本人转载:http://www.cnblogs.com/cuitsl/archive/2012/01/06/2314636.html
与反射的比较
首先能看到的是,dynamic与反射相比,执行相同操作所需的代码少的多。
如调用类Me中的GetName()方法。
class
Me
{
public string Blog { get ; set ; }
public string GetName()
{
return " Zhenxing Zhou " ;
}
}
{
public string Blog { get ; set ; }
public string GetName()
{
return " Zhenxing Zhou " ;
}
}
用反射调用GetName()方法:
Assembly a
=
Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly();
object instance = a.CreateInstance( " Xianfen.Net.TestDynamic.Me " );
Type type = instance.GetType();
MethodInfo mi = type.GetMethod( " GetName " );
object result = mi.Invoke(instance, null );
object instance = a.CreateInstance( " Xianfen.Net.TestDynamic.Me " );
Type type = instance.GetType();
MethodInfo mi = type.GetMethod( " GetName " );
object result = mi.Invoke(instance, null );
同样的dynamic调用:
dynamic myInfo
=
new
Me();
string result = myInfo.GetName();
string result = myInfo.GetName();
下面先举一个不用dynamic来实现反射的例子
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { DynamicSample dynamicSample = new DynamicSample(); //通过反射得到DynamicSample的方法 var add = dynamicSample.GetType().GetMethod("Add"); Stopwatch watch = new Stopwatch(); watch.Start(); for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++) { int re = (int)add.Invoke(dynamicSample, new object[] { 1, 2 }); } watch.Stop(); Console.WriteLine(watch.ElapsedMilliseconds);//200毫秒左右 Console.Read(); } } public class DynamicSample { public string Name { get; set; } public int Add(int a, int b) { return a + b; } }
试过几次,耗时基本在200毫秒左右,然后我们用dynamic来实现反射,看看性能如何
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { dynamic dynamicSample = new DynamicSample(); Stopwatch watch = new Stopwatch(); watch.Start(); for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++) { int re = dynamicSample.Add(1, 2); } watch.Stop(); Console.WriteLine(watch.ElapsedMilliseconds);//50毫秒左右 Console.Read(); } } public class DynamicSample { public string Name { get; set; } public int Add(int a, int b) { return a + b; } }
不仅代码变少了, 而且性能也提高了一个数量级,所有,大家能用动态属性实现反射的情况下建议都用动态属性来试下!