java中使用代码证明SimpleDateFormat非线程安全
异常重现
实现代码如下:
public static final SimpleDateFormat dataFormat = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd hh:mm:ss");
public static void main(String[] args) {
ExecutorService executorService = Executors.newCachedThreadPool();
List<String> dateStrList =
Arrays.asList(new String[] {"2019-05-28 10:21:04", "2019-04-28 10:11:01",
"2019-05-25 09:11:01", "2019-05-18 10:16:01", "2018-05-28 10:11:01"});
for (String s : dateStrList) {
executorService.execute(() -> {
try {
Date date = dataFormat.parse(s);
System.out.println(date);
TimeUnit.SECONDS.sleep(1);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
});
}
}
使用ExecutorService 创建线程池,然后使用线程池执行parse代码,结果抛出异常
java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: ""
at java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.java:65)
at java.lang.Long.parseLong(Long.java:601)
at java.lang.Long.parseLong(Long.java:631)
at java.text.DigitList.getLong(DigitList.java:195)
at java.text.DecimalFormat.parse(DecimalFormat.java:2051)
at java.text.SimpleDateFormat.subParse(SimpleDateFormat.java:2162)
at java.text.SimpleDateFormat.parse(SimpleDateFormat.java:1514)
at java.text.DateFormat.parse(DateFormat.java:364)
at com.dxz.property.statics.TestTiger.lambda$0(TestTiger.java:23)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
java.lang.NumberFormatException: multiple points
at sun.misc.FloatingDecimal.readJavaFormatString(FloatingDecimal.java:1890)
at sun.misc.FloatingDecimal.parseDouble(FloatingDecimal.java:110)
at java.lang.Double.parseDouble(Double.java:538)
at java.text.DigitList.getDouble(DigitList.java:169)
at java.text.DecimalFormat.parse(DecimalFormat.java:2056)
at java.text.SimpleDateFormat.subParse(SimpleDateFormat.java:1869)
at java.text.SimpleDateFormat.parse(SimpleDateFormat.java:1514)
at java.text.DateFormat.parse(DateFormat.java:364)
at com.dxz.property.statics.TestTiger.lambda$0(TestTiger.java:23)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
java.lang.NumberFormatException: multiple points
at sun.misc.FloatingDecimal.readJavaFormatString(FloatingDecimal.java:1890)
at sun.misc.FloatingDecimal.parseDouble(FloatingDecimal.java:110)
at java.lang.Double.parseDouble(Double.java:538)
at java.text.DigitList.getDouble(DigitList.java:169)
at java.text.DecimalFormat.parse(DecimalFormat.java:2056)
at java.text.SimpleDateFormat.subParse(SimpleDateFormat.java:1869)
at java.text.SimpleDateFormat.parse(SimpleDateFormat.java:1514)
at java.text.DateFormat.parse(DateFormat.java:364)
at com.dxz.property.statics.TestTiger.lambda$0(TestTiger.java:23)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
Thu May 25 09:11:01 CST 2220
Thu Nov 07 10:16:01 CST 2024
怎么解决该问题
SimpleDateFormat在对时间进行格式化的方法format中,会先对calendar对象进行setTime的赋值,若是有多个线程同时操作一个SimpleDateFormat实例的话,就会对calendar的赋值进行覆盖,进而产生问题。
有三种方法可以解决这个问题:
1.在每次需要使用的时候,进行SimpleDateFormat实例的创建,这种方式会导致创建一些对象实例,占用一些内存,不建议这样使用。
实现代码如下:
public static void main(String[] args) {
ExecutorService executorService = Executors.newCachedThreadPool();
List<String> dateStrList =
Arrays.asList(new String[] {"2019-05-28 10:21:04", "2019-04-28 10:11:01",
"2019-05-25 09:11:01", "2019-05-18 10:16:01", "2018-05-28 10:11:01"});
for (String s : dateStrList) {
executorService.execute(() -> {
try {
SimpleDateFormat dataFormat = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd hh:mm:ss");
Date date = dataFormat.parse(s);
System.out.println(date);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
});
}
}
输出结果如下:
Mon May 28 10:11:01 CST 2018
Sat May 18 10:16:01 CST 2019
Tue May 28 10:21:04 CST 2019
Sat May 25 09:11:01 CST 2019
Sun Apr 28 10:11:01 CST 2019
2.使用同步的方式,在调用方法的时候加上synchronized,这样可以让线程调用方法时,进行加锁,也就是会造成线程间的互斥,对性能影响比较大。
实现代码如下:
public static void main(String[] args) {
ExecutorService executorService = Executors.newCachedThreadPool();
List<String> dateStrList =
Arrays.asList(new String[] {"2019-05-28 10:21:04", "2019-04-28 10:11:01",
"2019-05-25 09:11:01", "2019-05-18 10:16:01", "2018-05-28 10:11:01"});
SimpleDateFormat dataFormat = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd hh:mm:ss");
for (String s : dateStrList) {
executorService.execute(() -> {
try {
synchronized(dataFormat){
Date date = dataFormat.parse(s);
System.out.println(date);
}
TimeUnit.SECONDS.sleep(1);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
});
}
}
输出结果如下:
Sun Apr 28 10:11:01 CST 2019
Sat May 18 10:16:01 CST 2019
Mon May 28 10:11:01 CST 2018
Sat May 25 09:11:01 CST 2019
Tue May 28 10:21:04 CST 2019
3.使用ThreadLocal进行保存,相当于一个线程只会有一个实例,进而减少了实例数量,也防止了线程间的互斥,推荐使用这种方式。
实现代码如下:
public static void main(String[] args) {
ExecutorService executorService = Executors.newCachedThreadPool();
List<String> dateStrList =
Arrays.asList(new String[] {"2019-05-28 10:21:04", "2019-04-28 10:11:01",
"2019-05-25 09:11:01", "2019-05-18 10:16:01", "2018-05-28 10:11:01"});
ThreadLocal<SimpleDateFormat> threadLocal = new ThreadLocal<SimpleDateFormat>() {
@Override
protected SimpleDateFormat initialValue() {
return new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd hh:mm:ss");
}
};
for (String s : dateStrList) {
executorService.execute(() -> {
try {
Date date = threadLocal.get().parse(s);
System.out.println(date);
TimeUnit.SECONDS.sleep(1);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
});
}
}
输出结果如下:
Sat May 18 10:16:01 CST 2019
Tue May 28 10:21:04 CST 2019
Sun Apr 28 10:11:01 CST 2019
Mon May 28 10:11:01 CST 2018
Sat May 25 09:11:01 CST 2019