The following is an excerpt from Windows Forms 2.0 Programming, Chris Sells & Michael Weinhardt, Addison-Wesley, 2006. It's been updated from the original version for C# 2.0. Once upon a time, in a strange land south of here, there was a worker named Peter. He was a diligent worker who would readily accept requests from his boss. However, his boss was a mean, untrusting man who insisted on steady progress reports. Since Peter did not want his boss standing in his office looking over his shoulder, Peter promised to notify his boss whenever his work progressed. Peter implemented this promise by periodically calling his boss back via a typed reference like so: class Worker { InterfacesNow Peter was a special person. Not only was he able to put up with his mean-spirited boss, but he also had a deep connection with the universe around him. So much so that he felt that the universe was interested in his progress. Unfortunately, there was no way for Peter to advise the Universe of his progress unless he added a special Advise method and special callbacks just for the Universe, in addition to keeping his boss informed. What Peter really wanted to do was to separate the list of potential notifications from the implementation of those notification methods. And so he decided to split the methods into an interface: interface IWorkerEvents { DelegatesUnfortunately, Peter was so busy talking his boss into implementing this interface that he didn't get around to notifying the Universe, but he knew he would soon. At least he'd abstracted the reference of his boss far away from him so that others who implemented the IWorkerEvents interface could be notified of his work progress. Still, his boss complained bitterly. "Peter!" his boss fumed. "Why are you bothering to notify me when you start your work or when your work is progressing?!? I don't care about those events. Not only do you force me to implement those methods, but you're wasting valuable work time waiting for me to return from the event, which is further expanded when I am far away! Can't you figure out a way to stop bothering me?" And so, Peter decided that while interfaces were useful for many things, when it came to events, their granularity was not fine enough. He wished to be able to notify interested parties only of the events that matched their hearts' desires. So, he decided to break the methods out of the interface into separate delegate functions, each of which acted like a little tiny interface of one method each: delegate void WorkStarted(); And, because Peter was under so much pressure, he decided to advantage of the shorthand notation for assigning delegates provided by C# 2.0: class Universe { Static ListenersDelegates accomplished the goal of not bothering his boss with events that he didn't want, but still Peter had not managed to get the universe on his list of listeners. Since the universe is an all-encompassing entity, it didn't seem right to hook delegates to instance members (imagine how many resources multiple instances of the universe would need...). Instead, Peter need to hook delegates to static members, which delegates support fully: class Universe { EventsUnfortunately, the Universe being very busy and unaccustomed to paying attention to individuals, has managed to replace Peter's boss's delegate with its own. This is an unintended side effect of making the delegate fields public in Peter's Worker class. Likewise, if Peter's boss gets impatient, he can decide to fire Peter's delegates himself (which is just the kind of rude thing that Peter's boss was apt to do): // Peter's boss taking matters into his own hands Peter wants to make sure that neither of these can happens. He realizes he needs to add registration and unregistration functions for each delegate so that listeners can add or remove themselves, but can't clear the entire list or fire Peter's events. Instead of implementing these functions himself, Peter uses the event keyword to make the C# compiler build these methods for him: class Worker { Peter knows that the event keyword erects a property around a delegate, only allowing clients to add or remove themselves (using the += and -= operators in C#), forcing his boss and the universe to play nicely: class Universe { Harvesting All ResultsAt this point, Peter breathes a sigh of relief. He has managed to satisfy the requirements of all his listeners without having to be closely coupled with the specific implementations. However, he notices that while both his boss and the universe provide grades of his work that he's only receiving one of the grades. In the face of multiple listeners, he'd really like to harvest all of their results. So, he reaches into his delegate and pulls out the list of listeners so that he can call each of them manually: class Worker { Asynchronous Notification: Fire & ForgetIn the meantime, his boss and the universe have been distracted with other things, which meant that the time it takes them to grade Peter's work is greatly expanded: class Boss { Unfortunately, since Peter is notifying each listener one at a time, waiting for each to grade him, these notifications now take up quite a bit of his time when he should be working. So, he decides to forget the grade and just fire the event asynchronously: class Worker { Asynchronous Notification: PollingThe call to BeginInvoke allows Peter to notify the listeners while letting Peter get back to work immediately, letting the process thread pool invoke the delegate. Over time, however, Peter finds that he misses the feedback on his work. He knows that he does a good job and appreciates the praise of the universe as a whole (if not his boss specifically). Plus, he�s afraid he�s leaking .NET resources acquired by calling BeginInvoke without calling the corresponding EndInvoke method, so, he fires the event asynchronously, but polls periodically, looking for the grade to be available: class Worker { Asynchronous Notification: DelegatesUnfortunately, Peter is back to what he wanted his boss to avoid with him in the beginning, i.e. looking over the shoulder of the entity doing the work. So, he decides to employ his own delegate as a means of notification when the asynchronous work has completed, allowing him to get back to work immediately, but still be notified when his work has been graded: class Worker { Anonymous DelegatesAt this point, Peter is using delegates to notify interested parties in the process of his work and using delegates to get notified when grades are available on the work he�s completed. The delegates provided by his boss and the universe are provided by separate entities, so it makes sense that they are encapsulated in methods on those entities. However, in the case of the WorkGraded method, there�s really no good reason for this to be a separate method except the syntactic requirements of C# 1.0. As of C# 2.0, Peter can drop the code required to handle the processing of his work grade into an anonymous delegate: class Worker { Here, instead of passing in the name of a method to call when his work has been graded, he�s passing in the body of the method itself as designated with a different use of the delegate keyword to create a method with no name (and therefore �anonymous�). The body of the method is fundamentally the same in that Peter still passes the WorkCompleted delegate as a parameter to BeginInvoke and then pulls it out of AsyncState for use in extracting the result. However, one of the benefits of anonymous delegates that Peter knows is that he can make use of the variables in the surrounding context from within the anonymous delegate body, causing him to rewrite his code thusly: class Worker { This code compiles just fine, but when it�s run, it will cause the following exception to be thrown: System.InvalidOperationException:
The IAsyncResult object provided does not match this delegate.
The problem is that while the wc variable is allowed to be used in the anonymous delegate, it�s still being used by the for-each statement. As soon as the asynchronous invocation begins, the wc variable changes and the delegate used to start things (wc) no longer matches the async result passed as an argument to the anonymous delegate. Peter slaps his head and creates a hybrid solution: class Worker { Happiness in the UniversePeter, his boss and the universe are finally satisfied. Peter's boss and the universe are allowed to be notified of the events that interest them, reducing the burden of implementation and the cost of unnecessary round-trips. Peter can notify them each, ignoring how long it takes them to return from their target methods, while still getting his results asynchronously and handling them using anonymous delegates, resulting in the following complete solution: delegate void WorkStarted(); Peter knows that getting results asynchronously comes with issues, because as soon as he fires events asynchronously, the target methods are likely to be executed on another thread, as is Peter's notification of when the target method has completed. However, Peter is good friends with Mike, who is very familiar with threading issues and can provide guidance in that area. And they all lived happily every after. The end. |
[Reprinted from Chris Sells & farproc's blog ( the chinese Escapist)]