Communication between Processes in Python

最新推荐文章于 2024-04-25 19:10:58 发布

yxc135

最新推荐文章于 2024-04-25 19:10:58 发布

阅读量1.1k

点赞数

分类专栏： Python 文章标签： Process Communication Python

Python 专栏收录该内容

10 篇文章 0 订阅

订阅专栏

Reprint:http://pymotw.com/2/multiprocessing/communication.html

As with threads, a common use pattern for multiple processes is to divide a job up among several workers to run in parallel. Effective use of multiple processes usually requires some communication between them, so that work can be divided and results can be aggregated.

Passing Messages to Processes

A simple way to communicate between process with multiprocessing is to use a Queue to pass messages back and forth. Any pickle-able object can pass through aQueue.

 
   import multiprocessing

class MyFancyClass(object):
    
    def __init__(self, name):
        self.name = name
    
    def do_something(self):
        proc_name = multiprocessing.current_process().name
        print 'Doing something fancy in %s for %s!' % (proc_name, self.name)

def worker(q):
    obj = q.get()
    obj.do_something()

if __name__ == '__main__':
    queue = multiprocessing.Queue()

    p = multiprocessing.Process(target=worker, args=(queue,))
    p.start()
    
    queue.put(MyFancyClass('Fancy Dan'))
    
    # Wait for the worker to finish
    queue.close()
    queue.join_thread()
    p.join()

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

关于最后的两个函数：

Queue.close()
Indicate that no more data will be put on this queue by the current process. The background thread will quit once it has flushed all buffered data to the pipe. This is called automatically when the queue is garbage collected.
Queue.join_thread()
Join the background thread. This can only be used after close() has been called. It blocks until the background thread exits, ensuring that all data in the buffer has been flushed to the pipe.
By default if a process is not the creator of the queue then on exit it will attempt to join the queue’s background thread. The process can call cancel_join_thread() to make join_thread() do nothing.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This short example only passes a single message to a single worker, then the main process waits for the worker to finish.

$ python multiprocessing_queue.py

Doing something fancy in Process-1 for Fancy Dan!

A more complex example shows how to manage several workers consuming data from a JoinableQueue and passing results back to the parent process. The poison pill technique is used to stop the workers. After setting up the real tasks, the main program adds one “stop” value per worker to the job queue. When a worker encounters the special value, it breaks out of its processing loop. The main process uses the task queue’s join() method to wait for all of the tasks to finish before processin the results.

 
   import multiprocessing
import time

class Consumer(multiprocessing.Process):
    
    def __init__(self, task_queue, result_queue):
        multiprocessing.Process.__init__(self)
        self.task_queue = task_queue
        self.result_queue = result_queue

    def run(self):
        proc_name = self.name
        while True:
            next_task = self.task_queue.get()
            if next_task is None:
                # Poison pill means shutdown
                print '%s: Exiting' % proc_name
                self.task_queue.task_done()
                break
            print '%s: %s' % (proc_name, next_task)
            answer = next_task()
            self.task_queue.task_done()
            self.result_queue.put(answer)
        return


class Task(object):
    def __init__(self, a, b):
        self.a = a
        self.b = b
    def __call__(self):
        time.sleep(0.1) # pretend to take some time to do the work
        return '%s * %s = %s' % (self.a, self.b, self.a * self.b)
    def __str__(self):
        return '%s * %s' % (self.a, self.b)


if __name__ == '__main__':
    # Establish communication queues
    tasks = multiprocessing.JoinableQueue()
    results = multiprocessing.Queue()
    
    # Start consumers
    num_consumers = multiprocessing.cpu_count() * 2
    print 'Creating %d consumers' % num_consumers
    consumers = [ Consumer(tasks, results)
                  for i in xrange(num_consumers) ]
    for w in consumers:
        w.start()
    
    # Enqueue jobs
    num_jobs = 10
    for i in xrange(num_jobs):
        tasks.put(Task(i, i))
    
    # Add a poison pill for each consumer
    for i in xrange(num_consumers):
        tasks.put(None)

    # Wait for all of the tasks to finish
    tasks.join()
    
    # Start printing results
    while num_jobs:
        result = results.get()
        print 'Result:', result
        num_jobs -= 1
 
  

Although the jobs enter the queue in order, since their execution is parallelized there is no guarantee about the order they will be completed.

$ python -u multiprocessing_producer_consumer.py

Creating 16 consumers
Consumer-1: 0 * 0
Consumer-2: 1 * 1
Consumer-3: 2 * 2
Consumer-4: 3 * 3
Consumer-5: 4 * 4
Consumer-6: 5 * 5
Consumer-7: 6 * 6
Consumer-8: 7 * 7
Consumer-9: 8 * 8
Consumer-10: 9 * 9
Consumer-11: Exiting
Consumer-12: Exiting
Consumer-13: Exiting
Consumer-14: Exiting
Consumer-15: Exiting
Consumer-16: Exiting
Consumer-1: Exiting
Consumer-4: Exiting
Consumer-5: Exiting
Consumer-6: Exiting
Consumer-2: Exiting
Consumer-3: Exiting
Consumer-9: Exiting
Consumer-7: Exiting
Consumer-8: Exiting
Consumer-10: Exiting
Result: 0 * 0 = 0
Result: 3 * 3 = 9
Result: 8 * 8 = 64
Result: 5 * 5 = 25
Result: 4 * 4 = 16
Result: 6 * 6 = 36
Result: 7 * 7 = 49
Result: 1 * 1 = 1
Result: 2 * 2 = 4
Result: 9 * 9 = 81

Signaling between Processes

The Event class provides a simple way to communicate state information between processes. An event can be toggled between set and unset states. Users of the event object can wait for it to change from unset to set, using an optional timeout value.

 
   import multiprocessing
import time

def wait_for_event(e):
    """Wait for the event to be set before doing anything"""
    print 'wait_for_event: starting'
    e.wait()
    print 'wait_for_event: e.is_set()->', e.is_set()

def wait_for_event_timeout(e, t):
    """Wait t seconds and then timeout"""
    print 'wait_for_event_timeout: starting'
    e.wait(t)
    print 'wait_for_event_timeout: e.is_set()->', e.is_set()


if __name__ == '__main__':
    e = multiprocessing.Event()
    w1 = multiprocessing.Process(name='block', 
                                 target=wait_for_event,
                                 args=(e,))
    w1.start()

    w2 = multiprocessing.Process(name='non-block', 
                                 target=wait_for_event_timeout, 
                                 args=(e, 2))
    w2.start()

    print 'main: waiting before calling Event.set()'
    time.sleep(3)
    e.set()
    print 'main: event is set'
 
  

When wait() times out it returns without an error. The caller is responsible for checking the state of the event using is_set().

$ python -u multiprocessing_event.py

main: waiting before calling Event.set()
wait_for_event: starting
wait_for_event_timeout: starting
wait_for_event_timeout: e.is_set()-> False
main: event is set
wait_for_event: e.is_set()-> True

Controlling Access to Resources

In situations when a single resource needs to be shared between multiple processes, a Lock can be used to avoid conflicting accesses.

 
   import multiprocessing
import sys

def worker_with(lock, stream):
    with lock:
        stream.write('Lock acquired via with\n')
        
def worker_no_with(lock, stream):
    lock.acquire()
    try:
        stream.write('Lock acquired directly\n')
    finally:
        lock.release()

lock = multiprocessing.Lock()
w = multiprocessing.Process(target=worker_with, args=(lock, sys.stdout))
nw = multiprocessing.Process(target=worker_no_with, args=(lock, sys.stdout))

w.start()
nw.start()

w.join()
nw.join()
 
  

In this example, the messages printed to the console may be jumbled together if the two processes do not synchronize their access of the output stream with the lock.

$ python multiprocessing_lock.py

Lock acquired via with
Lock acquired directly

Synchronizing Operations

Condition objects can be used to synchronize parts of a workflow so that some run in parallel but others run sequentially, even if they are in separate processes.

 
   import multiprocessing
import time

def stage_1(cond):
    """perform first stage of work, then notify stage_2 to continue"""
    name = multiprocessing.current_process().name
    print 'Starting', name
    with cond:
        print '%s done and ready for stage 2' % name
        cond.notify_all()

def stage_2(cond):
    """wait for the condition telling us stage_1 is done"""
    name = multiprocessing.current_process().name
    print 'Starting', name
    with cond:
        cond.wait()
        print '%s running' % name

if __name__ == '__main__':
    condition = multiprocessing.Condition()
    s1 = multiprocessing.Process(name='s1', target=stage_1, args=(condition,))
    s2_clients = [
        multiprocessing.Process(name='stage_2[%d]' % i, target=stage_2, args=(condition,))
        for i in range(1, 3)
        ]

    for c in s2_clients:
        c.start()
        time.sleep(1)
    s1.start()

    s1.join()
    for c in s2_clients:
        c.join()
 
  

In this example, two process run the second stage of a job in parallel, but only after the first stage is done.

$ python multiprocessing_condition.py

Starting s1
s1 done and ready for stage 2
Starting stage_2[1]
stage_2[1] running
Starting stage_2[2]
stage_2[2] running

Controlling Concurrent Access to Resources

Sometimes it is useful to allow more than one worker access to a resource at a time, while still limiting the overall number. For example, a connection pool might support a fixed number of simultaneous connections, or a network application might support a fixed number of concurrent downloads. A Semaphore is one way to manage those connections.

 
   import random
import multiprocessing
import time

class ActivePool(object):
    def __init__(self):
        super(ActivePool, self).__init__()
        self.mgr = multiprocessing.Manager()
        self.active = self.mgr.list()
        self.lock = multiprocessing.Lock()
    def makeActive(self, name):
        with self.lock:
            self.active.append(name)
    def makeInactive(self, name):
        with self.lock:
            self.active.remove(name)
    def __str__(self):
        with self.lock:
            return str(self.active)

def worker(s, pool):
    name = multiprocessing.current_process().name
    with s:
        pool.makeActive(name)
        print 'Now running: %s' % str(pool)
        time.sleep(random.random())
        pool.makeInactive(name)

if __name__ == '__main__':
    pool = ActivePool()
    s = multiprocessing.Semaphore(3)
    jobs = [
        multiprocessing.Process(target=worker, name=str(i), args=(s, pool))
        for i in range(10)
        ]

    for j in jobs:
        j.start()

    for j in jobs:
        j.join()
        print 'Now running: %s' % str(pool)
 
  

In this example, the ActivePool class simply serves as a convenient way to track which processes are running at a given moment. A real resource pool would probably allocate a connection or some other value to the newly active process, and reclaim the value when the task is done. Here, the pool is just used to hold the names of the active processes to show that only three are running concurrently.

$ python multiprocessing_semaphore.py

Now running: ['0', '1', '2']
Now running: ['0', '1', '2']
Now running: ['0', '1', '2']
Now running: ['0', '1', '3']
Now running: ['4', '5', '6']
Now running: ['3', '4', '5']
Now running: ['1', '3', '4']
Now running: ['4', '7', '8']
Now running: ['4', '5', '7']
Now running: ['7', '8', '9']
Now running: ['1', '3', '4']
Now running: ['3', '4', '5']
Now running: ['3', '4', '5']
Now running: ['4', '5', '6']
Now running: ['7', '8', '9']
Now running: ['7', '8', '9']
Now running: ['7', '8', '9']
Now running: ['9']
Now running: ['9']
Now running: []

Managing Shared State

In the previous example, the list of active processes is maintained centrally in the ActivePool instance via a special type of list object created by a Manager. TheManager is responsible for coordinating shared information state between all of its users.

 
   import multiprocessing

def worker(d, key, value):
    d[key] = value

if __name__ == '__main__':
    mgr = multiprocessing.Manager()
    d = mgr.dict()
    jobs = [ multiprocessing.Process(target=worker, args=(d, i, i*2))
             for i in range(10) 
             ]
    for j in jobs:
        j.start()
    for j in jobs:
        j.join()
    print 'Results:', d
 
  

By creating the list through the manager, it is shared and updates are seen in all processes. Dictionaries are also supported.

$ python multiprocessing_manager_dict.py

Results: {0: 0, 1: 2, 2: 4, 3: 6, 4: 8, 5: 10, 6: 12, 7: 14, 8: 16, 9: 18}

Shared Namespaces

In addition to dictionaries and lists, a Manager can create a shared Namespace.

 
   import multiprocessing

def producer(ns, event):
    ns.value = 'This is the value'
    event.set()

def consumer(ns, event):
    try:
        value = ns.value
    except Exception, err:
        print 'Before event, consumer got:', str(err)
    event.wait()
    print 'After event, consumer got:', ns.value

if __name__ == '__main__':
    mgr = multiprocessing.Manager()
    namespace = mgr.Namespace()
    event = multiprocessing.Event()
    p = multiprocessing.Process(target=producer, args=(namespace, event))
    c = multiprocessing.Process(target=consumer, args=(namespace, event))
    
    c.start()
    p.start()
    
    c.join()
    p.join()
 
  

Any named value added to the Namespace is visible to all of the clients that receive the Namespace instance.

$ python multiprocessing_namespaces.py

Before event, consumer got: 'Namespace' object has no attribute 'value'
After event, consumer got: This is the value

It is important to know that updates to the contents of mutable values in the namespace are not propagated automatically.

 
   import multiprocessing

def producer(ns, event):
    ns.my_list.append('This is the value') # DOES NOT UPDATE GLOBAL VALUE!
    event.set()

def consumer(ns, event):
    print 'Before event, consumer got:', ns.my_list
    event.wait()
    print 'After event, consumer got:', ns.my_list

if __name__ == '__main__':
    mgr = multiprocessing.Manager()
    namespace = mgr.Namespace()
    namespace.my_list = []
    
    event = multiprocessing.Event()
    p = multiprocessing.Process(target=producer, args=(namespace, event))
    c = multiprocessing.Process(target=consumer, args=(namespace, event))
    
    c.start()
    p.start()
    
    c.join()
    p.join()
 
  

To update the list, attach it to the namespace object again.

$ python multiprocessing_namespaces_mutable.py

Before event, consumer got: []
After event, consumer got: []

Process Pools

The Pool class can be used to manage a fixed number of workers for simple cases where the work to be done can be broken up and distributed between workers independently. The return values from the jobs are collected and returned as a list. The pool arguments include the number of processes and a function to run when starting the task process (invoked once per child).

 
   import multiprocessing

def do_calculation(data):
    return data * 2

def start_process():
    print 'Starting', multiprocessing.current_process().name

if __name__ == '__main__':
    inputs = list(range(10))
    print 'Input   :', inputs
    
    builtin_outputs = map(do_calculation, inputs)
    print 'Built-in:', builtin_outputs
    
    pool_size = multiprocessing.cpu_count() * 2
    pool = multiprocessing.Pool(processes=pool_size,
                                initializer=start_process,
                                )
    pool_outputs = pool.map(do_calculation, inputs)
    pool.close() # no more tasks
    pool.join()  # wrap up current tasks

    print 'Pool    :', pool_outputs
 
  

The result of the map() method is functionally equivalent to the built-in map(), except that individual tasks run in parallel. Since the pool is processing its inputs in parallel, close() and join() can be used to synchronize the main process with the task processes to ensure proper cleanup.

$ python multiprocessing_pool.py

Input   : [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
Built-in: [0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18]
Starting PoolWorker-11
Starting PoolWorker-12
Starting PoolWorker-13
Starting PoolWorker-14
Starting PoolWorker-15
Starting PoolWorker-16
Starting PoolWorker-1
Starting PoolWorker-2
Starting PoolWorker-3
Starting PoolWorker-4
Starting PoolWorker-5
Starting PoolWorker-8
Starting PoolWorker-9
Starting PoolWorker-6
Starting PoolWorker-10
Starting PoolWorker-7
Pool    : [0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18]

By default Pool creates a fixed number of worker processes and passes jobs to them until there are no more jobs. Setting the maxtasksperchild parameter tells the pool to restart a worker process after it has finished a few tasks. This can be used to avoid having long-running workers consume ever more system resources.

 
   import multiprocessing

def do_calculation(data):
    return data * 2

def start_process():
    print 'Starting', multiprocessing.current_process().name

if __name__ == '__main__':
    inputs = list(range(10))
    print 'Input   :', inputs
    
    builtin_outputs = map(do_calculation, inputs)
    print 'Built-in:', builtin_outputs
    
    pool_size = multiprocessing.cpu_count() * 2
    pool = multiprocessing.Pool(processes=pool_size,
                                initializer=start_process,
                                maxtasksperchild=2,
                                )
    pool_outputs = pool.map(do_calculation, inputs)
    pool.close() # no more tasks
    pool.join()  # wrap up current tasks
    
    print 'Pool    :', pool_outputs
 
  

The pool restarts the workers when they have completed their allotted tasks, even if there is no more work. In this output, eight workers are created, even though there are only 10 tasks, and each worker can complete two of them at a time.

$ python multiprocessing_pool_maxtasksperchild.py

Input   : [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
Built-in: [0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18]
Starting PoolWorker-11
Starting PoolWorker-12
Starting PoolWorker-13
Starting PoolWorker-14
Starting PoolWorker-15
Starting PoolWorker-16
Starting PoolWorker-1
Starting PoolWorker-2
Starting PoolWorker-3
Starting PoolWorker-4
Starting PoolWorker-5
Starting PoolWorker-6
Starting PoolWorker-7
Starting PoolWorker-8
Starting PoolWorker-9
Starting PoolWorker-10
Pool    : [0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18]