python复制dataframe,python Pandas DataFrame copy(deep = False)vs复制(deep = True)vs'='

Could somebody explain to me a difference between

df2 = df1

df2 = df1.copy()

df3 = df1.copy(deep=False)

I have tried all options and did as follows:

df1 = pd.DataFrame([1,2,3,4,5])

df2 = df1

df3 = df1.copy()

df4 = df1.copy(deep=False)

df1 = pd.DataFrame([9,9,9])

and returned as follows:

df1: [9,9,9]

df2: [1,2,3,4,5]

df3: [1,2,3,4,5]

df4: [1,2,3,4,5]

So, I observe no difference in the output between .copy() and .copy(deep=False). Why?

I would expect one of the options '=', copy(), copy(deep=False) to return [9,9,9]

What am I missing please?

解决方案

If you see the object IDs of the various DataFrames you create, you can clearly see what is happening.

When you write df2 = df1, you are creating a variable named df2, and binding it with an object with id 4541269200. When you write df1 = pd.DataFrame([9,9,9]), you are creating a new object with id 4541271120 and binding it to variable df1, but the object with id 4541269200 which was previously bound to df1 continues to live. If there were no variables bound to that object, it will get garbage collected by Python.

In[33]: import pandas as pd

In[34]: df1 = pd.DataFrame([1,2,3,4,5])

In[35]: id(df1)

Out[35]: 4541269200

In[36]: df2 = df1

In[37]: id(df2)

Out[37]: 4541269200 # Same id as df1

In[38]: df3 = df1.copy()

In[39]: id(df3)

Out[39]: 4541269584 # New object, new id.

In[40]: df4 = df1.copy(deep=False)

In[41]: id(df4)

Out[41]: 4541269072 # New object, new id.

In[42]: df1 = pd.DataFrame([9, 9, 9])

In[43]: id(df1)

Out[43]: 4541271120 # New object created and bound to name 'df1'.

In[44]: id(df2)

Out[44]: 4541269200 # Old object's id not impacted.

Edit: Added on 7/30/2018

Deep copying doesn't work in pandas and the devs consider putting mutable objects inside a DataFrame as an antipattern. Consider the following:

In[10]: arr1 = [1, 2, 3]

In[11]: arr2 = [1, 2, 3, 4]

In[12]: df1 = pd.DataFrame([[arr1], [arr2]], columns=['A'])

In[13]: df1.applymap(id)

Out[13]:

A

0 4515714832

1 4515734952

In[14]: df2 = df1.copy(deep=True)

In[15]: df2.applymap(id)

Out[15]:

A

0 4515714832

1 4515734952

In[16]: df2.loc[0, 'A'].append(55)

In[17]: df2

Out[17]:

A

0 [1, 2, 3, 55]

1 [1, 2, 3, 4]

In[18]: df1

Out[18]:

A

0 [1, 2, 3, 55]

1 [1, 2, 3, 4]

df2, if it was a true deep copy should have had new ids for the lists contained within it. As a result, when you modify a list inside df2, it affects the list inside df1 as well, because they are the same objects.

  • 1
    点赞
  • 1
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值