这看起来效果不错。它返回一个生成器对象,因此唯一的内存使用是n-位整数r。在
别用这个!import random
def rand_bools(n):
r = random.getrandbits(n)
return ( bool((r>>i)&1) for i in xrange(n) )
用法:
^{pr2}$
它的工作原理是连续移位r,屏蔽低位,并在每次迭代中将其转换为bool。在
编辑:这个故事的寓意是对代码进行基准测试!从Blender得到提示后,我编写了以下测试:import random
import time
def test_one(N):
a = 0
t0 = time.time()
for i in xrange(N):
if random.getrandbits(1): a += 1
return time.time() - t0
def rand_bools_int_func(n):
r = random.getrandbits(n)
return ( bool((r>>i)&1) for i in xrange(n) )
def test_generator(gen):
a = 0
t0 = time.time()
for b in gen:
if b: a += 1
return time.time() - t0
def test(N):
print 'For N={0}'.format(N)
print ' getrandbits(1) in for loop {0} sec'.format(test_one(N))
gen = ( not random.getrandbits(1) for i in xrange(N) )
print ' getrandbits(1) generator using not {0} sec'.format(test_generator(gen))
gen = ( bool(random.getrandbits(1)) for i in xrange(N))
print ' getrandbits(1) generator using bool() {0} sec'.format(test_generator(gen))
if (N < 10**6): # Way too slow!
gen = rand_bools_int_func(N)
print ' getrandbits(n) with shift/mask {0} sec'.format(test_generator(gen))
def main():
for i in xrange(3,8):
test(10**i)
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
结果:C:\Users\Jonathon\temp>python randbool.py
For N=1000
getrandbits(1) in for loop 0.0 sec
getrandbits(1) generator using not 0.0 sec
getrandbits(1) generator using bool() 0.0 sec
getrandbits(n) with shift/mask 0.0 sec
For N=10000
getrandbits(1) in for loop 0.00200009346008 sec
getrandbits(1) generator using not 0.00300002098083 sec
getrandbits(1) generator using bool() 0.00399994850159 sec
getrandbits(n) with shift/mask 0.0169999599457 sec
For N=100000
getrandbits(1) in for loop 0.0230000019073 sec
getrandbits(1) generator using not 0.029000043869 sec
getrandbits(1) generator using bool() 0.0380001068115 sec
getrandbits(n) with shift/mask 1.20000004768 sec
For N=1000000
getrandbits(1) in for loop 0.233999967575 sec
getrandbits(1) generator using not 0.289999961853 sec
getrandbits(1) generator using bool() 0.37700009346 sec
For N=10000000
getrandbits(1) in for loop 2.34899997711 sec
getrandbits(1) generator using not 2.89400005341 sec
getrandbits(1) generator using bool() 3.76900005341 sec
最后,我的回答是“有趣的解决方案,,但不要使用它”!简单地使用random.getrandbits(1)要快得多。在