Default
{ f n } → f . \{f_n\}\to f. {fn}→f.
Examples
1,
f
n
,
f
∈
R
[
a
,
b
]
,
∫
f
≠
lim
n
→
+
∞
∫
f
n
.
f
n
:
=
x
1
+
n
(
1
−
x
2
)
n
,
x
∈
[
0
,
1
]
.
f_n,f\in R[a,b],\int f\neq\lim_{n\to+\infty}\int f_n.\\ \ \\ f_n:=\frac{x}{1+n}(1-x^2)^n,x\in[0,1].
fn,f∈R[a,b],∫f=n→+∞lim∫fn. fn:=1+nx(1−x2)n,x∈[0,1].
No no no, it’s wrong.
2,
f
n
,
f
∈
R
[
a
,
b
]
,
∫
f
=
lim
n
→
+
∞
∫
f
n
,
{
f
n
}
⇉̸
f
.
f_n,f\in R[a,b],\int f=\lim_{n\to+\infty}\int f_n,\{f_n\}\not\rightrightarrows f.
fn,f∈R[a,b],∫f=n→+∞lim∫fn,{fn}⇉f.
This says uniform convergence is not necessary.
Monotonic Convergence Theorem of Integral
By Levi.
Content:
{
f
n
}
⩽
M
,
f
n
⩾
f
n
+
1
,
f
n
→
0.
⟹
lim inf
n
→
+
∞
∫
a
b
f
n
=
0.
\{f_n\}\leqslant M,f_n\geqslant f_{n+1},f_n\to 0.\\ \ \\ \implies\liminf\limits_{n\to+\infty}\int_a^bf_n=0.
{fn}⩽M,fn⩾fn+1,fn→0. ⟹n→+∞liminf∫abfn=0.
As for { f n } \{f_n\} {fn} n n n-increasing, it has similar conclusions.
And for integrable, you can figure out its integral is exactly 0 0 0.
Proof:
Idea: Make a monotonic and continuous function sequence fitting to Dini theorem, to control the lower integral of f n f_n fn.
Control Convergence Theorem of Integral
By Lebesgue.
Content:
{
f
n
}
⊆
R
[
a
,
b
]
,
f
n
→
f
∈
R
[
a
,
b
]
,
∣
f
n
∣
⩽
M
.
⟹
lim
∫
a
b
∣
f
n
−
f
∣
=
0.
\{f_n\}\subseteq R[a,b],f_n\to f\in R[a,b],|f_n|\leqslant M.\implies\lim\int_a^b|f_n-f|=0.
{fn}⊆R[a,b],fn→f∈R[a,b],∣fn∣⩽M.⟹lim∫ab∣fn−f∣=0.
Proof:
Idea: g n : = ∣ f n − f ∣ g_n:=|f_n-f| gn:=∣fn−f∣, use monotonic sequence g n ~ : = sup k ⩾ n g k \widetilde{g_n}:=\sup_{k\geqslant n}g_k gn :=supk⩾ngk, fitting to Monotonic Convergence Theorem’s extrapolation, to control g n g_n gn.
Fatou Theorem
I haven’t figured out a proper name of pure math excluding name.
Content:
{
f
n
}
⊆
R
[
a
,
b
]
,
0
⩽
f
n
,
f
n
→
f
∈
R
[
a
,
b
]
.
⟹
lim inf
n
→
+
∞
∫
a
b
f
n
⩾
∫
a
b
f
.
\{f_n\}\subseteq R[a,b],0\leqslant f_{n},f_n\to f\in R[a,b].\\ \ \\ \implies\liminf\limits_{n\to+\infty}\int_a^bf_n\geqslant\int_a^bf.
{fn}⊆R[a,b],0⩽fn,fn→f∈R[a,b]. ⟹n→+∞liminf∫abfn⩾∫abf.
Proof:
Essence: Finally you can only have an infinitesimal interval of f n f_n fn out of ε \varepsilon ε-vicinity of f f f, because it’s a point-wisely convergent.
Idea: similar to above two?
Its real form:
lim inf
n
→
+
∞
∫
a
b
f
n
⩾
∫
a
b
lim inf
n
→
+
∞
f
.
\liminf\limits_{n\to+\infty}\int_a^bf_n\geqslant\int_a^b\liminf\limits_{n\to+\infty}f.
n→+∞liminf∫abfn⩾∫abn→+∞liminff.