hive分析函数row_number()、rank()、dense_rank() 的不同之处

我们先看几组结果,再来分析row_number()、rank()、dense_rank() 的不同之处

spark-sql> with test1 as
         > (select 100024 as apptypeid,10 as pv
         > union all
         > select 100024 as apptypeid,20 as pv
         > union all
         > select 100024 as apptypeid,30 as pv
         > union all
         > select 100027 as apptypeid,20 as pv
         > union all
         > select 100027 as apptypeid,50 as pv
         > union all
         > select 100027 as apptypeid,50 as pv)
         > select 
         >   apptypeid,
         >   pv,
         >   row_number() over(distribute by apptypeid sort by pv desc) as rank
         > from test1;
100024  30      1                                                               
100024	20		2
100024	10		3
100027	50		1
100027	50		2
100027	20		3
Time taken: 2.169 seconds, Fetched 6 row(s)
spark-sql> with test1 as
         > (select 100024 as apptypeid,10 as pv
         > union all
         > select 100024 as apptypeid,20 as pv
         > union all
         > select 100024 as apptypeid,30 as pv
         > union all
         > select 100027 as apptypeid,20 as pv
         > union all
         > select 100027 as apptypeid,50 as pv
         > union all
         > select 100027 as apptypeid,50 as pv)
         > select 
         >   apptypeid,
         >   pv,
         >   rank() over(distribute by apptypeid sort by pv desc) as rank
         > from test1;
100024  30      1                                                               
100024	20		2
100024	10		3
100027	50		1
100027	50		1
100027	20		3
spark-sql> with test1 as
         > (select 100024 as apptypeid,10 as pv
         > union all
         > select 100024 as apptypeid,20 as pv
         > union all
         > select 100024 as apptypeid,30 as pv
         > union all
         > select 100027 as apptypeid,20 as pv
         > union all
         > select 100027 as apptypeid,50 as pv
         > union all
         > select 100027 as apptypeid,50 as pv)
         > select 
         >   apptypeid,
         >   pv,
         >   dense_rank() over(distribute by apptypeid sort by pv desc) as rank
         > from test1;
100024  30      1                                                               
100024	20		2
100024	10		3
100027	50		1
100027	50		1
100027	20		2
Time taken: 3.968 seconds, Fetched 6 row(s)

总结: 从上面几组结果我们可以看出:
1.row_number()如果有两个相同的数据进行排序,相同的数据会随机顺序排序(1、2、3)
2.rank()如果有两个相同的数据进行排序,相同的数据顺序一样,排同样的顺序,而下面的数据排序会跳过上面的计数排序(1、1、3)
3.dense_rank()如果有两个相同的数据进行排序,相同的数据顺序一样,排同样的顺序,下面的数据排序不会跳过计数排序,依然会顺序排序(1、1、2)
4.rank()和dense_rank()的区别是一样跳过计数排序,一个不跳过计数排序

  • 0
    点赞
  • 1
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论

“相关推荐”对你有帮助么?

  • 非常没帮助
  • 没帮助
  • 一般
  • 有帮助
  • 非常有帮助
提交
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值