python web服务器 比较_Python flask 与 GO WEB服务器性能对比

测试环境:

系统: CentOS 7.1

Mem: 8G

CPU: 虚拟机16核

Python版本: python3.6

Flask版本: 0.12.2

Golang版本: 1.6.3

1.首先写一个Flask的web程序,只返回一个 Hello word!

from flask import Flask, render_template

app = Flask(__name__)

@app.route('/')

def hello_world():

return 'Hello word!'

if __name__ == '__main__':

app.run()

2.写一个go语言的web程序,也返回一个 Hello word!

package main

import (

f "fmt"

"log"

"net/http"

)

func sayhelloName(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {

f.Fprintln(w, "hello world!")

}

func main() {

http.HandleFunc("/", sayhelloName)

err := http.ListenAndServe(":8080", nil)

if err != nil {

log.Fatal("ListenAndServe:", err)

}

}

3.直接在控制台启动Flask, 用压力测试工具模拟并发请求。这里模拟100个并发100000个请求。

ab -n 100000 -c 100 "http://172.30.200.88:5000/"

Server Software: Werkzeug/0.12.2

Server Hostname: 172.30.200.88

Server Port: 5000

Document Path: /

Document Length: 11 bytes

Concurrency Level: 100

Time taken for tests: 88.441 seconds

Complete requests: 100000

Failed requests: 0

Write errors: 0

Total transferred: 16500000 bytes

HTML transferred: 1100000 bytes

Requests per second: 1130.70 [#/sec] (mean)

Time per request: 88.441 [ms] (mean)

Time per request: 0.884 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)

Transfer rate: 182.19 [Kbytes/sec] received

4.用Gunicorn以8个进程启动flask,再以同样的并发测试一遍

Server Software: gunicorn/19.7.1

Server Hostname: 172.30.200.88

Server Port: 8080

Document Path: /

Document Length: 11 bytes

Concurrency Level: 100

Time taken for tests: 15.842 seconds

Complete requests: 100000

Failed requests: 0

Write errors: 0

Total transferred: 17100000 bytes

HTML transferred: 1100000 bytes

Requests per second: 6312.50 [#/sec] (mean)

Time per request: 15.842 [ms] (mean)

Time per request: 0.158 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)

Transfer rate: 1054.14 [Kbytes/sec] received

5.以同样的并发测试Go

Server Software:

Server Hostname: 172.30.200.88

Server Port: 8080

Document Path: /

Document Length: 13 bytes

Concurrency Level: 100

Time taken for tests: 12.460 seconds

Complete requests: 100000

Failed requests: 0

Write errors: 0

Total transferred: 13000000 bytes

HTML transferred: 1300000 bytes

Requests per second: 8025.80 [#/sec] (mean)

Time per request: 12.460 [ms] (mean)

Time per request: 0.125 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)

Transfer rate: 1018.90 [Kbytes/sec] received

测试结果:

Flask 总耗时 88.441秒,平均每秒处理1130个请求

Gunicorn多进程时耗时 15.842, 平均每秒处理 6312个请求

Go 总耗时 12.46秒,每秒处理 8025个请求

相比之下 go跟gunicorn的处理速度有提升,但是并没有像传说中十倍的性能。在测试中还发现,在用flask的时候并不能支持大并发,当并发在200以上就很容易报错了, 而Golang的并发到1000都能正常运行,这一点上差距比较大。

  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值