java 中方法的可变参数_Java中可变参数方法的性能

我有同样的问题，转向实验。

public class ArgTest {

int summation(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e, int f) {

return a + b + c + d + e + f;

}

int summationVArgs(int... args) {

int sum = 0;

for (int arg : args) {

sum += arg;

}

return sum;

}

final static public int META_ITERATIONS = 200;

final static public int ITERATIONS = 1000000;

static public void main(String[] args) {

final ArgTest at = new ArgTest();

for (int loop = 0; loop < META_ITERATIONS; loop++) {

int sum = 0;

final long fixedStart = System.currentTimeMillis();

for (int i = 0; i < ITERATIONS; i++) {

sum += at.summation(2312, 45569, -9816, 19122, 4991, 901776);

}

final long fixedEnd = System.currentTimeMillis();

final long vargStart = fixedEnd;

for (int i = 0; i < ITERATIONS; i++) {

sum += at.summationVArgs(2312, 45569, -9816, 19122, 4991, 901776);

}

final long vargEnd = System.currentTimeMillis();

System.out.printf("%03d:%d Fixed-Args: %d ms\n", loop+1, ITERATIONS, fixedEnd - fixedStart);

System.out.printf("%03d:%d Vargs-Args: %d ms\n", loop+1, ITERATIONS, vargEnd - vargStart);

}

System.exit(0);

}

}如果在现代JVM(此处为1.8.0_20)上运行此代码，您将看到可变数量的参数会导致性能开销，也可能导致内存消耗。

我只发布前25次运行：

001:1000000 Fixed-Args: 16 ms

001:1000000 Vargs-Args: 45 ms

002:1000000 Fixed-Args: 13 ms

002:1000000 Vargs-Args: 32 ms

003:1000000 Fixed-Args: 0 ms

003:1000000 Vargs-Args: 27 ms

004:1000000 Fixed-Args: 0 ms

004:1000000 Vargs-Args: 22 ms

005:1000000 Fixed-Args: 0 ms

005:1000000 Vargs-Args: 38 ms

006:1000000 Fixed-Args: 0 ms

006:1000000 Vargs-Args: 11 ms

007:1000000 Fixed-Args: 0 ms

007:1000000 Vargs-Args: 17 ms

008:1000000 Fixed-Args: 0 ms

008:1000000 Vargs-Args: 40 ms

009:1000000 Fixed-Args: 0 ms

009:1000000 Vargs-Args: 89 ms

010:1000000 Fixed-Args: 0 ms

010:1000000 Vargs-Args: 21 ms

011:1000000 Fixed-Args: 0 ms

011:1000000 Vargs-Args: 16 ms

012:1000000 Fixed-Args: 0 ms

012:1000000 Vargs-Args: 26 ms

013:1000000 Fixed-Args: 0 ms

013:1000000 Vargs-Args: 7 ms

014:1000000 Fixed-Args: 0 ms

014:1000000 Vargs-Args: 7 ms

015:1000000 Fixed-Args: 0 ms

015:1000000 Vargs-Args: 6 ms

016:1000000 Fixed-Args: 0 ms

016:1000000 Vargs-Args: 141 ms

017:1000000 Fixed-Args: 0 ms

017:1000000 Vargs-Args: 139 ms

018:1000000 Fixed-Args: 0 ms

018:1000000 Vargs-Args: 106 ms

019:1000000 Fixed-Args: 0 ms

019:1000000 Vargs-Args: 70 ms

020:1000000 Fixed-Args: 0 ms

020:1000000 Vargs-Args: 6 ms

021:1000000 Fixed-Args: 0 ms

021:1000000 Vargs-Args: 5 ms

022:1000000 Fixed-Args: 0 ms

022:1000000 Vargs-Args: 6 ms

023:1000000 Fixed-Args: 0 ms

023:1000000 Vargs-Args: 12 ms

024:1000000 Fixed-Args: 0 ms

024:1000000 Vargs-Args: 37 ms

025:1000000 Fixed-Args: 0 ms

025:1000000 Vargs-Args: 12 ms

...即使在最好的时候，Vargs-Args也从未降到0ms。