python find方法的复杂度_Python复杂度(运行时)

def f2(L):

sum = 0

i = 1

while i < len(L):

sum = sum + L[i]

i = i * 2

return sum

Let n be the size of the list L passed to this function. Which of the following most accurately describes how the runtime of this function grow as n grows?

(a) It grows linearly, like n does.

(b) It grows quadratically, like n^2 does.

(c) It grows less than linearly.

(d) It grows more than quadratically.

I don't understand how you figure out the relationship between the runtime of the function and the growth of n. Can someone please explain this to me?

解决方案

ok, since this is homework:

this is the code:

def f2(L):

sum = 0

i = 1

while i < len(L):

sum = sum + L[i]

i = i * 2

return sum

it is obviously dependant on len(L).

So lets see for each line, what it costs:

sum = 0

i = 1

# [...]

return sum

those are obviously constant time, independant of L.

In the loop we have:

sum = sum + L[i] # time to lookup L[i] (`timelookup(L)`) plus time to add to the sum (obviously constant time)

i = i * 2 # obviously constant time

and how many times is the loop executed?

it's obvously dependant on the size of L.

Lets call that loops(L)

so we got an overall complexity of

loops(L) * (timelookup(L) + const)

Being the nice guy I am, I'll tell you that list lookup is constant in python, so it boils down to

O(loops(L)) (constant factors ignored, as big-O convention implies)

And how often do you loop, based on the len() of L?

(a) as often as there are items in the list (b) quadratically as often as there are items in the list?

(c) less often as there are items in the list (d) more often than (b) ?

  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论

“相关推荐”对你有帮助么?

  • 非常没帮助
  • 没帮助
  • 一般
  • 有帮助
  • 非常有帮助
提交
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值