Half Wavelength Dipole Antenna

Reference :

1. wikipedia

Dipole_antenna_resonant_frequency.webm

The dipole antenna is the simplest and most widely used class of antenna.It consists of two identical conductive elements such as metal wires or rods, which are usually bilaterally symmetrical.Each side of the feedline to the transmitter or receiver is connected to one of the conductors.

Dipoles are resonant antennas, meaning that the elements serve as resonators, with standing waves of radio current flowing back and forth between their ends. So the length of the dipole elements is determined by the wavelength of the radio waves used. The most common form is the half-wave dipole, in which each of the two rod elements is approximately 1/4 wavelength long, so the whole antenna is a half-wavelength long. The radiation pattern of a vertical dipole is omnidirectional; it radiates equal power in allazimuthal directions perpendicular to the axis of the antenna. For a half-wave dipole the radiation is maximum, 2.15 dBi perpendicular to the antenna axis, falling monotonically with elevation angle to zero on the axis, off the ends of the antenna.

Several different variations of the dipole are also used, such as thefolded dipole, short dipole, cage dipole, bow-tie, and batwing antenna. Dipoles may be used as standalone antennas themselves, but they are also employed as feed antennas (driven elements) in many more complex antenna types, such as the Yagi antenna, parabolic antenna, reflective array, turnstile antenna, log periodic antenna, and phased array.

Dipole characteristics

 

Dipole_receiving_antenna_animation_6_800x394x150ms

1. Impedance

The feedpoint impedance of a dipole antenna is very sensitive to its electrical length. Therefore, a dipole will generally only perform optimally over a rather narrow bandwidth, beyond which its impedance will become a poor match for the transmitter or receiver (and transmission line). The real (resistive) and imaginary (reactive) components of that impedance, as a function of electrical length, are shown in the accompanying graph.

DipoleImpedance-wide

A true half-wave dipole is one half of the wavelength λ in length, where λ=c/f in free space. Such a dipole has a feedpoint impedance consisting of 73Ω resistance and +43Ω reactance, thus presenting a slightly inductive reactance. In order to cancel that reactance, and present a pure resistance to the feedline, the element is shortened by the factor k for a net length of:

l=   \frac{1}{2} k \lambda  = \frac{1}{2} k \frac{c}{f}

The adjustment factor k, in order for the reactance to be cancelled, depends on the diameter of the conductor. For thin wires (diameter= 0.00001 wavelengths), k is approximately 0.98; for thick conductors (diameter= 0.008 wavelengths), k drops to about 0.94. This is because the effect of antenna length on reactance is much greater for thinner conductors. For the same reason, antennas with thicker conductors have a wider operating bandwidth over which they attain an acceptablestanding wave ratio.

DipoleImpedance

Dipole antennas of lengths approximately equal to any odd multiple of λ/2 are also resonant, presenting a small reactance (which can be cancelled by a small length adjustment). However these are rarely used. One size that is more practical though is a dipole with a length of 5/4 wavelengths. Not being close to 3/2 wavelengths, this antenna's impedance has a large (negative) reactance and can only be used with an impedance matching network (or "antenna tuner"). It is a desirable length because such an antenna has the highest gain for any dipole which isn't a great deal longer.

2. Radiation pattern and gain

Neglecting electrical inefficiency, the antenna gain is equal to the directive gain, which is 1.5 or 1.76 dBi for a short dipole, increasing to 1.64 or 2.15 dBi for a half-wave dipole. For a 5/4 wave dipole the gain further increases to about 5.2 dBi, making this length desirable for that reason even though the antenna is then off-resonance. Longer dipoles than that have radiation patterns that are multi-lobed, with poorer gain (unless they are much longer) even along the strongest lobe.

Dipole_xmting_antenna_animation_4_408x318x150ms

3. Feeding a dipole antenna

Ideally, a half-wave dipole should be fed using a balanced transmission line matching its typical 65 - 70Ω input impedance. Twin lead with a similar impedance is available but seldom used.

Many types of coaxial cable have a characteristic impedance of 75Ω, which would therefore be a good match for a half-wave dipole, however coax is an unbalanced transmission line (with one terminal at ground potential) whereas a dipole antenna presents a balanced input (both terminals have an equal but opposite voltage with respect to ground). When a balanced antenna is fed with a single-ended line, common mode currents can cause the coax line to radiate in addition to the antenna itself, distorting the radiation pattern and changing the impedance seen by the line. The dipole can be properly fed, and retain its expected characteristics, by using a balun in between the coaxial feedline and the antenna terminals. Connection of coax to a dipole antenna using a balun is plot  below.

DipolefeedradDipolewidebandbalunDipolehalfwavebalunDipolesleevebalun

Another solution, especially for receiving antennas, is to use common 300 ohm twin lead in conjunction with a folded dipole. The folded dipole is similar to the simple half-wave dipole but with the feedpoint impedance multiplied by 4, thus closely matching that 300 ohm impedance. This is the most common household antenna for fixed FM broadcast band tuners, which usually include balanced 300 ohm antenna input terminals.

4. detailed calculation

The current distribution is that of a standing wave, approximately sinusoidal along the length of the dipole, with a node at each end and an antinode (peak current) at the center (feedpoint):

Lambdaover2-antenna

I(z) = I_0 e^{i\omega t} \cos kz,

where k = 2π/λ and z runs from −L /2 to L /2.

In the far field, this produces a radiation pattern whose electric field is given by

E_\theta = \frac{-i Z_0 I_0}{2\pi r} \frac{\cos\left(\frac{\pi}{2}\cos\theta\right)}{\sin\theta} e^{i(\omega t - kr)}.

A numerical integration of this integral over all solid angle, as we did for the short dipole, supplies a value for the radiation resistance: R_{radiation} \approx 73.1 \ \Omega. Using the induced EMF method, the real part of the driving point impedance can also be written in terms of the cosine integral:

 

cd927fb01fb1d49ca7081634ca93d4cd

5 simlation result

image

转载于:https://www.cnblogs.com/hiramlee0534/p/5296755.html

  • 0
    点赞
  • 1
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论
目标检测(Object Detection)是计算机视觉领域的一个核心问题,其主要任务是找出图像中所有感兴趣的目标(物体),并确定它们的类别和位置。以下是对目标检测的详细阐述: 一、基本概念 目标检测的任务是解决“在哪里?是什么?”的问题,即定位出图像中目标的位置并识别出目标的类别。由于各类物体具有不同的外观、形状和姿态,加上成像时光照、遮挡等因素的干扰,目标检测一直是计算机视觉领域最具挑战性的任务之一。 二、核心问题 目标检测涉及以下几个核心问题: 分类问题:判断图像中的目标属于哪个类别。 定位问题:确定目标在图像中的具体位置。 大小问题:目标可能具有不同的大小。 形状问题:目标可能具有不同的形状。 三、算法分类 基于深度学习的目标检测算法主要分为两大类: Two-stage算法:先进行区域生成(Region Proposal),生成有可能包含待检物体的预选框(Region Proposal),再通过卷积神经网络进行样本分类。常见的Two-stage算法包括R-CNN、Fast R-CNN、Faster R-CNN等。 One-stage算法:不用生成区域提议,直接在网络中提取特征来预测物体分类和位置。常见的One-stage算法包括YOLO系列(YOLOv1、YOLOv2、YOLOv3、YOLOv4、YOLOv5等)、SSD和RetinaNet等。 四、算法原理 以YOLO系列为例,YOLO将目标检测视为回归问题,将输入图像一次性划分为多个区域,直接在输出层预测边界框和类别概率。YOLO采用卷积网络来提取特征,使用全连接层来得到预测值。其网络结构通常包含多个卷积层和全连接层,通过卷积层提取图像特征,通过全连接层输出预测结果。 五、应用领域 目标检测技术已经广泛应用于各个领域,为人们的生活带来了极大的便利。以下是一些主要的应用领域: 安全监控:在商场、银行
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值