Aws ec2 mysql vs rds_MySQL 实例迁移至 AWS: RDS vs EC2

题记：当将MySQL实例移动到AWS时，你可能需要选择使用 RDS还是 EC2。 本文将重点介绍一些需要考虑的关键因素，以帮助您确定哪种是服务您的数据的最具成本效益的解决方案。

When moving your MySQL instances to AWS, you would probably have to deal with this decision. This article will highlight some of the key factors that need to be considered in order to help you determine which is the most cost-effective solution for serving your data.

当将MySQL实例移动到AWS时，你可能需要选择使用 RDS还是 EC2。 本文将重点介绍一些需要考虑的关键因素，以帮助您确定哪种是服务您的数据的最具成本效益的解决方案。简介

RDS is based on EC2, so in this post I will focus on the benefits and disadvantages of using the former, versus migrating MySQL into user-managed EC2 instances.

RDS是基于EC2的，因此在本文中，我将重点介绍使用RDS的优缺点，与将MySQL迁移到用户管理的EC2实例做对比。

The value of RDS resides in simplified provisioning and administration. Several of the most common maintenance tasks such as minor version upgrades, backups, and slave creation are automated and can be managed from the AWS console. On the other hand, RDS imposes some limitations to MySQL functionality so it could be offered “as a Service” while delivering a safe and consistent user experience.

RDS的价值在于简化供应和管理。 一些最常见的维护任务(例如小版本升级，备份和从属创建)是自动的，可以从AWS控制台进行管理。 另一方面，RDS对MySQL功能增加了一些限制&#x