mutex和atomic的效率比较

#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <atomic>
#include <thread>
#include <mutex>

using namespace std;

long long a = 0;
atomic<long long> b(0);
long long c = 0;
mutex mt;

void fun1(){
    for(int i = 0; i < 10000; i++){
        a++;
    }
}

void fun2(){
    for(int i = 0; i < 10000; i++){
        b++;
    }
}

void fun3(){
    for(int i = 0; i < 10000; i ++){
        mt.lock();
        c++;
        mt.unlock();
    }
}

int main(){
    vector<thread> save1;
    vector<thread> save2;
    vector<thread> save3;

    clock_t start_time1,end_time1,start_time2,end_time2,start_time3,end_time3;

    cout << "P1 ,GO" <<endl;
    cout << "P2, GO" <<endl;
    cout << "P3, GO" <<endl;

    start_time1 = clock();
    for(int i = 0; i < 10000; i++){
        save1.push_back(thread(fun1));
    }
    for(auto& a: save1){
        a.join();
    }
    end_time1 = clock();

    start_time2 = clock();
    for(int i = 0; i < 10000; i++){
        save2.push_back(thread(fun2));
    }
    for(auto& b: save2){
        b.join();
    }
    end_time2 = clock();

    start_time3 = clock();
    for(int i = 0; i < 10000; i++){
        save3.push_back(thread(fun3));
    }
    for(auto& c: save3){
        c.join();
    }
    end_time3 = clock();

    cout << a << " waste time:"<<end_time1- start_time1<<endl;
    cout << b << " waste time:"<<end_time2- start_time2<<endl;
    cout << c << " waste time:"<<end_time3- start_time3<<endl;

    cout << "Final" << endl;

    return 0;
}

输出结果