问题描述:
最近在完成实验的过程中,我想要将一个字符串数组转换为一个List,从而方便后续对其中元素进行检查,删除掉一部分非法元素。简单上网搜索资料以后,我发现了可以使用Arrays.asList的操作,将一个字符串数组转化为List,示例代码如下:
String[] s = {"aa","bb","cc"};
List<String> strlist = Arrays.asList(s);
但是当我使用这个方法完成代码,进行JUnit测试的时候却不能通过,查看Failure Trace时在这段代码处发现了UnsupportedOperationException的报错:
原因分析:
我们首先查看一下Arrays.asList的源码(按住"Ctrl"键,将鼠标指到"asList"上,即可选择查看其源码):
/**
* Returns a fixed-size list backed by the specified array. (Changes to
* the returned list "write through" to the array.) This method acts
* as bridge between array-based and collection-based APIs, in
* combination with {@link Collection#toArray}. The returned list is
* serializable and implements {@link RandomAccess}.
*
* <p>This method also provides a convenient way to create a fixed-size
* list initialized to contain several elements:
* <pre>
* List<String> stooges = Arrays.asList("Larry", "Moe", "Curly");
* </pre>
*
* @param <T> the class of the objects in the array
* @param a the array by which the list will be backed
* @return a list view of the specified array
*/
@SafeVarargs
@SuppressWarnings("varargs")
public static <T> List<T> asList(T... a) {
return new ArrayList<>(a);
}
可以看到该方法返回的是一个ArrayList,继续查看这个ArrayList的源码,发现它并不是java.util.ArrayList的ArrayList,而是java.util.Arrays内部自己所包含的ArrayList。而这个内部类,继承了AbstractList类,没有重写remove方法:
/**
* @serial include
*/
private static class ArrayList<E> extends AbstractList<E>
implements RandomAccess, java.io.Serializable
{
private static final long serialVersionUID = -2764017481108945198L;
private final E[] a;
ArrayList(E[] array) {
a = Objects.requireNonNull(array);
}
@Override
public int size() {
return a.length;
}
@Override
public Object[] toArray() {
return a.clone();
}
@Override
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public <T> T[] toArray(T[] a) {
int size = size();
if (a.length < size)
return Arrays.copyOf(this.a, size,
(Class<? extends T[]>) a.getClass());
System.arraycopy(this.a, 0, a, 0, size);
if (a.length > size)
a[size] = null;
return a;
}
@Override
public E get(int index) {
return a[index];
}
@Override
public E set(int index, E element) {
E oldValue = a[index];
a[index] = element;
return oldValue;
}
@Override
public int indexOf(Object o) {
E[] a = this.a;
if (o == null) {
for (int i = 0; i < a.length; i++)
if (a[i] == null)
return i;
} else {
for (int i = 0; i < a.length; i++)
if (o.equals(a[i]))
return i;
}
return -1;
}
@Override
public boolean contains(Object o) {
return indexOf(o) != -1;
}
@Override
public Spliterator<E> spliterator() {
return Spliterators.spliterator(a, Spliterator.ORDERED);
}
@Override
public void forEach(Consumer<? super E> action) {
Objects.requireNonNull(action);
for (E e : a) {
action.accept(e);
}
}
@Override
public void replaceAll(UnaryOperator<E> operator) {
Objects.requireNonNull(operator);
E[] a = this.a;
for (int i = 0; i < a.length; i++) {
a[i] = operator.apply(a[i]);
}
}
@Override
public void sort(Comparator<? super E> c) {
Arrays.sort(a, c);
}
}
再继续查看一下AbstractList类的源码,我们会发现它的remove方法被直接定义为了“throw new UnsupportedOperationException();”:
/**
* {@inheritDoc}
*
* <p>This implementation always throws an
* {@code UnsupportedOperationException}.
*
* @throws UnsupportedOperationException {@inheritDoc}
* @throws IndexOutOfBoundsException {@inheritDoc}
*/
public E remove(int index) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
到这里就完美破案了,进行Arrays.asList的操作得到的是一个java.util.Arrays内部自己所包含的ArrayList,而它的remove方法继承的是AbstractList类中的remove方法,当我们试图对Arrays.asList的结果进行remove操作时,就会抛出UnsupportedOperationException。
解决方案:
新建一个java.util.ArrayList的ArrayList:
List<String> inputword = Arrays.asList(input.split(" "));
List<String> inputwords = new ArrayList<>();
inputwords.addAll(inputword);