Equalization
In a multipath fading scattering environment, the receiver typically detects several
constantly changing, delayed versions of the transmitted signal. These time-dispersive
channels cause intersymbol interference (ISI) that occurs when symbols received from multiple
paths are delayed and overlap in time. ISI causes high error rates because the symbols from
multiple received paths interfere with each other and become indistinguishable by the
receiver.
Equalizers attempt to mitigate ISI and improve the receiver performance. Equalizer
structures are filters that attempt to match the propagation channel response. For
time-varying propagation channels, adapting the equalization filter tap weights so that they
maintain a match to the channel over time improves the error rate performance.Equalizer Structure Options
The Communications Toolbox™ includes System objects and blocks to recover transmitted data using by
linear, decision-feedback, or maximum-likelihood sequence estimation (MLSE) equalization
structures. For more information, see Selected References for Equalizers.
This figure shows the high-level configuration options for each equalization
structure.
For each equalizer structure, you can configure structural settings (such as the number
of taps and initial set of tap weights), algorithmic settings (such as the step size), and
the signal constellation used by the modulator in your design. You also specify adaptability
of the equalizer tap weights throughout the simulation.
Linear and decision-feedback filter equalizer structures adapt tap weights by
using the LMS, RLS, or CMA adaptive algorithm. When using these equalizer structures,
the number of samples per symbol determines whether symbols are processed using whole
or fractional symbol spacing.
When using LMS and RLS adaptive algorithms, the equalizer begins operating
in tap weights training mode. Configure the equalizer to operate adaptively in
decision-directed mode or without further adjustment of taps after training is
completed.
When using the CMA adaptive algorithm, the equalizer has no training mode.
You can configure the equalizer to operate adaptively in decision-directed mode
or in nonadaptive mode.
To explore the linear and decision-feedback filter equalizer
capabilities, see Adaptive Equalizers.
Maximum-Likelihood Sequence Estimation (MLSE) equalizers use the Viterbi
algorithm. The MLSE equalization structure provides the optimal match to the received
symbols but it requires an accurate channel estimate and is the most computationally
complex structure. To explore MLSE equalizer capabilities, see MLSE Equalizers.
The computational complexity of each equalization structure grows with the length of the
channel time dispersion. Considering the Doppler and frequency selectivity characteristics
of the channel, use the information in this table when selecting which equalization
structure to use in your simulation.
Equalizer StructureDoppler SpeedIs Channel Frequency Selective?Computational ComplexityLinear RLSHighNoMedium
Linear LMSLowNoLowest
Linear CMALowNoLowest
DFE RLSHighYesMedium
DFE LMSLowYesLowest
DFE CMALowYesLowest
MLSELowYesHighestSelected References for Equalizers
[1] Farhang-Boroujeny, B., Adaptive Filters: Theory
and Applications, Chichester, England, John Wiley & Sons,
1998.
[2] Haykin, Simon, Adaptive Filter
Theory, Third Ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice-Hall,
1996.
[3] Kurzweil, Jack, An Introduction to Digital
Communications, New York, John Wiley & Sons, 2000.
[4] Proakis, John G., Digital
Communications, Fourth Ed., New York, McGraw-Hill, 2001.
[5] Steele, Raymond, Ed., Mobile Radio
Communications, Chichester, England, John Wiley & Sons,
1996.
See Also
Objects
Blocks
Related Topics