lda php,LDA+U遇到的一个奇怪的问题??? - 第一原理 - 小木虫 - 学术 科研 互动社区...

CODE:

Program PWSCF v.5.0        starts on  9Jun2012 at 18: 0: 7

This program is part of the open-source Quantum ESPRESSO suite

for quantum simulation of materials; please cite

"P. Giannozzi et al., J. Phys.:Condens. Matter 21 395502 (2009);

URL http://www.quantum-espresso.org",

in publications or presentations arising from this work. More details at

http://www.quantum-espresso.org/quote.php

Parallel version (MPI), running on     2 processors

R & G space division:  proc/pool =    2

Current dimensions of program PWSCF are:

Max number of different atomic species (ntypx) = 10

Max number of k-points (npk) =  40000

Max angular momentum in pseudopotentials (lmaxx) =  3

Waiting for input...

Reading input from standard input

file N.pz-rrkjus.UPF: wavefunction(s)  2S renormalized

Subspace diagonalization in iterative solution of the eigenvalue problem:

a serial algorithm will be used

Parallelization info

--------------------

sticks:   dense  smooth     PW     G-vecs:    dense   smooth      PW

Min         708     291     81                35404     9014    1435

Max         709     292     82                35411     9015    1440

Sum        1417     583    163                70815    18029    2875

bravais-lattice index     =            4

lattice parameter (alat)  =       6.7960  a.u.

unit-cell volume          =     439.8142 (a.u.)^3

number of atoms/cell      =            4

number of atomic types    =            2

number of electrons       =        36.00

number of Kohn-Sham states=           22

kinetic-energy cutoff     =      45.0000  Ry

charge density cutoff     =     450.0000  Ry

convergence threshold     =      1.0E-06

mixing beta               =       0.7000

number of iterations used =            8  plain     mixing

Exchange-correlation      =  SLA  PZ   NOGX NOGC ( 1 1 0 0 0)

EXX-fraction              =        0.00

celldm(1)=   6.796000  celldm(2)=   0.000000  celldm(3)=   1.618000

celldm(4)=   0.000000  celldm(5)=   0.000000  celldm(6)=   0.000000

crystal axes: (cart. coord. in units of alat)

a(1) = (   1.000000   0.000000   0.000000 )

a(2) = (  -0.500000   0.866025   0.000000 )

a(3) = (   0.000000   0.000000   1.618000 )

reciprocal axes: (cart. coord. in units 2 pi/alat)

b(1) = (  1.000000  0.577350 -0.000000 )

b(2) = (  0.000000  1.154701  0.000000 )

b(3) = (  0.000000 -0.000000  0.618047 )

PseudoPot. # 1 for In read from file:

/home/xijun/espresso/pseudo/In.pz-d-rrkjus.UPF

MD5 check sum: ec4b7502086f46f0fa2ea5856329c8f0

Pseudo is Ultrasoft + core correction, Zval = 13.0

Generated by new atomic code, or converted to UPF format

Using radial grid of 1241 points,  4 beta functions with:

l(1) =   2

l(2) =   2

l(3) =   0

l(4) =   0

Q(r) pseudized with 0 coefficients

PseudoPot. # 2 for N  read from file:

/home/xijun/espresso/pseudo/N.pz-rrkjus.UPF

MD5 check sum: 9152467a3ef5f298703596eb0e9fbbb1

Pseudo is Ultrasoft, Zval =  5.0

Generated by new atomic code, or converted to UPF format

Using radial grid of 1257 points,  4 beta functions with:

l(1) =   0

l(2) =   0

l(3) =   1

l(4) =   1

Q(r) pseudized with 0 coefficients

atomic species   valence    mass     pseudopotential

In            13.00   114.82000     In( 1.00)

N              5.00    14.00700     N ( 1.00)

-----

simplified LDA+U calculation, Hubbard_lmax = 2

atomic species  L   Hubbard U  Hubbard alpha

In           2    4.000000    0.000000

-----

6 Sym. Ops. (no inversion) found

Cartesian axes

site n.     atom                  positions (alat units)

1           In  tau(   1) = (  -0.0000000   0.5773503   0.0033802  )

2           In  tau(   2) = (   0.5000000   0.2886751   0.8124101  )

3           N   tau(   3) = (  -0.0000000   0.5773503   0.6156006  )

4           N   tau(   4) = (   0.5000000   0.2886751   1.4247026  )

number of k points=    13  Methfessel-Paxton smearing, width (Ry)=  0.0200

cart. coord. in units 2pi/alat

k(    1) = (   0.0000000   0.0000000   0.0000000), wk =   0.0312500

k(    2) = (   0.0000000   0.0000000   0.1545117), wk =   0.0625000

k(    3) = (   0.0000000   0.0000000  -0.3090235), wk =   0.0312500

k(    4) = (   0.0000000   0.2886751   0.0000000), wk =   0.1875000

k(    5) = (   0.0000000   0.2886751   0.1545117), wk =   0.1875000

k(    6) = (   0.0000000   0.2886751  -0.3090235), wk =   0.1875000

k(    7) = (   0.0000000  -0.5773503   0.0000000), wk =   0.0937500

k(    8) = (   0.0000000  -0.5773503   0.1545117), wk =   0.1875000

k(    9) = (   0.0000000  -0.5773503  -0.3090235), wk =   0.0937500

k(   10) = (   0.2500000   0.4330127   0.0000000), wk =   0.1875000

k(   11) = (   0.2500000   0.4330127   0.1545117), wk =   0.3750000

k(   12) = (   0.2500000   0.4330127  -0.3090235), wk =   0.1875000

k(   13) = (   0.0000000  -0.2886751   0.1545117), wk =   0.1875000

Dense  grid:    70815 G-vectors     FFT dimensions: (  45,  45,  75)

Smooth grid:    18029 G-vectors     FFT dimensions: (  30,  30,  48)

Largest allocated arrays     est. size (Mb)     dimensions

Kohn-Sham Wavefunctions         0.38 Mb     (   1137,   22)

Atomic wavefunctions            0.45 Mb     (   1137,   26)

NL pseudopotentials             0.69 Mb     (   1137,   40)

Each V/rho on FFT grid          1.17 Mb     (  76950)

Each G-vector array             0.27 Mb     (  35404)

G-vector shells                 0.02 Mb     (   3159)

Largest temporary arrays     est. size (Mb)     dimensions

Auxiliary wavefunctions         1.53 Mb     (   1137,   88)

Each subspace H/S matrix        0.12 Mb     (  88,  88)

Each matrix      0.01 Mb     (     40,   22)

Arrays for rho mixing           9.39 Mb     (  76950,   8)

Check: negative/imaginary core charge=   -0.000009    0.000000

Initial potential from superposition of free atoms

starting charge   35.99450, renormalised to   36.00000

Number of +U iterations with fixed ns =  0

Starting occupations:

--- enter write_ns ---

LDA+U parameters:

U( 1)     =  4.00000000

alpha( 1) =  0.00000000

atom    1   Tr[ns(na)] =  10.00000

eigenvalues:

1.000  1.000  1.000  1.000  1.000

eigenvectors:

1.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000

0.000  1.000  0.000  0.000  0.000

0.000  0.000  1.000  0.000  0.000

0.000  0.000  0.000  1.000  0.000

0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  1.000

occupations:

1.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000

0.000  1.000  0.000  0.000  0.000

0.000  0.000  1.000  0.000  0.000

0.000  0.000  0.000  1.000  0.000

0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  1.000

atom    2   Tr[ns(na)] =  10.00000

eigenvalues:

1.000  1.000  1.000  1.000  1.000

eigenvectors:

1.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000

0.000  1.000  0.000  0.000  0.000

0.000  0.000  1.000  0.000  0.000

0.000  0.000  0.000  1.000  0.000

0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  1.000

occupations:

1.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000

0.000  1.000  0.000  0.000  0.000

0.000  0.000  1.000  0.000  0.000

0.000  0.000  0.000  1.000  0.000

0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  1.000

N of occupied +U levels =  20.0000000

--- exit write_ns ---

Atomic wfc used for LDA+U Projector are NOT orthogonalized

Starting wfc are   26 randomized atomic wfcs

total cpu time spent up to now is       29.0 secs

per-process dynamical memory:    21.8 Mb

Self-consistent Calculation

iteration #  1     ecut=    45.00 Ry     beta=0.70

Davidson diagonalization with overlap

ethr =  1.00E-02,  avg # of iterations =  2.2

--- enter write_ns ---

LDA+U parameters:

U( 1)     =  4.00000000

alpha( 1) =  0.00000000

atom    1   Tr[ns(na)] =   9.99375

eigenvalues:

0.999  0.999  0.999  1.000  1.000

eigenvectors:

1.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000

0.000  0.296  0.033  0.145  0.526

0.000  0.033  0.296  0.526  0.145

0.000  0.068  0.603  0.258  0.071

0.000  0.603  0.068  0.071  0.258

occupations:

0.999 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000

-0.000  1.000 -0.000  0.000  0.000

-0.000 -0.000  1.000  0.000 -0.000

-0.000  0.000  0.000  0.999  0.000

-0.000  0.000 -0.000  0.000  0.999

atom    2   Tr[ns(na)] =   9.99375

eigenvalues:

0.999  0.999  0.999  1.000  1.000

eigenvectors:

1.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000

0.000  0.218  0.115  0.667  0.000

0.000  0.115  0.218  0.000  0.667

0.000  0.231  0.437  0.000  0.333

0.000  0.437  0.231  0.333  0.000

occupations:

0.999 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000

-0.000  1.000 -0.000  0.000 -0.000

-0.000 -0.000  1.000 -0.000 -0.000

-0.000  0.000 -0.000  0.999  0.000

-0.000 -0.000 -0.000  0.000  0.999

N of occupied +U levels =  19.9875049

--- exit write_ns ---

total cpu time spent up to now is       34.0 secs

total energy              =    -311.96202638 Ry

Harris-Foulkes estimate   =    -312.89328229 Ry

estimated scf accuracy   

iteration #  2     ecut=    45.00 Ry     beta=0.70

Davidson diagonalization with overlap

ethr =  3.37E-03,  avg # of iterations =  3.2

total cpu time spent up to now is       38.9 secs

total energy              =    -312.21161943 Ry

Harris-Foulkes estimate   =    -313.12944003 Ry

estimated scf accuracy   

iteration #  3     ecut=    45.00 Ry     beta=0.70

Davidson diagonalization with overlap

ethr =  3.37E-03,  avg # of iterations =  3.0

total cpu time spent up to now is       51.8 secs

total energy              =    -312.57861633 Ry

Harris-Foulkes estimate   =    -312.57990562 Ry

estimated scf accuracy   

iteration #  4     ecut=    45.00 Ry     beta=0.70

Davidson diagonalization with overlap

ethr =  9.76E-06,  avg # of iterations =  3.6

total cpu time spent up to now is       57.2 secs

total energy              =    -312.57917939 Ry

Harris-Foulkes estimate   =    -312.57945786 Ry

estimated scf accuracy   

iteration #  5     ecut=    45.00 Ry     beta=0.70

Davidson diagonalization with overlap

ethr =  1.91E-06,  avg # of iterations =  2.0

total cpu time spent up to now is       60.9 secs

total energy              =    -312.57921637 Ry

Harris-Foulkes estimate   =    -312.57923000 Ry

estimated scf accuracy   

iteration #  6     ecut=    45.00 Ry     beta=0.70

Davidson diagonalization with overlap

ethr =  1.02E-07,  avg # of iterations =  2.8

total cpu time spent up to now is       65.2 secs

total energy              =    -312.57922451 Ry

Harris-Foulkes estimate   =    -312.57922516 Ry

estimated scf accuracy   

iteration #  7     ecut=    45.00 Ry     beta=0.70

Davidson diagonalization with overlap

ethr =  4.40E-09,  avg # of iterations =  3.0

total cpu time spent up to now is       85.9 secs

total energy              =    -312.57922467 Ry

Harris-Foulkes estimate   =    -312.57922533 Ry

estimated scf accuracy   

iteration #  8     ecut=    45.00 Ry     beta=0.70

Davidson diagonalization with overlap

ethr =  4.40E-09,  avg # of iterations =  2.5

total cpu time spent up to now is       90.2 secs

End of self-consistent calculation

--- enter write_ns ---

LDA+U parameters:

U( 1)     =  4.00000000

alpha( 1) =  0.00000000

atom    1   Tr[ns(na)] =   9.99457

eigenvalues:

0.999  0.999  0.999  1.000  1.000

eigenvectors:

1.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000

0.000  0.291  0.033  0.138  0.538

0.000  0.033  0.291  0.538  0.138

0.000  0.069  0.607  0.258  0.066

0.000  0.607  0.069  0.066  0.258

occupations:

0.999 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000

-0.000  1.000 -0.000  0.000  0.000

-0.000 -0.000  1.000  0.000 -0.000

-0.000  0.000  0.000  0.999  0.000

-0.000  0.000 -0.000  0.000  0.999

atom    2   Tr[ns(na)] =   9.99457

eigenvalues:

0.999  0.999  0.999  1.000  1.000

eigenvectors:

1.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000

0.000  0.214  0.111  0.673  0.003

0.000  0.111  0.214  0.003  0.673

0.000  0.230  0.445  0.001  0.323

0.000  0.445  0.230  0.323  0.001

occupations:

0.999 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000

-0.000  1.000 -0.000  0.000 -0.000

-0.000 -0.000  1.000 -0.000 -0.000

-0.000  0.000 -0.000  0.999  0.000

-0.000 -0.000 -0.000  0.000  0.999

N of occupied +U levels =  19.9891406

--- exit write_ns ---

k = 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 (  2273 PWs)   bands (ev):

-7.3732  -6.7012  -6.6830  -6.6830  -6.6253  -6.6253  -6.4556  -6.4556

-6.3059  -6.3059  -5.5012  -3.0986   2.9317   7.7145   7.7145   8.1880

8.5229   8.5453   8.5453  11.0606  15.1946  17.1656

k = 0.0000 0.0000 0.1545 (  2261 PWs)   bands (ev):

-7.2968  -6.8424  -6.6834  -6.6834  -6.6410  -6.6410  -6.4249  -6.4249

-6.3208  -6.3208  -5.1904  -3.5603   3.6377   6.8119   7.8324   7.8324

8.4202   8.4202   9.7463  11.0565  15.0711  16.6442

k = 0.0000 0.0000-0.3090 (  2232 PWs)   bands (ev):

-7.0949  -7.0941  -6.6697  -6.6697  -6.6694  -6.6694  -6.3655  -6.3655

-6.3654  -6.3654  -4.4460  -4.4448   5.1679   5.1684   8.1222   8.1222

8.1232   8.1232  10.7362  10.7370  15.3032  15.3059

k = 0.0000 0.2887 0.0000 (  2239 PWs)   bands (ev):

-7.4260  -7.0717  -6.6339  -6.6160  -6.5391  -6.5002  -6.4932  -6.4287

-6.3928  -6.2927  -4.5562  -2.7425   3.5096   5.3049   5.9152   6.9778

7.9983   8.1394  10.7783  12.8514  14.3961  15.3742

k = 0.0000 0.2887 0.1545 (  2232 PWs)   bands (ev):

-7.3721  -7.1185  -6.6380  -6.5998  -6.5714  -6.5169  -6.4582  -6.4097

-6.3984  -6.3129  -4.3536  -3.0978   3.8704   5.2443   5.9952   7.1358

7.8518   7.9554  11.0119  12.6997  14.3241  15.1471

k = 0.0000 0.2887-0.3090 (  2234 PWs)   bands (ev):

-7.2431  -7.2425  -6.6152  -6.6150  -6.5591  -6.5589  -6.4208  -6.4207

-6.3616  -6.3615  -3.7961  -3.7950   4.5772   4.5781   6.9760   6.9767

7.5321   7.5333  11.8831  11.8843  14.6551  14.6566

k = 0.0000-0.5774 0.0000 (  2256 PWs)   bands (ev):

-7.4939  -7.3415  -6.6290  -6.6185  -6.5159  -6.4657  -6.3863  -6.3835

-6.3158  -6.2757  -3.2163  -2.6520   3.2819   4.1209   5.2722   6.3573

6.9147   7.7285  12.1377  12.7394  13.6133  14.5958

k = 0.0000-0.5774 0.1545 (  2234 PWs)   bands (ev):

-7.4612  -7.3538  -6.6489  -6.5807  -6.5572  -6.4539  -6.4104  -6.3367

-6.3152  -6.2930  -3.1548  -2.7550   3.1327   3.7326   5.9496   6.5404

7.2695   7.5061  11.5713  12.5582  14.2917  14.4878

k = 0.0000-0.5774-0.3090 (  2252 PWs)   bands (ev):

-7.3969  -7.3964  -6.6415  -6.6414  -6.4908  -6.4906  -6.3592  -6.3591

-6.3107  -6.3106  -2.9765  -2.9758   3.2280   3.2291   7.0032   7.0047

7.0519   7.0521  11.7454  11.7459  14.6830  14.6852

k = 0.2500 0.4330 0.0000 (  2247 PWs)   bands (ev):

-7.4466  -7.3108  -6.6840  -6.5127  -6.5014  -6.4746  -6.4421  -6.4344

-6.3448  -6.3097  -3.3372  -2.4923   3.7952   4.2515   5.3367   5.4586

6.9663   7.0976  12.7954  13.5943  14.3580  14.6997

k = 0.2500 0.4330 0.1545 (  2238 PWs)   bands (ev):

-7.4165  -7.3183  -6.6382  -6.5709  -6.5201  -6.4797  -6.4357  -6.4043

-6.3434  -6.3243  -3.2408  -2.6445   3.6077   4.0148   5.4488   6.1609

6.6530   7.4107  12.6295  13.4633  14.5491  14.6991

k = 0.2500 0.4330-0.3090 (  2232 PWs)   bands (ev):

-7.3564  -7.3559  -6.5788  -6.5788  -6.5297  -6.5295  -6.4321  -6.4320

-6.3247  -6.3246  -2.9708  -2.9701   3.6431   3.6441   5.9635   5.9648

7.2488   7.2491  12.8298  12.8318  14.6667  14.6671

k = 0.0000-0.2887 0.1545 (  2232 PWs)   bands (ev):

-7.3721  -7.1185  -6.6381  -6.5997  -6.5713  -6.5170  -6.4583  -6.4096

-6.3984  -6.3129  -4.3536  -3.0977   3.8704   5.2441   5.9957   7.1358

7.8517   7.9554  11.0116  12.6997  14.3254  15.1460

the Fermi energy is     8.5915 ev

!    total energy              =    -312.57922491 Ry

Harris-Foulkes estimate   =    -312.57922500 Ry

estimated scf accuracy   

The total energy is the sum of the following terms:

one-electron contribution =     -79.18311959 Ry

hartree contribution      =      68.63097517 Ry

xc contribution           =     -94.84178571 Ry

ewald contribution        =    -207.18697592 Ry

Hubbard energy            =       0.00159519 Ry

smearing contrib. (-TS)   =       0.00008596 Ry

convergence has been achieved in   8 iterations

Forces acting on atoms (Ry/au):

atom    1 type  1   force =     0.00000000    0.00000000    0.00047308

atom    2 type  1   force =     0.00000000    0.00000000    0.00021429

atom    3 type  2   force =     0.00000000    0.00000000   -0.00024660

atom    4 type  2   force =     0.00000000   -0.00000000   -0.00044077

Total force =     0.000724     Total SCF correction =     0.000647

SCF correction compared to forces is large: reduce conv_thr to get better values

entering subroutine stress ...

  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论

“相关推荐”对你有帮助么?

  • 非常没帮助
  • 没帮助
  • 一般
  • 有帮助
  • 非常有帮助
提交
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值