lisp不是函授型语言_Lisp是不是一种函数式编程语言？

最新推荐文章于 2020-12-21 03:50:57 发布

weixin_39931101

最新推荐文章于 2020-12-21 03:50:57 发布

阅读量88

点赞数

文章标签： lisp不是函授型语言

本文链接：https://blog.csdn.net/weixin_39931101/article/details/111763505

版权

I read in the book: "Masterminds of programming" , the the interview with Guido Van Rossum says:

The more fundamental property Python shares with Lisp ( not a functional language either! ) is that functionas are first-class objects...

So, Lisp is not a functional programming language?

Is Guido wrong? What is it then?

解决方案

Pretty much every Lisp I know of can be used to program in a functional style (all you really need are first-class functions, after all!)

However, Lisps are more like multi-language toolkits: you can do functional programming, OOP, logic programming, define your own DSL for some whacky new paradigm etc.

The Lisp that is probably closest to a functional programming style is Clojure (it has lazy evaluation, discourages OOP, uses immutable data structures throughout, restricts uncontrolled mutation (via STM), has quite a lot of pure / higher order functions in the core library etc.)