php md5文件比较,PHP: md5_file - Manual

In response to using exec instead for performance (Nov 13 2007 post), It looks like the performance depends on the size of the file.  See the results below using the same script from the original post.  The first hash is with md5_file and the second is with openssl md5.

With a 1MB file:

Hash = df1555ec0c2d7fcad3a03770f9aa238a; time = 0.005006

Hash = df1555ec0c2d7fcad3a03770f9aa238a; time = 0.01498

With a 2MB file:

Hash = 4387904830a4245a8ab767e5937d722c; time = 0.010393

Hash = 4387904830a4245a8ab767e5937d722c; time = 0.016691

With a 10MB file:

Hash = b89f948e98f3a113dc13fdbd3bdb17ef; time = 0.241907

Hash = b89f948e98f3a113dc13fdbd3bdb17ef; time = 0.037597

Performance seems to change proportionally with the file size.  Judging from the previous post's default file name (.mov) he/she was probably dealing with a large file.  These are just quick tests and far from a perfect benchmark, but you might want to test your own files before assuming that the openssl solution is faster (ie, if working with small text files vs. movies, etc)