php md5文件比较,PHP: md5_file - Manual

最新推荐文章于 2021-12-10 17:50:51 发布

weixin_39856589

最新推荐文章于 2021-12-10 17:50:51 发布

阅读量182

点赞数

文章标签： php md5文件比较

这篇博客对比了使用`md5_file`和`openssl md5`对不同大小文件进行哈希校验的速度。结果显示，随着文件大小增加，性能差异也相应增大。对于1MB、2MB和10MB的文件，`openssl md5`在处理大文件时表现出更快的速度。这提示我们在处理文件时应考虑文件大小和所选工具的性能表现。

摘要由CSDN通过智能技术生成

In response to using exec instead for performance (Nov 13 2007 post), It looks like the performance depends on the size of the file. See the results below using the same script from the original post. The first hash is with md5_file and the second is with openssl md5.

With a 1MB file:

Hash = df1555ec0c2d7fcad3a03770f9aa238a; time = 0.005006

Hash = df1555ec0c2d7fcad3a03770f9aa238a; time = 0.01498

With a 2MB file:

Hash = 4387904830a4245a8ab767e5937d722c; time = 0.010393

Hash = 4387904830a4245a8ab767e5937d722c; time = 0.016691

With a 10MB file:

Hash = b89f948e98f3a113dc13fdbd3bdb17ef; time = 0.241907

Hash = b89f948e98f3a113dc13fdbd3bdb17ef; time = 0.037597

Performance seems to change proportionally with the file size. Judging from the previous post's default file name (.mov) he/she was probably dealing with a large file. These are just quick tests and far from a perfect benchmark, but you might want to test your own files before assuming that the openssl solution is faster (ie, if working with small text files vs. movies, etc)