new BigDecmal (double)精度问题及与BigDecimal.valueOf(double)的区别

工作时，有人用new BigDecmal (double)的方式计算精确数值，发现会有精度缺失的问题，改用BigDecimal.valueOf(double)的方式便好了，于是看了下两个源码。

 

1、new BigDecmal (double)源码

在传入double的时候，没有经过先转为string再进行转换，会有精度缺失的问题，源码的注释上也注明了这一点，追求精度的用valueOf方法或是可先将double 转为String然后用new BigDecmal (string)

/**
     * Translates a {@code double} into a {@code BigDecimal} which
     * is the exact decimal representation of the {@code double}'s
     * binary floating-point value.  The scale of the returned
     * {@code BigDecimal} is the smallest value such that
     * <tt>(10<sup>scale</sup> &times; val)</tt> is an integer.
     * <p>
     * <b>Notes:</b>
     * <ol>
     * <li>
     * The results of this constructor can be somewhat unpredictable.
     * One might assume that writing {@code new BigDecimal(0.1)} in
     * Java creates a {&#