城市研究SCI杂志论文概览_第4期

本次给大家整理的是《Landscape and Urban Planning》杂志2024年6月第246期的论文的题目和摘要，一共包括8篇SCI论文！

【论文1】

Conservation and development of the historic garden in a landscape context: A systematic literature review

在景观背景下的历史园林的保护与开发：系统性文献综述

【摘要】

Although there have been numerous studies on the heritage attributes, characteristics, and values of the historic garden as a special category of cultural heritage, the question is why a comprehensive review combining mainstream historic garden conservation with ways of understanding the garden in a landscape context has not been conducted. Landscape is an integrative concept that combines physical features and the diversity of functions with social and ecological processes throughout the scales of time and space. Therefore, this landscape context means applying the landscape approach to explore the organic connection between the scale of evolution and the architectonic elements in relation to each other. To elaborate, instead of viewing the garden as an object in one specific temporal-spatial frame, such an approach focuses on the evolution of the site in order to identify persistent structures and other values. The method used in this study involved paper coding as qualitative analysis combined with bibliometric visualization software. We reviewed 162 studies to explore the interconnections between the historic garden and landscape approach. The result is that there are three correspondences between landscape approaches and different stages of the historic garden’s conservation and development: studies identifying the historic garden’s characteristics using landscape mapping, studies demonstrating historic gardens’ conservation based on landscape planning, and studies exploring the potential of development and reuse through landscape design. Finally, we discuss the research gaps and outline an action framework for the conservation and development of heritage gardens in a landscape context.

【摘要翻译】

尽管对历史园林作为特殊文化遗产类别的遗产属性、特征和价值已有众多研究，但仍未进行一项结合主流历史园林保护与在景观语境下理解园林的方式的综合性审查的原因是什么？景观是一个整合性概念，它结合了物理特征与功能多样性，并贯穿时间和空间尺度的社会与生态过程。因此，这种景观语境意味着应用景观方法来探索演变尺度与建筑元素之间的有机联系。更进一步来说，这种方法不是将园林视为某一特定时空框架中的对象，而是关注场地的演变，以识别持续存在的结构和其他价值。本研究中使用的方法包括作为定性分析的纸质编码与文献计量可视化软件相结合。我们回顾了162项研究，以探索历史园林与景观方法之间的相互联系。结果显示，景观方法与历史园林保护和发展的不同阶段之间存在三种对应关系：使用景观绘图识别历史园林特征的研究，基于景观规划展示历史园林保护的研究，以及通过景观设计探索发展和再利用潜力的研究。最后，我们讨论了研究空白并概述了一个行动框架，用于在景观语境中保护和发展遗产园林。

【作者以及邮箱】

Jingsen Lian 荷兰代尔夫特理工大学 J.s.Lian@tudelft.nl

Steffen Nijhuis 荷兰代尔夫特理工大学 S.Nijhuis@tudelft.nl

Gregory Bracken 荷兰代尔夫特理工大学 G.Bracken@tudelft.nl

Xiangyan Wu 中国中央美术学院 wuxiangyan00@126.com

Xiaomin Wu 中国中央美术学院 1092340050@qq.com

Dong Chen 中国中央美术学院 15832421504@163.com

【论文2】

Legacies of redlining lead to unequal cooling effects of urban tree canopy

红线政策的遗留影响导致城市树冠的不平等降温效应

【摘要】

Redlining—a racially discriminatory policy of systematic disinvestment established by the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation (HOLC) in the 1930s and continued until the late 1960s—still influences the contemporary landscape of cities in the US. While the heterogeneous distribution of land surface temperature and tree canopy cover between neighborhoods with different HOLC grades have been recently examined, the development of long-term and city-specific heat management strategies is still limited. Here, we explored the effect of redlining in Portland, Oregon, and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to assess its contemporary impact on climate equity. We performed a change analysis of land surface temperature and tree canopy area over the past and introduced mixed-effects models to test the intra- and inter-city differences in canopy cooling effects between the different HOLC grades. We found that (1) persistent temporal patterns of lower land surface temperatures and larger tree canopy areas are observed in higher HOLC grades, (2) greater green equity was achieved through contrasting temporal changes in tree canopy areas across HOLC grades in Portland and Philadelphia, and (3) opposite patterns exist between these cities, with stronger canopy cooling effects in neighborhoods with a Low HOLC grade in Portland and those with a High HOLC grade in Philadelphia. Differences in tree canopy change between the two cities over the past decade highlight potential influences of city-specific tree planting practices. Local planners should back tree planting initiatives to equitably mitigate urban heat exposure, considering historical redlining contexts and contemporary landscape features.

【摘要翻译】

红线政策——一种种族歧视性的系统性剥夺投资政策，由房主贷款公司（HOLC）在1930年代建立，持续到1960年代末——至今仍影响着美国城市的当代景观。尽管最近已经研究了不同HOLC等级社区之间的土地表面温度和树冠覆盖的异质分布，但长期的、针对特定城市的热管理策略的发展仍然有限。在这里，我们探讨了俄勒冈州波特兰和宾夕法尼亚州费城的红线政策，以评估其对气候公平的当代影响。我们对过去的土地表面温度和树冠面积进行了变化分析，并引入混合效应模型来测试不同HOLC等级之间树冠降温效应的城市内和城市间差异。我们发现：（1）在较高HOLC等级的社区观察到较低的土地表面温度和较大的树冠面积的持久时间模式；（2）通过波特兰和费城不同HOLC等级之间树冠面积的对比时间变化，实现了更大的绿色公平；（3）这两个城市之间存在相反的模式，波特兰的低HOLC等级社区和费城的高HOLC等级社区展现出更强的树冠降温效应。这两个城市在过去十年间树冠变化之间的差异突出了城市特定植树实践的潜在影响。地方规划者应支持树木种植倡议，公平地减轻城市热暴露，同时考虑历史上的红线政策背景和当代景观特征。

【作者以及邮箱】

Meen Chel Jung 韩国首尔延世大学城市规划与工程系 jungmc@yonsei.ac.kr

Michael G. Yost 美国华盛顿大学环境与职业健康科学系 airion@uw.edu

Andrew L. Dannenberg 美国华盛顿大学环境与职业健康科学系 adannen@uw.edu

Karen Dyson 美国树木分析公司 karenldyson@gmail.com

Marina Alberti 美国华盛顿大学城市设计与规划系 malberti@uw.edu

【论文3】

Mapping potential conflicts between wilderness travel and ecological values on a national scale

在国家层面上绘制野外旅行与生态价值之间的潜在冲突

【摘要】

Human activity has been a significant driving force behind global declines in remaining wilderness areas. Previous assessments of human activity have focused on long-term cumulative human pressure. However, the growing popularity of nature-based tourism has led to increased tourists' footfall in remote wilderness areas. These short-term tourists' activities, if not assessed and properly restricted, may aggregate to form new potential impact zones. This study maps the potential conflicts between tourism pressure and wilderness' ecological value on a national scale across China. By comparing distribution of conflict zones created through persistent human and tourism pressure, we identify wilderness areas threatened by pressures from tourism. Employing a Self Organizing Maps algorithm, we extract distinctive landscape features of wilderness areas, thereby shedding light on their attraction to visitors and subsequent ecological vulnerability. Our results show that, about two-thirds of China's land is identified as wilderness with 12 types of landscape character, among which 8.9% of wilderness areas suffer from some level of tourism pressure. Moreover, 80.3% of HH (high tourism pressure and high ecological values) conflict zones are concentrated in the southeast of China. Finally, 46.1% of HH conflict zones are unaffected by persistent human activities but are threatened by tourist activities. Our findings contribute to future placement and functional zoning of wilderness reserves in China, with potential applicability to conflict governance and wilderness conservation strategies in other developing countries.

【摘要翻译】

人类活动是全球剩余荒野区域减少的重要驱动力。以往对人类活动的评估主要集中于长期累积的人类压力。然而，基于自然的旅游活动的日益普及导致偏远荒野地区游客数量增加。如果这些短期游客活动未经评估和适当限制，可能会聚合形成新的潜在影响区。本研究在中国全国范围内绘制了旅游压力与荒野生态价值之间的潜在冲突图。通过比较由持续的人类和旅游压力产生的冲突区域分布，我们识别了受旅游压力威胁的荒野区域。采用自组织图算法，我们提取了荒野区域的独特景观特征，从而揭示了它们对游客的吸引力和随之而来的生态脆弱性。我们的结果显示，大约三分之二的中国土地被认定为荒野，具有12种景观特征，其中8.9%的荒野地区受到某种程度的旅游压力。此外，80.3%的高旅游压力和高生态价值（HH）冲突区集中在中国东南部。最后，46.1%的HH冲突区未受持续人类活动影响，但受到旅游活动的威胁。我们的发现有助于未来中国荒野保护区的布局和功能分区，同时可能适用于其他发展中国家的冲突治理和荒野保护策略。

【作者以及邮箱】

Tiantian Xu 3170100590@zju.edu.cn 浙江大学农业与生物技术学院

Running Chen 3190101443@zju.edu.cn 浙江大学农业与生物技术学院

Steve Carver S.J.Carver@leeds.ac.uk 利兹大学地理学院野地研究所

Jiayu Wu wujiayula@gmail.com 浙江大学风景园林学院

【论文4】

Everyday places to get away – Lessons learned from Covid-19 lockdowns

日常逃避之地——从COVID-19封锁中学到的教训

【摘要】

Being able to get away from everyday stressors and demands, even if close to home and just for a few minutes, is important for wellbeing. During the Covid-19 lockdown periods, people’s ability to get away changed significantly. An increase in visits to nearby natural places is well documented. Little is known about other types of places people visited to get away. An online UK survey was conducted in 2020 (N = 850) investigating what places people visited to get away during the pandemic, what they did in those places, how place and activity choices were related to each other and to demographic variables, and to recalled hedonic and eudaimonic wellbeing during those visits. Participants visited a rich array of places and engaged in a variety of activities that supported their hedonic and eudaimonic wellbeing needs. Responses were grouped into four types of places (at home outdoors, at home indoors, away from home outdoors, and away from home indoors) and seven activity types (cognitive, walks, nature engagement, social activities, technology use, relaxing, and exercise). Place and activity choices were strongly linked. Visiting outdoor places was most beneficial for wellbeing (and most common), especially when it involved mindful engagement with nature (bird watching, gardening) or exercise. Staying indoors, engaging with technologies (computers, television) was least beneficial and more common among those with no degree or job, living in urban areas, and identifying as male. The findings demonstrate the importance of understanding place-activity interactions to support the wellbeing benefits derived from visits to places to get away.

【摘要翻译】

即使是在家附近，哪怕只有几分钟，能够远离日常的压力和需求对于幸福感是非常重要的。在Covid-19封锁期间，人们逃避现实的能力发生了显著变化。增加了对附近自然场所的访问，这一点有充分的记录。关于人们访问其他类型的逃避地点的信息却知之甚少。2020年在英国进行了一项在线调查（N = 850），调查了疫情期间人们访问了哪些地方，他们在这些地方做了什么，地点和活动选择如何相互关联以及与人口统计变量的关系，以及回忆中的享乐性和自我实现性福祉。参与者访问了多种多样的地方，并从事了多种活动，以满足他们的享乐性和自我实现性福祉需求。反应被归纳为四种类型的地点（在家户外、在家室内、在家外户外和在家外室内）和七种活动类型（认知、散步、自然互动、社交活动、使用技术、放松和锻炼）。地点和活动选择之间有很强的联系。访问户外地点对福祉最有益（也是最常见的），尤其是当涉及到与自然的有意识互动（观鸟、园艺）或锻炼时。呆在室内，使用技术（电脑、电视）的益处最少，而且这种情况在无学位或工作、居住在城市地区、以及男性中更为常见。研究结果显示，了解地点与活动之间的互动对于支持从逃避地访问中获得的福祉益处至关重要。

【作者以及邮箱】

B.Gatersleben 英国萨里大学心理学院

E. White英国萨里大学心理学院

K.J. Wyles 英国普利茅斯大学心理学院

S.E. Golding英国萨里大学心理学院

G. Murrell英国萨里大学心理学院

C. Scarles 英国萨里大学旅游与酒店管理学院

T. Xu 英国萨里大学旅游与酒店管理学院

B.F.T. Brockett 英国自然英格兰组织

C. Willis英国自然英格兰组织

【论文5】

The quality of Swedish adolescents’ outdoor life and its relationship with self-esteem and well-being

瑞典青少年户外生活质量及其与自尊和幸福感的关系

【摘要】

This study investigates the relationship between outdoor life and the well-being and self-esteem of Swedish adolescents aged 12–15 years old (n = 320), residing in three different living environments in the south of Sweden. The study employed a questionnaire that was administered twice during a school year that included questions on time spent outdoors, environmental quality and the perceived benefit of the outdoor environment. Additionally, the study used standardized scales to measure life satisfaction, self-esteem and mental microorganism. The results of the study revealed that adolescents who had more positive perceptions of their outdoor environment and being outdoors reported higher life satisfaction and self-esteem, as well as better mental health. Notably, girls’ generally perceived their outdoor environments as lower quality compared to boys across different seasons. Furthermore, variations between living environments and seasons were also observed. Overall, the study underscores the importance of promoting outdoor life and highlights specific areas planners should address to create outdoor environments with possible benefits for the well-being of adolescents of different ages, sexes and living in different communities.

【摘要翻译】

本研究探讨了户外生活与居住在瑞典南部三种不同生活环境中的12至15岁瑞典青少年（n=320）的幸福感和自尊之间的关系。研究使用了一份问卷，该问卷在一个学年中进行了两次调查，包括关于户外活动时间、环境质量和户外环境感知益处的问题。此外，研究还使用了标准化量表来测量生活满意度、自尊和心理健康。研究结果显示，对户外环境和户外活动有更积极看法的青少年报告了更高的生活满意度和自尊，以及更好的心理健康。值得注意的是，与男孩相比，女孩普遍认为他们的户外环境质量较低，这一现象在不同季节都有观察到。此外，还观察到不同居住环境和季节之间的变化。总体而言，该研究强调了推广户外生活的重要性，并突出了规划者应当解决的特定领域，以创造可能对不同年龄、性别和居住在不同社区的青少年的幸福感带来益处的户外环境。

【作者以及邮箱】

Mark Wales 瑞典农业科学大学人与社会系

Eva Hoff 瑞典隆德大学心理学系

Fredrika Mårtensson 瑞典农业科学大学人与社会系

Jan-Eric Englund 瑞典农业科学大学生物系统与技术系

【论文6】

Exploring nutrient-sensitive landscape configurations for rural communities in southern Mexico

探索适合墨西哥南部农村社区的营养敏感景观配置

【摘要】

In Mexico, the traditional MILPA polycropping system is giving way to maize monocultures, impacting the nutritional diversity of smallholder farmers and diminishing ecosystem services. This study explores landscape alternatives to enhance nutritional self-sufficiency and environmental performance in rural communities, comparing scenarios without (S1) and with (S2) innovative cropping systems. The innovations, maize-squash and MIAF (a variation of MILPA with fruit trees), were evaluated using the LandscapeIMAGES modeling framework in two Oaxacan municipalities: Santa Catarina Tayata (SCT) and San Cristóbal Amoltepec (SCA). The assessment considered nutritional elements, ecosystem services proxies, labor requirements, and income associated with various land-use options. In scenario S1, nutritional self-sufficiency was achievable in SCT but not in SCA, even with a 17% expansion of agriculture into forest and grassland areas. Scenario S2, incorporating maize-squash and MIAF, facilitated nutritional self-sufficiency in both municipalities, while concurrently boosting incomes, carbon stocks, and reducing soil erosion. This research underscores the potential of reshaping landscapes in small communities to address widespread issues like nutritional gaps and inadequate natural resource conservation. By emphasizing innovative cropping systems, the study provides positive solutions to enhance the wellbeing of smallholder farmers and promote sustainable land use practices in the face of evolving agricultural trends.

【摘要翻译】

在墨西哥，传统的MILPA混作系统正逐渐被玉米单作取代，这影响了小农户的营养多样性并减少了生态系统服务。本研究探索了农村社区增强营养自给和环境表现的景观替代方案，比较了无创新种植系统（S1）和有创新种植系统（S2）的情景。创新种植系统包括玉米-南瓜和MIAF（MILPA的一种变体，加入了果树），使用LandscapeIMAGES建模框架在两个瓦哈卡州的市镇：Santa Catarina Tayata（SCT）和San Cristóbal Amoltepec（SCA）进行评估。评估考虑了营养元素、生态服务代理、劳动需求和与各种土地使用选项相关的收入。在S1情景中，SCT实现了营养自给，但SCA未能实现，即使农业向森林和草原地区扩展了17%。S2情景中，引入玉米-南瓜和MIAF，两个市镇均实现了营养自给，同时增加了收入，提高了碳储量，并减少了土壤侵蚀。这项研究强调了在小社区重塑景观的潜力，以解决营养缺口和自然资源保护不足等广泛问题。通过强调创新种植系统，该研究为增强小农户的福祉和促进可持续土地使用实践提供了积极的解决方案，以应对农业趋势的变化。

【作者以及邮箱】

Ivan P. Novotny生态系统管理，环境系统科学系，陆地生态系统研究所，苏黎世联邦理工学院

Walter A.H. Rossing 农业系统生态学小组，瓦赫宁根大学与研究中心

Pablo Tittonell 农业生态学、环境与系统小组，巴里洛切林业和农业研究所（IFAB）

Mariela Fuentes-Ponce 动植物生产系，墨西哥城自治大学-索奇米尔科

Jeroen C.J. Groot 农业系统生态学小组，瓦赫宁根大学与研究中心

【论文7】

A typological study of the provision and use of communal outdoor space in Australian apartment developments

澳大利亚公寓开发中公共户外空间供应与使用的类型学研究

【摘要】

There is a consensus that higher-density urban settings need to be accompanied by communal outdoor space (COS) to bolster the well-being of apartment residents. Nonetheless, there is a lack of studies identifying COS types in apartment buildings and systematically assessing the degree to which they provide greenery and are used by residents. In response, this study developed a COS typology for apartment buildings in Australian cities, measured the degree to which each COS type provides access to greenery, and examined which COS types received the most frequent visitation via a resident survey (n = 975). Results show that some dominant COS typologies provide scant access to greenery and are underutilised. For instance, the Podium Terrace and Roof Terrace types only contained 24 and 8 % vegetated area, with the remainder hard surfaces. Moreover, the Podium Terrace and Roof Terrace types averaged no substantial trees. Conversely, ground floor types such as Parks and Setback Gardens contained 51 and 53 % planted area, respectively and significant numbers of trees. Policy requirements that target specific COS types could elevate their naturalness and increase use.

【摘要翻译】

普遍认为，高密度城市环境需要配备公共户外空间（COS），以增强公寓居民的福祉。然而，目前缺乏对公寓建筑中COS类型进行识别以及系统评估其提供绿化程度和居民使用情况的研究。为此，本研究为澳大利亚城市的公寓建筑开发了一套COS类型学，测量了每种COS类型提供绿化的程度，并通过居民调查（n = 975）检查了哪些COS类型的访问频率最高。结果显示，一些主导的COS类型学提供的绿化机会少，且使用不足。例如，平台露台和屋顶露台类型的植被面积仅占24%和8%，其余为硬质表面。此外，平台露台和屋顶露台类型几乎没有大树。相反，底层类型如公园和后退花园的种植面积分别为51%和53%，且有大量树木。针对特定COS类型的政策要求可以提高其自然度并增加使用率。

【作者以及邮箱】

Julian Bolleter 澳大利亚西部大学澳大利亚城市设计研究中心

Paula Hooper 澳大利亚西部大学澳大利亚城市设计研究中心

Alex Kleeman 城市研究中心，全球城市与社会研究学院，皇家墨尔本理工大学

Nicole Edwards 澳大利亚西部大学澳大利亚城市设计研究中心

Sarah Foster 城市研究中心，全球城市与社会研究学院，皇家墨尔本理工大学

【论文8】

Key connectivity areas in the Llanganates-Sangay Ecological Corridor in Ecuador: A participative multicriteria analysis based on a landscape species

厄瓜多尔Llanganates-Sangay生态走廊的关键连通区域：基于景观物种的参与式多标准分析

【摘要】

Habitat loss and fragmentation are critical threats to biodiversity decline as they decrease the species occurrence and dispersal probability between natural habitats. Thus, promoting habitat connectivity supports species dispersal and accessibility to vital resources within the landscape, and contributes to long term population persistence. However, decision-making in human dominated landscapes challenges the sustainability of conservation-based land management initiatives. The Llanganates – Sangay Ecological Corridor is located on the eastern slopes of the Ecuadorian Andes, harbouring high levels of endemism and biodiversity in a human-dominated landscape between two National Parks. We applied circuit analysis to model the habitat connectivity for the Mountain Tapir. We defined the limits of the corridor based on a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and a spatial suitability approach combined with a sub-basin prioritization method. We found that forest and native grasslands contribute the most to the Mountain Tapir’s dispersal movements, while roads constrain them the most. Furthermore, natural vegetation remnants between pastures and crops support habitat connectivity as stepping-stones. We identified threats to biodiversity and distance to conservation areas as the most crucial features of spatial suitability. Our study combined scientific information to identify key areas for providing habitat connectivity of a landscape species and the spatial suitability necessary for sustaining wildlife conservation, while supporting the participation of local stakeholders, conservationists, academia, and NGOs.

【摘要翻译】

生境丧失和破碎化是生物多样性下降的关键威胁，因为它们降低了物种在自然栖息地之间的出现和扩散概率。因此，促进栖息地连通性支持物种扩散和在景观中获取关键资源的能力，并有助于长期种群持续。然而，在人类主导的景观中进行决策挑战了基于保护的土地管理计划的可持续性。Llanganates – Sangay生态走廊位于厄瓜多尔安第斯东坡，介于两个国家公园之间的人类主导景观中，拥有高度特有性和生物多样性。我们应用电路分析模型来模拟山塔皮尔的栖息地连通性。我们根据多标准决策分析和结合子流域优先级方法的空间适宜性方法定义了走廊的界限。我们发现森林和本地草原最大限度地促进了山塔皮尔的扩散移动，而道路对其限制最大。此外，草地和农作物之间的天然植被残留物作为生态步石支持栖息地连通性。我们确定了生物多样性威胁和到保护区的距离是空间适宜性的最关键特征。我们的研究结合了科学信息，以识别为景观物种提供栖息地连通性的关键区域和维持野生动物保护必需的空间适宜性，同时支持地方利益相关者、保护人士、学术界和非政府组织的参与。