说实话,这个题我第一次没解出来,是看了别人的思路才搞定的,中间在边界问题上还错了n次。惭愧。
先说一下解题思路。
一开始我能想到的思路是:merge sort然后输出array[median]即可。但是很明显这样的时间复杂度高于o(log(m+n)),大概是o(m+n)的复杂度。
时间复杂度的限制是解这个题比较让人郁闷的地方。
ok,再看题目条件,两个已经排好序的数组,时间复杂度是log,这样很容易让人想到什么?二分查找?
但是怎么用二分来解这个题?这儿有一点点数学知识。
具体的推导请看链接:http://blog.chinaunix.net/uid-28490468-id-3576490.html
之前看到也是一篇博客,可是已经找不到了。囧
ListNode *l;
class Solution {
public:
ListNode *addTwoNumbers(ListNode *l1, ListNode *l2) {
// Note: The Solution object is instantiated only once and is reused by each test case.
l1 = Reverse(l1);
l2 = Reverse(l2);
ListNode *ans = NULL;
ListNode *ansbackup = NULL;
int sum = 0;
int now = 0;
int next = 0;
while(true)
{
if(l1 == NULL || l2 == NULL)
break;
sum = l1->val + l2->val+next;
now = sum % 10;
next = sum / 10;
ListNode *tmp = new ListNode(now);
if(ans == NULL)
{
ans = tmp;
ansbackup = ans;
}
else
{
ans->next = tmp;
ans = ans->next;
}
l1 = l1->next;
l2 = l2->next;
}
if(l1 != NULL)
{
while(true)
{
if(l1 == NULL)break;
sum = l1->val + next;
now = sum % 10;
next = sum / 10;
ListNode * tmp = new ListNode(now);
ans->next = tmp;
ans = ans->next;
l1 = l1->next;
}
}
if(l2 != NULL)
{
while(true)
{
if(l2 == NULL)break;
sum = l2->val + next;
now = sum % 10;
next = sum / 10;
ListNode *tmp = new ListNode(now);
ans->next = tmp;
ans = ans->next;
l2 = l2->next;
}
}
if(next != 0)
{
ListNode *tmp = new ListNode(next);
ans->next = tmp;
ans = ans->next;
}
return ansbackup;
}
ListNode *Reverse(ListNode *l)
{
ListNode * before;
ListNode * now;
ListNode * next;
if(l->next == NULL)
return l;
before = l;
now = l->next;
while(now == NULL)
{
next = now->next;
now->next = before;
before = now;
now = next;
}
return before;
}
};