反作弊策略
You’ve been wandering around the same three rooms in a dungeon for the past 30 minutes. You go back to your inventory for the dozenth time to check again on what supplies you have at your disposal. Believe it or not, equipping the hook shot for the seventh time this hour does not make it the solution to the problem of getting the key which will open the chest in the next room over. What am I missing? And now I only have a little time left before I have to go to bed to get up early for work tomorrow. You know what? I’ve had it! I give up! I’m going to do what some gamers think is the unthinkable! I’m going to find the solution to my dungeon despair with an online strategy guide! You heard me right!
Ÿou've一直转悠同三个房间的地牢，在过去30分钟。 您将十二次返回库存，以再次检查可用的耗材。 信不信由你，此刻第七次装备钩子射击并不能解决拿到钥匙的问题，该钥匙将打开下一个房间的箱子。 我想念什么？ 现在，我只剩下一点时间了，明天我必须上床睡觉才能早起。 你知道吗？ 我吃过了！ 我放弃！ 我将做一些游戏玩家认为不可思议的事情！ 我将通过在线策略指南找到解决我的地牢绝望的解决方案！ 你没听错我的话！
We’ve all gotten stuck on a certain puzzle in an adventure, or have needed some tips on beating that nightmarish boss that stands in the way of the next area. But my question is whether the answer of whether or not to submit to these persuasions to look for the remedy online or in a physical strategy guide says something about the gaming ethics of the player making this decision. Does finding out what to do next mean you just aren’t good at the game? Or perhaps you don’t enjoy the incredibly rewarding process of tinkering with the sandbox around you until you have found the epiphany? Is it even that serious? It depends on who you ask.
我们都陷入了冒险中的某个难题，或者需要一些技巧来打败那个阻碍下一个区域的噩梦般的老板。 但是我的问题是，是否服从这些说服以在线或在物理策略指南中寻找补救措施的答案是否说明了做出此决定的玩家的游戏道德。 找出下一步该做什么，是否意味着您不擅长游戏？ 或者，也许您不喜欢在发现顿悟之前对周围的沙盒进行修补的令人难以置信的奖励过程？ 真的那么严重吗？ 这取决于你问谁。
When I was little, my dad always bought our family the Prima strategy guides for all of my classic favorites. The high quality, color-filled pages of the booklets had detailed maps and descriptions of where to go and what to do. It made you feel like the guide was part of the gaming experience, not just a cheat sheet to find out the next answer. Almost like a teacher who gives their students the tools to figure out the solution on their exam without just relinquishing information and ridding their hands of the dilemma. Even still, reading one of these guides was not supposed to be a one time event; the publishers expected the gamer to follow along with the strategies listed for the entire duration of the play though. Trying to find just one tidbit of help was often a trek that just added more tedium to the gaming journey, at least that’s how underage me felt many times throughout childhood. All in all, you would be hard pressed to find a gamer born before the 2010s who hasn’t looked into the beautiful abyss of one of these magazines. They made you feel like you weren’t cheating yourself and you were still getting everything rewarding out of your game. But I liked the more “unethical” methods of help from the time I could use the internet. Enter gamefaqs.com
当我小的时候，我的父亲总是为我的所有经典收藏品购买我们的Prima策略指南。 手册的高质量，彩色填充页上有详细的地图以及去哪里和做什么的描述。 它使您感到该指南是游戏体验的一部分，而不仅仅是寻找下一个答案的备忘单。 几乎就像老师一样，老师为学生提供了工具，可以在不放弃信息并摆脱困境的情况下，为他们的考试找出解决方案。 即便如此，阅读这些指南之一也不应该是一次性的活动。 发行商希望玩家在整个游戏过程中都遵循列出的策略。 试图找到一个小窍门通常是一次艰苦的旅程，这只会给游戏带来更多的乏味，至少那是我整个童年时期对未成年人的感觉。 总而言之，您将很难找到一位在2010年代之前出生的，没有研究其中一本杂志美丽深渊的玩家。 他们让你觉得自己没有在欺骗自己，而你仍然从游戏中获得回报。 但是从我可以使用互联网开始，我就喜欢更“不道德”的帮助方法。 输入gamefaqs.com
GameFAQS entered the internet superhighway in 1995 and quickly turned into the ultimate online library for walkthroughs and cheats of all kinds. This site made you feel like the kid who got the answer key in the classroom before test day. There were a variety of guides for almost every game on every platform, turning the process of finding the answer to a question into a very quick trip to the computer. If I can’t find the solution on one user’s guide, just go to the next one, and then to the next one after that. The site sometimes felt quite cold compared to the lively efforts of a Prima, creating a mixed sensation in the gamer. I feel both naughty and rewarded when I go to GameFAQS. But why should any of these emotions be conjured when both avenues lead to the same end point? I’m stuck in my video game and I’m tired of it. I want answers. I get them with either guide. End of story. It therefore demonstrates how vague the gamer ethics spectrum can be that these two roads muster different feelings, and also how you’ll probably get a different answer depending on the person you pose these matters to.
GameFAQS于1995年进入互联网高速公路，并Swift成为各种演练和作弊的终极在线图书馆。 这个站点让您感觉像是在考试日之前在教室里获得答案键的孩子。 每个平台上几乎每个游戏都有各种指南，将找到问题答案的过程变成了快速访问计算机的过程。 如果我在一个用户指南上找不到解决方案，请转到下一个，然后再转到下一个。 与Prima的活泼努力相比，该网站有时感觉很冷，在游戏玩家中产生了不同的感觉。 当我去GameFAQS时，我既调皮又感到高兴。 但是，当两种途径都指向同一终点时，为什么要想到这些情绪中的任何一种呢？ 我一直沉迷于视频游戏，对此感到厌倦。 我想要答案。 我得到他们与任何指南。 故事结局。 因此，它证明了玩家的道德范围在两条道路上汇聚不同的感觉有多模糊，以及如何根据摆在您面前的这些人而获得不同的答案。
My brother is as anti-strategy guide and internet help as you can get. He could run around attempting to figure out the same objective in a game for two days without knowing what to do and still be unconvinced that it’s time to take a peek into the answer sheet. My dad is the opposite. Difficult bosses, hidden items, and more are all up for viewership grabs on Youtube and he has no shame in taking advantage of these modern walkthroughs. What motivates them to make these decisions on help or no help, though? Probably what makes every gamer play to begin with: enjoyment. Whatever aids in making the gaming experience as fun as possible is what should guide someone to go looking in a strategy manual or walkthrough, or to make the choice to soldier through for hours on end until the solution finally appears without that help. My brother tells me that there is no point in gaming if you are just going to go looking for someone or something else to solve the puzzle or quest for you in times of difficulty, but that is just the manifestation of his personal enjoyment of gaming. There is no moral code to playing a video game, and nobody is hurt by “cheating” and finding the answer online. It is just simply a matter doing whatever makes you happy.
我的兄弟是您获得的反战略指南和互联网帮助。 他可能会花两天时间试图在游戏中找出相同的目标，却不知道该怎么做，仍然不敢相信现在该看看答案表了。 我父亲是相反的。 困难的老板，隐藏的物品以及更多东西全都可以吸引到YouTube上的收视者争夺中，而他利用这些现代演练并不会感到羞耻。 但是，是什么促使他们做出这些决定的呢？ 可能是每个玩家玩游戏的始于：享受。 有助于使游戏体验尽可能有趣的是，可以引导某人继续阅读策略手册或演练，或者选择连续几个小时进行选择，直到解决方案最终在没有帮助的情况下出现。 我的兄弟告诉我，如果您只是想去寻找某个人或其他东西来解决困难时的难题或寻求游戏，那么游戏就没有任何意义，但这只是他个人享受游戏的乐趣的体现。 玩电子游戏没有道德准则，“作弊”和在线寻找答案都不会伤害任何人。 做让您快乐的事情仅仅是一件事情。
At the same time, there are certainly other instances of video game help tools becoming too soft on the person playing. Guides, cheats, and walkthroughs are one in the same essentially, and the player still has to execute whatever directions they have just been given, but Nintendo has added a feature to their Switch Online library that is nearly impossible to use without abusing it: an infinite rewind feature. By simply pressing the shoulder buttons simultaneously, the player can rewind to any part of their current play through, going back several minutes on any of the classic titles. It really does put the “strategy guides are cheating” argument to shame because, unlike with using a guide, you don’t even have to execute anything precisely when using the rewind feature. It’s playing a game where death is a moot point. It is obviously Nintendo’s way of letting younger players who are inexperienced in the ways of playing difficult retro games to get engaged in the experience without getting too discouraged. At the same time, it is all too tempting for a veteran like me to just rewind to my convenience, not wanting to make the trek back to a boss room in The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past. Much like a guide, it is an optional choice that every gamer has the ability to use or ignore, but the rewind feature speaks to our innate human instincts to take short cuts and be lazy much more than any walkthrough ever could. It’s so much more tempting to abuse because it’s at our fingertips. Guides take effort to use, rewind features don’t.
同时，当然还有其他一些视频游戏帮助工具对玩游戏的人来说太软了。 指南，作弊和演练本质上是相同的，并且玩家仍然必须执行刚刚给出的任何指示，但是Nintendo为其Switch Online库增加了一项功能，如果不滥用它，几乎是无法使用的：无限倒带功能。 通过简单地同时按下肩部按钮，播放器可以倒退到当前播放的任何部分，回滚几分钟即可播放任何经典游戏。 确实确实使“战略指南在作弊”这一说法感到羞耻，因为与使用指南不同，使用倒带功能时甚至不必精确地执行任何操作。 它正在玩以死亡为主题的游戏。 显然，任天堂的方法是让没有经验的年轻玩家在玩困难的复古游戏时参与其中，而又不会感到灰心。 同时，对于像我这样的资深人士来说，倒退到我的便利上实在是太诱人了，不想让跋涉回到《塞尔达传说：通向过去》的老板室。 就像指南一样，每个玩家都有使用或忽略的能力，这是一个可选的选择，但是倒带功能表明了我们天生的人类本能，可以捷径和懒惰，这比任何演练都多。 轻而易举地滥用它，因为它触手可及。 指南需要努力使用，倒带功能则不需要。
In the end though, I shouldn’t judge a rewind tool. Their purpose is just the same as a strategy guide’s. They are both there to help (or hinder) the enjoyment of a gamer’s play time, depending on the opinion of the gamer in question.
最后，我不应该判断倒带工具。 他们的目的与战略指南的目的相同。 它们都可以帮助(或阻碍)游戏者玩游戏的时间的长短，这取决于所讨论游戏者的意见。
What do you think? What are your favorite memories of using a walkthrough or help tool while gaming? Is it cheating or not?
你怎么看？ 您在游戏时使用演练或帮助工具最喜欢的记忆是什么？ 是作弊吗？
翻译自: https://medium.com/super-jump/strategy-guide-ethics-am-i-cheating-or-not-fae9ea6d8ec1
反作弊策略
1233
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
