由于这三个聚合来自具有相同WHERE条件的同一个表,因此您不需要子选择。所有三个聚合都在相同的行分组上运行(未指定GROUP BY,因此整个表格为一行),因此它们都可以直接存在于SELECT列表中。
SELECT
SUM(number) AS number_sum,
MAX(number) AS number_max,
MIN(number) AS number_min
FROM `table`如果任何聚合需要基于不同的条件,您将在WHERE子句中进行过滤,那么您将需要使用子选择来表示不同的条件,或者进行笛卡尔连接。对于仅返回一行的聚合,此子选择和以下LEFT JOIN方法应该是等效的,性能方面:
SELECT
/* Unique filtering condition - must be done in a subselect */
(SELECT SUM(number) FROM `table` WHERE `somecolumn` = `somevalue`) AS number_sum,
MAX(number) AS number_max,
MIN(number) AS number_min
FROM `table`或者等效于上面的查询,您可以对没有ON子句的子查询LEFT JOIN。只有当您知道子查询只返回一行时才应该这样做。否则,您将得到一个笛卡尔积 - 由连接的一侧返回的行数乘以另一侧返回的行数。
如果您需要使用一组WHERE子句条件和一些具有不同WHERE条件的列返回几列,但JOIN的每一侧只有一行,则这很方便。在这种情况下,JOIN应该比使用相同的WHERE子句执行两个子选择更快。
这应该更快......
SELECT
/* this one has two aggregates sharing a WHERE condition */
subq.number_sum_filtered,
subq.number_max_filtered,
/* ...and two aggregates on the main table with no WHERE clause filtering */
MAX(`table`.number) AS number_max,
MIN(`table`.number) AS number_min
FROM
`table`
LEFT JOIN (
SELECT
SUM(number) AS number_sum_filtered,
MAX(number) AS number_max_filtered
FROM `table`
WHERE `somecolumn = `somevalue`
) subq /* No ON clause here since there's no common column to join on... */比这个...
SELECT
/* Two different subselects each over the same filtered set */
(SELECT SUM(number) FROM `table` WHERE `somecolumn` = `somevalue`) AS number_sum_filtered,
(SELECT MAX(number) FROM `table` WHERE `somecolumn` = `somevalue`) AS number_max_filtered,
MAX(`table`.number) AS number_max,
MIN(`table`.number) AS number_min
FROM
`table`