[size=large]python3.0一个有趣的细节
2009-02-24 01:59:37
看文档时看到的
# Python v3.0c1 documentation »
Optimizations
The net result of the 3.0 generalizations is that Python 3.0 runs the pystone benchmark around 33% slower than Python 2.5. There’s room for improvement; we expect to be optimizing string and integer operations significantly before the final 3.0 release!
# Python v3.0.1 documentation »
Performance
The net result of the 3.0 generalizations is that Python 3.0 runs the pystone benchmark around 10% slower than Python 2.5. Most likely the biggest cause is the removal of special-casing for small integers. There’s room for improvement, but it will happen after 3.0 is released!
恩 好好优化 应该还是有不少提升空间的
我想起了别人blog上的一句话^_^
http://blog.codingnow.com/2005/12/compare_with_lua_5.html
"读完这篇 paper 感觉很多地方 lua 都是鄙视 python 的低效 :)"[/size]
2009-02-24 01:59:37
看文档时看到的
# Python v3.0c1 documentation »
Optimizations
The net result of the 3.0 generalizations is that Python 3.0 runs the pystone benchmark around 33% slower than Python 2.5. There’s room for improvement; we expect to be optimizing string and integer operations significantly before the final 3.0 release!
# Python v3.0.1 documentation »
Performance
The net result of the 3.0 generalizations is that Python 3.0 runs the pystone benchmark around 10% slower than Python 2.5. Most likely the biggest cause is the removal of special-casing for small integers. There’s room for improvement, but it will happen after 3.0 is released!
恩 好好优化 应该还是有不少提升空间的
我想起了别人blog上的一句话^_^
http://blog.codingnow.com/2005/12/compare_with_lua_5.html
"读完这篇 paper 感觉很多地方 lua 都是鄙视 python 的低效 :)"[/size]
414
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
