jle汇编,关于AT& T语法汇编中的cmp / jg,jle等

So every single resource online tells me that something like this:

cmp %eax, %ebx

jg < something >

would jump to < something > if eax was greater than ebx. But I have another piece of code that seems to contradict this:

cmp $0x2, %eax

jg < something>

as it jumps to < something > when eax has the value 3.

Am I missing something, or does cmp a, b - jg execute if b > a and not a>b? And does this apply to other jump statements as well?

解决方案

When we read something like

cmp $0x2, %eax

jg < something >

we know the assembler used is one that reverses the position of the operands of an instruction. That's because Intel's syntax dictates that the destination operand comes before the source operand and clearly an immediate value like $0x2 can't ever be a destination!

Knowing the order of things we now interpret your first code snippet as

cmp ebx, eax

jg < something > ;jump if EBX > EAX

and the second code snippet as

cmp eax, 2

jg < something > ;jump if EAX > 2

And does this apply to other jump statements as well?

It does.

评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值