文章记单词 | 第76篇（六级）

一，单词释义

1. honour /ˈɑːnər/ n. 荣誉；尊敬 / v. 尊敬；给… 以荣誉
2. deteriorate /dɪˈtɪriəreɪt/ v. 恶化；变坏
3. trait /treɪt/ n. 特征；特性；品质
4. stake /steɪk/ n. 桩；股份；风险 / v. 以… 打赌；资助
5. milk /mɪlk/ n. 牛奶；乳 / v. 挤奶；榨取
6. budget /ˈbʌdʒɪt/ n. 预算 / v. 编制预算 / adj. 低廉的
7. dispose /dɪˈspoʊz/ v. 处理；布置；使倾向于
8. magazine /ˌmæɡəˈziːn/ n. 杂志；期刊；弹药库
9. excess /ɪkˈses/ n. 过量；过剩 / adj. 额外的；过量的
10. well /wel/ n. 井；源泉 / adv. 很好地；充分地 / adj. 健康的 / int. 嗯；好吧
11. wide /waɪd/ adj. 宽的；广泛的 / adv. 充分地；广阔地
12. gentleman /ˈdʒentlmən/ n. 绅士；先生
13. territory /ˈterətɔːri/ n. 领土；领域；地盘
14. enough /ɪˈnʌf/ adv. 足够地 / adj. 足够的 / n. 充足
15. mislead /ˌmɪsˈliːd/ v. 误导；使误解
16. record /ˈrekərd/（名词）n. 记录；唱片；档案 //rɪˈkɔːrd/（动词）v. 记录；录制
17. classify /ˈklæsɪfaɪ/ v. 分类；归类；划分
18. measure /ˈmeʒər/ n. 措施；尺寸 / v. 测量；估量
19. arrange /əˈreɪndʒ/ v. 安排；整理；布置
20. timely /ˈtaɪmli/ adj. 及时的；适时的 / adv. 及时地
21. genius /ˈdʒiːniəs/ n. 天才；天赋；天资
22. defeat /dɪˈfiːt/ v. 击败；挫败 / n. 失败；战败
23. logic /ˈlɑːdʒɪk/ n. 逻辑；逻辑学；推理方法
24. assign /əˈsaɪn/ v. 分配；指派；指定
25. torch /tɔːrtʃ/ n. 火炬；手电筒 / v. 用火炬点燃
26. rapid /ˈræpɪd/ adj. 迅速的；快速的 / n. 急流
27. walk /wɔːk/ v. 走；散步 / n. 步行；散步；步行路程
28. reply /rɪˈplaɪ/ v./n. 回答；答复
29. rug /rʌɡ/ n. 小地毯；厚毛巾
30. qualitative /ˈkwɑːlɪtətɪv/ adj. 定性的；质量的；性质的
31. insult /ɪnˈsʌlt/（动词）v. 侮辱；冒犯 //ˈɪnsʌlt/（名词）n. 侮辱；冒犯
32. adequate /ˈædɪkwət/ adj. 足够的；适当的；胜任的
33. authoritative /əˈθɔːrətətɪv/ adj. 权威的；可信的；专断的
34. treat /triːt/ v. 对待；治疗；款待 / n. 款待；乐事
35. infectious /ɪnˈfekʃəs/ adj. 传染性的；有感染力的
36. divert /daɪˈvɜːrt/ v. 使转向；转移；使娱乐
37. royalty /ˈrɔɪəlti/ n. 皇室；王权；版税
38. divide /dɪˈvaɪd/ v. 划分；分开；除 / n. 分歧；分水岭
39. flap /flæp/ v. 拍打；飘动 / n. 拍打；片状物；慌乱
40. author /ˈɔːθər/ n. 作者；创始人
41. distant /ˈdɪstənt/ adj. 遥远的；冷淡的；远亲的
42. situation /ˌsɪtʃuˈeɪʃən/ n. 情况；形势；处境
43. imitation /ˌɪmɪˈteɪʃən/ n. 模仿；仿制品 / adj. 仿制的
44. together /təˈɡeðər/ adv. 一起；同时；总共
45. listener /ˈlɪsənər/ n. 听众；倾听者

二，文章（逐句翻译）

The Gentleman's Dilemma

绅士的困境

A well-known authoritative author and true gentleman, faced with a tight budget, was assigned to write an article for a famous magazine about the rapid deterioration of cultural traits in a wide, distant territory.

一位知名的权威作家兼真正的绅士，面临预算紧张的情况，被指派为一本著名杂志撰写一篇关于广阔遥远地域中文化特征迅速恶化的文章。

With time not enough and resources limited, he had to arrange his thoughts timely while walking through his cluttered study, where he aimed to dispose of excess items—a torch on the rug, an old record, and even a half-empty glass of milk—to clear mental space.

由于时间不够且资源有限，他不得不一边在杂乱的书房里踱步，一边及时整理思路。他打算处理掉多余的物品——地毯上的一支火炬、一张旧唱片，甚至一杯喝了一半的牛奶——以清空思绪。

He knew the stakes were high: any misinformation could mislead readers, a potential insult to his craft.

他深知风险极高：任何错误信息都可能误导读者，这对他的职业而言可能是一种侮辱。

As he classified ideas logically, he sought adequate evidence, balancing qualitative insights with hard facts.

当他逻辑地分类想法时，他寻找充分的证据，在定性见解和确凿事实之间取得平衡。

His reply to the deteriorating situation was to treat it like a detective’s case, measuring each detail to avoid imitation and ensure authenticity.

他对日益恶化的局势的回应是将其视为一个侦探案件，衡量每个细节以避免模仿并确保真实性。

A genius for narrative, he diverted focus to overlooked truths, dividing myths from reality.

作为叙事天才，他将焦点转移到被忽视的真相上，将神话与现实区分开来。

His work, far from a flap of panic, became an infectious call to action, uniting listeners and readers together.

他的作品绝非慌乱之举，而是成为了一种有感染力的行动号召，将听众和读者凝聚在一起。

By defending the honour of true art, he defeated despair, proving even in fragmented times, culture’s royalty—its enduring stories—can still light the way.

通过捍卫真正艺术的荣誉，他战胜了绝望，证明即使在支离破碎的时代，文化的至尊地位——其不朽的故事——仍能照亮前路。

三，文章（无翻译）

The Gentleman's Dilemma

A well-known authoritative author and true gentleman, faced with a tight budget, was assigned to write an article for a famous magazine about the rapid deterioration of cultural traits in a wide, distant territory. With time not enough and resources limited, he had to arrange his thoughts timely while walking through his cluttered study, where he aimed to dispose of excess items—a torch on the rug, an old record, and even a half-empty glass of milk—to clear mental space.

He knew the stakes were high: any misinformation could mislead readers, a potential insult to his craft. As he classified ideas logically, he sought adequate evidence, balancing qualitative insights with hard facts. His reply to the deteriorating situation was to treat it like a detective’s case, measuring each detail to avoid imitation and ensure authenticity. A genius for narrative, he diverted focus to overlooked truths, dividing myths from reality.

His work, far from a flap of panic, became an infectious call to action, uniting listeners and readers together. By defending the honour of true art, he defeated despair, proving even in fragmented times, culture’s royalty—its enduring stories—can still light the way.