java filechannel 性能_Java NIO FileChannel与FileOutputstream的性能/有用性

我试图弄清楚当我们使用nio FileChannel和normal FileInputStream/FileOuputStream来读写文件到文件系统时，性能(或优势)是否存在任何差异。我观察到，在我的机器上，两者的性能都相同，而且FileChannel速度也慢了很多倍。我能否请你比较这两种方法的更多详细信息。这是我使用的代码，正在测试的文件在左右350MB。如果我不考虑随机访问或其他此类高级功能，是否可以将基于NIO的类用于文件I / O是一个好选择吗？

package trialjavaprograms;

import java.io.File;

import java.io.FileInputStream;

import java.io.FileOutputStream;

import java.io.InputStream;

import java.nio.ByteBuffer;

import java.nio.channels.FileChannel;

public class JavaNIOTest {

public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {

useNormalIO();

useFileChannel();

}

private static void useNormalIO() throws Exception {

File file = new File("/home/developer/test.iso");

File oFile = new File("/home/developer/test2");

long time1 = System.currentTimeMillis();

InputStream is = new FileInputStream(file);

FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream(oFile);

byte[] buf = new byte[64 * 1024];

int len = 0;

while((len = is.read(buf)) != -1) {

fos.write(buf, 0, len);

}

fos.flush();

fos.close();

is.close();

long time2 = System.currentTimeMillis();

System.out.println("Time taken: "+(time2-time1)+" ms");

}

private static void useFileChannel() throws Exception {

File file = new File("/home/developer/test.iso");

File oFile = new File("/home/developer/test2");

long time1 = System.currentTimeMillis();

FileInputStream is = new FileInputStream(file);

FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream(oFile);

FileChannel f = is.getChannel();

FileChannel f2 = fos.getChannel();

ByteBuffer buf = ByteBuffer.allocateDirect(64 * 1024);

long len = 0;

while((len = f.read(buf)) != -1) {

buf.flip();

f2.write(buf);

buf.clear();

}

f2.close();

f.close();

long time2 = System.currentTimeMillis();

System.out.println("Time taken: "+(time2-time1)+" ms");

}

}