<pre name="code" class="cpp"><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:18px;"> 在图像处理领域,我们经常需要遍历一幅图像,opencv提供多种方法完成对图像的遍历,但是他们的效率是不同的。程序中我们常使用指针或者迭代器的方法遍历图像,下面的程序将对两种方法的效率做对比。</span>
条件:单线程,主频3.4GHz计算机运行,图像image.jpg尺寸为768×576。
// readImage.cpp : 定义控制台应用程序的入口点。
//
#include "stdafx.h"
#include <opencv2/core/core.hpp>
#include <opencv2/highgui/highgui.hpp>
#include <iostream>
using namespace cv;
using namespace std;
int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[])
{
Mat image = imread("image.jpg",0);
Mat gray1 = Mat::zeros(image.rows,image.cols,image.type());
Mat gray2 = Mat::zeros(image.rows,image.cols,image.type());
long int count = 0;
uchar num = 0;
double t = (double)getTickCount();
for (int i = 0; i < image.rows; i++)
{
uchar* ptr = image.ptr<uchar>(i);
uchar* g_ptr = gray1.ptr<uchar>(i);
for (int j = 0; j < image.cols; j++)
{
g_ptr[j] = ptr[j];
}
}
t = ((double)getTickCount() - t)/getTickFrequency();
double t1 = (double)getTickCount();
for (int i=0;i<image.rows;i++)
{
for (int j=0;j<image.cols;j++)
{
gray1.at<uchar>(i,j) = image.at<uchar>(i,j);
}
}
t1 = ((double)getTickCount() - t1)/getTickFrequency();
double t2 = (double)getTickCount();
for (int i = 0; i < image.rows; i++)
{
uchar* ptr = image.ptr<uchar>(i);
for (int j = 0; j < image.cols; j++)
{
num = ptr[j];
}
}
t2 = ((double)getTickCount() - t2)/getTickFrequency();
double t3 = (double)getTickCount();
for (int i=0;i<image.rows;i++)
{
for (int j=0;j<image.cols;j++)
{
num = image.at<uchar>(i,j);
}
}
t3 = ((double)getTickCount() - t3)/getTickFrequency();
cout << t <<endl;
cout << t1 << endl;
cout << t2 << endl;
cout << t3 << endl;
getchar();
return 0;
}
从图中的时间可以看出,对于这个尺寸的图像遍历,使用指针的方法要比使用迭代器的方法快了30倍,使用迭代器只需要1毫秒,而是用迭代器则需要30ms左右。