加密所有事物，将数据安全存储在任何地方

Storing your data is easy. Protecting it is hard. Our personal information, photos, documents, banking information, and more is being stored by third-parties and we are giving up control for convenience.

存储数据很容易。 保护它很困难。 我们的个人信息，照片，文档，银行信息等将由第三方存储，为了方便起见，我们将放弃控制。

We all have a choice of which provider we want to use to store our information: Dropbox, Google Drive, OneDrive, iCloud, Box, etc. We can access our data anywhere, anytime, and its awesome. They have great apps, and you can selectively sync on your desktop or phone, not having to worry about storage space.

我们都可以选择使用哪个提供商来存储我们的信息：Dropbox，Google Drive，OneDrive，iCloud，Box等。我们可以随时随地访问我们的数据，而且数据真棒。 它们具有出色的应用程序，您可以有选择地在台式机或手机上进行同步，而不必担心存储空间。

That’s all good but I want to store my data and sleep sound that nobody can access it, service provider, government, hacker, that crazy ex we all have who is totally trying to guess my password right now. This seems daunting but there have been some amazing developers who have created some open source tools to be able to manage this and not have to pay enterprise prices, for enterprise encryption.

很好，但是我想存储我的数据和睡眠声音，任何人都无法访问它，服务提供商，政府，黑客，这疯狂的前我们所有人现在都在完全猜测我的密码。 这似乎令人生畏，但是有一些了不起的开发人员创建了一些开源工具来管理此事务，而不必为企业加密支付企业价格。

此列表的目标： (Goals for this list:)

1. Tools to be open source.
   开源工具。
2. Rate the ease of use of each.
   评估每种工具的易用性。
3. Define the encryption standards.
   定义加密标准。
4. Explain the pros and cons of each.
   解释每种方法的优缺点。

1.密码器 (1. Cryptomator)

->易于使用：4.5 / 5 (-> Ease of use: 4.5/5)

Top of the list (easily) Cryptomator is one of the most straightforward, tried and tested, tools out there. Build to work with cloud, as well as local, encryption, they also have iOS, Android, MacOS, Windows, and Linux applications that are easy to use. They also have some great ties with other tools (Not open source but worth a look).

列表顶部(轻松) Cryptomator是其中最简单，经过尝试和测试的工具之一。 可以与云以及本地加密一起使用，它们还具有易于使用的iOS，Android，MacOS，Windows和Linux应用程序。 它们与其他工具也有很多联系(不是开源的，但值得一看)。

So clean and easy

如此干净方便

Cryptomator encrypts file contents and names using AES256 encryption (AKA the global standard). Your passphrase is protected against brute forcing attempts using scrypt. Directory structures get obfuscated as well as filenames.

Cryptomator使用AES 256加密(也称为全球标准)对文件内容和名称进行加密。 使用scrypt可以保护密码短语免遭强行尝试。 目录结构以及文件名变得模糊。

It’s is a free and open source software licensed under the GPLv3. This allows anyone to check the code and audit it. This means: no backdoor and constant scrutiny. It’s a zero trust system as the code is free to view/fork/clone right here! Their Docs are nicely written and they even provide a sanitizer tool encase your vault gets corrupted.

它是GPLv3许可的免费开源软件。 这样，任何人都可以检查代码并对其进行审核。 这意味着：没有后门和持续的审查。 这是一个零信任系统，因为代码可以在此处自由查看/分叉/克隆 ！ 他们的文档写得很好， 他们甚至提供了一个清理工具，以防止您的金库损坏。

It can also be combined with Mountain Duck (Paid tool 39 USD — Yikes I know), you can create a seamless desktop experience with selective sync as well as some other neat features.

它也可以与Mountain Duck (付费工具39美元—我知道，Yikes)结合使用，可以创建无缝的桌面体验，并具有选择性同步以及其他一些巧妙功能。

Pros:

优点：

• Good encryption and brute force protection
  良好的加密和蛮力保护
• Easy to use with nearly any cloud provider (build in integrations with several)
  几乎可以与几乎所有云提供商一起使用(与多个提供商集成)
• Cross-platform (iOS, Android, Linux, Windows, Mac)
  跨平台(iOS，Android，Linux，Windows，Mac)
• Very well recognized and active development
  非常认可和积极的发展
• Encrypts file-by-file, not within a container (compare this with VeraCrypt)
  逐个文件而不是在容器内加密(与VeraCrypt进行比较)

Cons:

缺点：

• Slow transfer speeds (Max ~ 15–150MiB/s depending on platform (Windows is best, Linux/Mac the worst))
  传输速度较慢(取决于平台，最大约为15–150MiB / s(Windows最佳，Linux / Mac最差))

• Mobile Apps not open source<