )^{1/2}\frac{1}{k} \left ( \nabla_t \cdot \vec{\mathrm{e}}_t\times \hat{z} - \nabla_t \cdot\hat{z}\times\frac{i}{\beta}\nabla_te_z \right ) \nonumber \\ &= -i\left ( \frac{\epsilon_0}{\mu_0} \right )^{1/2}\frac{1}{k} \left ( \frac{\partial e_y}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial e_x}{\partial y} \right ) \end{align} βith t=βi(μ0ϵ0)1/2k1tz^×(βe t+itez)=i(μ0ϵ0)1/2k1tz^×(βe t+βitez)=i(μ0ϵ0)1/2k1(tz^×e ttz^×βitez)=i(μ0ϵ0)1/2k1(te t×z^tz^×βitez)=i(μ0ϵ0)1/2k1(xeyyex)
我们再计算等号左侧部分:
− i ( ϵ 0 μ 0 ) 1 / 2 1 k z ^ ⋅ ∇ t × e ⃗ t = − i ( ϵ 0 μ 0 ) 1 / 2 1 k z ^ ⋅ z ^ ( ∂ e y ∂ x − ∂ e x ∂ y ) = − i ( ϵ 0 μ 0 ) 1 / 2 1 k ( ∂ e y ∂ x − ∂ e x ∂ y ) \begin{align} -i\left ( \frac{\epsilon_0}{\mu_0} \right ) ^{1/2}\frac{1}{k}\hat{z}\cdot\nabla_t\times\vec{\mathrm{e}}_t &= -i\left ( \frac{\epsilon_0}{\mu_0} \right ) ^{1/2}\frac{1}{k}\hat{z} \cdot \hat{z}\left ( \frac{\partial e_y}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial e_x}{\partial y} \right ) \nonumber \\ &= -i\left ( \frac{\epsilon_0}{\mu_0} \right ) ^{1/2}\frac{1}{k}\left(\frac{\partial e_y}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial e_x}{\partial y}\right) \end{align} i(μ0ϵ0)1/2k1z^t×e t=i(μ0ϵ0)1/2k1z^z^(xeyyex)=i(μ0ϵ0)1/2k1(xeyyex)
可以看到,(8)式与(9)式完全一致,至此我们证明了第二个等号的正确性。

h z h_z hz推导

暂时未能成功推出, ln ⁡ n 2 \ln n^2 lnn2项很诡异。

如果大家觉得有用,就点个赞让更多的人看到吧~

  • 1
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 打赏
    打赏
  • 0
    评论
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包

打赏作者

勤奋的大熊猫

你的鼓励将是我写作最大的动力

¥1 ¥2 ¥4 ¥6 ¥10 ¥20
扫码支付:¥1
获取中
扫码支付

您的余额不足,请更换扫码支付或充值

打赏作者

实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值