当尝试为多个平台编译以下(简化)代码时,我发现它在某些方面是失败的,即IBM的xlC_r.进一步的调查发现,它也没有进来和cl..它与g和Solaris的CC成功编译.
这是代码：
int main()
{
int a1[1];
bool a2[1];
for (int *it = a1, *end = a1+1; it != end; ++it) {
//...
bool *jt = a2, *end = a2+1;
//...
}
}
xlC_r错误：
"main.cpp", line 8.25: 1540-0400 (S) "end" has a conflicting declaration.
"main.cpp", line 6.25: 1540-0425 (I) "end" is defined on line 6 of "main.cpp".
ang子错误：
main.cpp:8:25: error: redefinition of 'end' with a different type
bool *jt = a2, *end = a2+1;
^
main.cpp:6:25: note: previous definition is here
for (int *it = a1, *end = a1+1; it != end; ++it) {
^
来错误：
"ComeauTest.c", line 8: error: "end", declared in for-loop initialization, may not
be redeclared in this scope
bool *jt = a2, *end = a2+1;
^
问题是为什么这是一个错误？
看看2003年的标准,它说如下(6.5.3)：
The for statement
for ( for-init-statement; condition; expression ) statement
is equivalent to
{
for-init-statement;
while ( condition ) {
statement;
expression;
}
}
except that names declared in the for-init-statement are in the same
declarative-region as those declared in condition
这里没有声明的名称.
另外,它说(6.5.1)：
When the condition of a while statement is a declaration, the scope
of the variable that is declared extends from its point of declaration
(3.3.1) to the end of the while statement. A while statement of the form
while (T t = x) statement
is equivalent to
label:
{
T t = x;
if (t) {
statement;
goto label;
}
}
再次,我不知道这是相关的,因为没有声明在条件.所以给出6.5.3的等效重写,我的代码应该是一样的：
int main()
{
int a1[1];
bool a2[1];
{
int *it = a1, *end = a1+1;
while (it != end) {
//...
bool *jt = a2, *end = a2+1;
//...
++it;
}
}
}
这显然会允许结束重新声明.
扫一扫
4750
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
