数据包络java_外文翻译—模糊数据包络分析(DEA)模型和排序方法

本文介绍了基于可信度测度的模糊数据包络分析(DEA)模型和排序方法。DEA是一种评估决策单元相对效率的有效方法。由于生产过程中的数据在某些情况下无法精确测量,因此模糊理论在DEA中发挥了重要作用。文章提出了一种扩展的传统DEA模型,并设计了结合模糊模拟和遗传算法的混合算法来解决模糊模型。最后,通过数值例子说明了模糊DEA模型和所有DMU的排序方法。
摘要由CSDN通过智能技术生成

内容介绍

原文档由会员 μˮͤ� 发布

Fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA)Model and ranking method

Meilin Wen ,Huaishu Li b

a Department of System Engineering of Engineering Technology, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing, 100083, China b Department of Computer Technology and Science, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China

Abstract

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a very effective method to eva luate the relative efficiency of decision-making units (DMUs). Since the data of production processes cannot be precisely measured in some cases, the uncertain theory has played an important role in DEA. This paper attempts to extend the traditional DEA models to a fuzzy framework, thus producing a fuzzy DEA model based on credibility measure. Following is a method of ranking all the DMUs. In order to solve the fuzzy model, we have designed the hybrid algorithm combined with fuzzy simulation and genetic algorithm. When the inputs and outputs are all trapezoidal or triangular fuzzy variables, the model can be transformed to linear programming. Finally, a numerical example is presented to illustrate the fuzzy DEA model and the method of ranking all the DMUs.

Keywords:Data envelopment analysis,Efficiency,Credibility measure

Ranking method,Fuzzy programming

1. Introduction

Data envelopment analysis (DEA), which initially proposed by Charnes et al. [5], is a nonparametric method for eva luating the relative efficiency of decision -making units (DMUs) on the basis of multiple inputs and outputs. Since DEA was proposed in 1978, it has been got comprehensive attention both in theory and application. Now DEA becomes the important analysis tool and research way in management science, operational research, system engineering, decision analysis and so on. Based on the original DEA model [5], various theoretical extensions have been developed [3,4,25,28,8]. More DEA papers can refer to Seiford [26] in which 500 references are documented.

Often decision makers are interested in a complete ranking beyond the dichotomized classification. The researches on ranking have come up. By now many papers on ranking have been published over the last decade within the DEA context. The cross-efficiency ranking method was first developed by Sexton et al. [27]. By eva luating DMUs through both self and peer pressure, one can attain a more balanced view of the decision-making units. Andersen & Petersen [2] developed the super-efficiency approach, in which the efficient units can receive a score greater than one, through the unit's exclusion

from the column being scored in the linear program. However, each unit is eva luated by its own weights as opposed to the cross-efficiency concept in which all units are compared using the same sets of weights. In the benchmarking ranking method [29], a DMU is highly ranked if it is chosen as a useful target for many other DMUs. This is of substantial use when looking to benchmark industries. For a review of ranking methods see [1].

Most methods of ranking DMUs assume that all inputs and outputs data are exactly known. But in more general cases, the data for eva luation are often collected from investigation to decide the natural language such as good, medium and bad rather than a specific case. That is, the inputs and outputs are fuzzy. We can find several fuzzy approaches to the assessment of efficiency in the DEA literature. Cooper et al. [6,7] were the first, to the best of our knowledge, to study how to deal with imprecise data such as bounded data, ordinal data and ratio bounded data in DEA. Kao and Liu [11] develop a method to find the membership functions of the fuzzy efficiency scores when some observations are fuzzy numbers. Entani et al. [9] propose an interval efficiency obtained from the pessimistic and the optimistic viewpoints. Since Zadeh [32,33] initiated the possibility measure, many researchers have introduced it into DEA [10,12]. Although possibility measure has been widely used, it has no self-duality property. However, a self-dual measure is absolutely needed in both theory and practice. In order to define a self-dual measure, Liu and Liu [20] presented the concept of credibility measure in 2002. An axiomatic foundation of credibility theory was given by Liu [22] in 2004. In this paper, the credibility measure is employed to the fuzzy DEA models.

This paper is organized as follows: some basic concept and results on credibility measure will be introduced in Section 2; n Section 3, we will give some introduction about CCR model; Section 4 will give the fuzzy DEA model and the ranking method; In order to solve the fuzzy DEA model, a hybrid algorithm is designed in Section 5. Section 6 will predigest the fuzzy model when the inputs and outputs are all trapezoidal fuzzy variables. Finally, a numerical example will be given to illustrate the fuzzy DEA model and the method of ranking al..

评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值