for-foreach-streamforeach循环比较

@Test
    public void test(){
        ArrayList<Integer> list = new ArrayList<>();

        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
            list.add(i);
        }


        long start1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        for (int i = 0; i < list.size(); i++) {
            doSome();
        }
        long end1 = System.currentTimeMillis();

        System.out.println("for:"+(end1 - start1));

        start1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        for (Integer integer : list) {
            doSome();
        }
        end1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        System.out.println("增强for："+ (end1 - start1));

        start1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        list.forEach(e -> doSome());
        end1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        System.out.println("foreach："+ (end1 - start1));

        start1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        list.stream().forEach(e -> doSome());
        end1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        System.out.println("stream-foreach："+ (end1 - start1));

        start1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        list.parallelStream().forEach(e -> doSome());
        end1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        System.out.println("parallelStream-foreach："+ (end1 - start1));
    }

    private void doSome(){
    }

for:0
增强for：0
foreach：251
stream-foreach：4
parallelStream-foreach：8

循环体内操作不消耗时间时： 简单循环效率更高

private void doSome(){
        try {
            Thread.sleep(100);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
    }

for:10343
增强for：10189
foreach：10268
stream-foreach：10204
parallelStream-foreach：2647
循环体内部执行比较耗时时：流式循环更为省时（内部采用多线程）