本文探讨了在AT&T汇编语法中cmp指令与jg等跳转指令的使用。通常cmp %eax, %ebx后，jg会在eax大于ebx时跳转，但示例代码中当eax为3时，cmp $0x2, %eax jg也会跳转，这引发了疑问。实际上，这是由于AT&T语法中操作数位置的反转，正确的理解应为cmp eax, 2，即在eax大于2时跳转。这种现象同样适用于其他跳转指令。"
132062829,7329715,使用Arduino驱动MG-811 CO2传感器教程,"['Arduino', '传感器驱动', '气体传感器', 'CO2检测', '电子制作']
So every single resource online tells me that something like this:
cmp %eax, %ebx
jg < something >
would jump to < something > if eax was greater than ebx. But I have another piece of code that seems to contradict this:
cmp $0x2, %eax
jg < something>
as it jumps to < something > when eax has the value 3.
Am I missing something, or does cmp a, b - jg execute if b > a and not a>b? And does this apply to other jump statements as well?
解决方案
When we read something like
cmp $0x2, %eax
jg < something >
we know the assembler used is one that reverses the position of the operands of an instruction. That's because Intel's syntax dictates that the destination operand comes before the source operand and clearly an immediate value like $0x2 can't ever be a destination!
Knowing the order of things we now interpret your first code snippet as
cmp ebx, eax
jg < something > ;jump if EBX > EAX
and the second code snippet as
cmp eax, 2
jg < something > ;jump if EAX > 2
And does this apply to other jump statements as well?
It does.
2758
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
