mysql命令行客户端在哪_mysql命令行客户端

Hello, I''m a php/mysql beginner...

Is there any way of making the mysql command line client full-screen?

Sometimes it''s easier to use the client than go thru php, but

since it''s only about 80 characters wide that limits its usefulness.

Thanks,

Gerard [http://homepage.eircom.net/~gerfmcc]

解决方案ge******@indigo.ie kirjoitti:

Hello, I''m a php/mysql beginner...

Is there any way of making the mysql command line client full-screen?

Sometimes it''s easier to use the client than go thru php, but

since it''s only about 80 characters wide that limits its usefulness.

That''s not really a php question, is it? Please post this question

somewhere else, this is php. :)

--

Ra*********@gmail.com

"Wikipedia on v?h?n niinq internetin raamattu, kukaan ei pohjimmiltaan

usko siihen ja kukaan ei tied? mik? pit?? paikkansa." -- z00ze

On 29 Jul, 04:40, zach

Although

its not a PHP question is certainly is related

Related? Why, because people can use php to talk to mysql?

So, let''s have MS windows questions on this group (because php can run

under windows)

Let''s have business process questions (because it can be used to solve

business problems)

Let''s have ...

Jerry Stuckle

>Yes, please ignore this asshole. >This is a PHP newsgroup, for questions on PHP. If you have a mysql

question, you will be better served asking in a MySQL newsgroup, such as

comp.databases.mysql. >Usenet is split up into over 36,000 newsgroups (on my server, anyway),

each with their own purpose. And if people ignore that purpose, soon

you''ll get all kinds of off-topic questions in all kinds of newsgroups. >We have enough problems with non-PHP questions in this group without

assholes like Zach encouraging others to post off-topic questions. >--

==================

Remove the "x" from my email address

Jerry Stuckle

JDS Computer Training Corp.

js*******@attglobal.net

==================

I did a search for MySQL newsgroups but there are none available on my

ISP''s newsgroup server, hence my request for assistance here.

I think Zach was right; the question was short and near enough

on-topic to be considered relevant, and apparently there was a concise

answer.

Unfortunately, several other people felt it was necessary to wag their

fingers. Please stop for a moment to consider whether such knee-jerk

responses are always appropriate.

Gerard